| Peer-Reviewed

Non-medicine Methods of Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Received: 20 December 2020    Accepted: 30 April 2021    Published: 21 May 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Few decades away a problem of throwing of acidic gastric content into an esophagus was reduced to the concept of reflux-esophagitis. In-depth study of pathogenesis of a disease resulted in “gastroesophageal reflux disease” (GERD) term which is acknowledged as leading disease of digestive system in terms of frequency and dangerous complications. GERD formation is determined by influence of numerous factors, however, it is generally accepted, that it is mainly related to insufficiency of lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Also, role of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in regulation of functional state of LES is determined. In spite of success in field of pharmacology, number of GERD patients has no downward trend which mainstreams search for non-medicine treatment methods. Physical factors affecting pathological processes by influencing regulatory processes are among these methods. Goal of this study is elaboration, scientific justification and clinical implementation of natural and preformed physical factors and acupuncture in treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Materials and Investigation methods: Randomized placebo-controlled study included 137 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 63 (46%) men and 74 (54%) women, at the age of 18 to 65. Investigation included patients with no contraindications for physiotherapy. Patients with Barrett’s esophagus, stricture of esophagus, esophagus ulcer have also been excluded from investigation. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Ist group – 40 GERD patients, including high-frequency electromagnetic field effect and general iodine bromine bathes. II nd group - 67 GERD patients passing acupuncture treatment course. Control group was comprised of 30 GERD patients, receiving placebo MEF therapy. Treatment was carried out without medicines. Therapeutic effectiveness of complex influence of microwave electromagnetic field therapy (MEF-therapy) applied to collar area alternated with general iodine-bromine bathes on clinical manifestations of GERD is determined. Treatment course contributed to reliable decrease of increased count of VIP – a neurotransmitter, regulating LES tonus. In term, it contributed to improve of functional state of LES, reliable decrease of reflux index, and, as a result, improvement of clinical and functional indicators. Estimation of clinical manifestations of a disease among patients of 2nd group displayed positive dynamics of clinical and functional indicators. Round-clock pH-monitoring of stomach and esophageal content shows reliable decreaseof transitory relaxations of LES during single acupuncture procedure and increase of pH of gastric content. Acupuncture course also resulted in decrease of elevated VIP numbers.

Published in International Journal of Gastroenterology (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15
Page(s) 33-39
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, pH-Metry, Microwave Electromagnetic Field Therapy (MEF-Therapy), General Iodine Bromine Bathes, Acupuncture, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide

References
[1] Tsimmerman YaS, Vologzhanina LG. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Klinicheskaya meditsina. 2005; 83 (9): 16-24. (In Russ.).
[2] Vaezi MF, ed. Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2016. 165p.
[3] Yadlapati R, Tye M, Keefer L, et al. Psychosocial distress and quality of life impairment are associated with symptom severity in PPI non-responders with normal impedance-pH profiles. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113 (1): 31-38. [PubMed: 28895583]
[4] Ravindran A, Iyer PG. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Complications. In: Pitchumoni CS, Dharmarajan TS, eds. Geriatric Gastroenterology. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2020: 1-17.
[5] Maev IV, Kazyulin A. N., Yurenev G. L. Cardiac syndrome under gastroesophageal reflux disease: manifestations, incidence rate, causes and remedies. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2014; (25): 8-17. (In Russ.).
[6] Badalov NG, Efendieva MT, Golubeva VV. The influence of magnetic therapy and naftalan treatment on the clinical course of gastroesophageal reflux disease with concomitant bronchial asthma. Fizioterapiya, bal'neologiya i reabilitatsiya. 2017; (1): 25-31. (In Russ.).
[7] Zalvan CN, ed. Laryngopharyngeal and Gastroesophageal Reflux. A Comprehensive Guide to Diagnosis, Treatment, and Diet-Based Approaches. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2020. 487p.
[8] Yadlapati R, Pandolfino JE, Lidder AK, et al. Oropharyngeal pH testing does not predict response to poton-pump inhibitor therapy in patients with laryngeal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111 (11): 1517-1524. [PubMed: 27091320]
[9] Marsicano JA, de Moura-Grec PG, Bonato RC, Sales-Peres Mde C, Sales-Peres A, Sales-Peres SH. Gastroesophageal reflux, dental erosion, and halitosis in epidemiological surveys: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 25 (2): 135-41.
[10] Poroikova MV, Efendieva MT, Vinnitskii LI. Regulation of the functional status of the lower esophageal sphincter with gastrointestinal hormones in cardiospasm and reflux esophagitis. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2002; (7): 23-8 (In Russ.).
[11] Hungin APS, Molloy-Bland M, Scarpignato C. Revisiting Montreal: new insights into symptoms and their causes, and implications for the future of GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114: 414-421. [PubMed: 30323266]
[12] Horgan S, Fuchs K-H, eds. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Surgical and Therapeutic Innovations. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2020. 212p.
[13] Yadlapati R, Vaezi MF, Vela MF, et al. Management options for patients with GERD and persistent symptoms on proton pump inhibitors: recommendations from an Expert Panel. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113 (7): 980-986. [Pubmed: 29686276]
[14] Miwa H, Igarashi A, Teng L, et al. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: indirect comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan and proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastroenterol. 2019; 54: 718-729. [PubMed: 30919071]
[15] Miraglia C, Russo M, Barchi A. T01.02.19. Is it possible to withdraw PPIS therapy in GERD patients? A prospective study on 216 patients using a second generation barrier drug. Abstracts of the 26th National Congress of Digestive Diseases. Dig Liver Dis. 2020; 52S2: S1-S203.
[16] Yadlapati R, Hungness ES, Pandolfino JE. Complications of antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113 (8): 1137-1147. [PubMed: 29899438]
[17] Testoni PA, Testoni SGG, Mazzoleni G, Fanti L. Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. In: Wagh MS, Wani SB, eds. Gastrointestinal Interventional Endoscopy. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2020: 325-338.
[18] Сhang KJ, Beel R. Transoral incisionless fundoplication. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020; 30 (2): 267-289. [PubMed: 32146946]
[19] Brimhall B, Maydeo A, Wagh MS, Hammad H. Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and Anti-Reflux MucoSectomy (ARMS) for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. In: Wagh MS, Wani SB, eds. Gastrointestinal Interventional Endoscopy. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2020: 339-344.
[20] Bell R, Lipham J, Louie B, et al. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors for management of moderate-to-severe regurgitation in GERD: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89 (1): 14-22. e1. [PubMed: 30031018]
[21] Ponomarenko G. N., Zolotareva Т. А. Fizicheskie metodi v gastroenterologii. Saint-Petersburg; 2004. (In Russ.).
[22] Korepanov AM, Mikhailova MD. The application of spa and resort factors for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kul'tury. 2011; (2): 27-30. (In Russ.).
[23] Efimenko NV, Ebzeev AKh, Chalaya EN. SMT-forez dalalgina pri gastroezofagealnoi reflyuksnoi bolezni. Gastroenterologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2012; (2-3): 31. (In Russ.).
[24] Usmanov FF, Gil'mutdinov AR, Kunafin AF, Gil'mutdinova LT, Yamaletdinov KS. Potable mineral water in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2013; 8 (6): 135-7. (In Russ.).
[25] Dickman R, Schiff E, Holland A, Wright C, Sarela SR, Han B, Fass R. Clinical trial: acupuncture vs. doubling the proton pump inhibitor dose in refractory heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 26 (10): 1333-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03520.x.
[26] Xu S, Hou X, Zha H, Gao Z, Zhang Y, Chen JD. Electroacupuncture accelerates solid gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126 (12): T1163.
[27] Chang X, Yan J, Yi S, Lin Y, Yang R. The affects of acupuncture at sibai and neiting acupoints on gastric peristalsis. J Tradit Chin Med. 2001; 21 (4): 286-8.
[28] Qian L. W., Lin Y. P. Effect of EAP at zusanli (ST 36) point in regulating the pylorus peristaltic function//Chung Kuo Chung Hsi J Chieh Ho Tsa Chin Jun.- 1993.-13 (6): 336-339.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Matanat Efendiyeva. (2021). Non-medicine Methods of Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. International Journal of Gastroenterology, 5(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Matanat Efendiyeva. Non-medicine Methods of Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Int. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 5(1), 33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Matanat Efendiyeva. Non-medicine Methods of Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Int J Gastroenterol. 2021;5(1):33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15,
      author = {Matanat Efendiyeva},
      title = {Non-medicine Methods of Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease},
      journal = {International Journal of Gastroenterology},
      volume = {5},
      number = {1},
      pages = {33-39},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijg.20210501.15},
      abstract = {Few decades away a problem of throwing of acidic gastric content into an esophagus was reduced to the concept of reflux-esophagitis. In-depth study of pathogenesis of a disease resulted in “gastroesophageal reflux disease” (GERD) term which is acknowledged as leading disease of digestive system in terms of frequency and dangerous complications. GERD formation is determined by influence of numerous factors, however, it is generally accepted, that it is mainly related to insufficiency of lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Also, role of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in regulation of functional state of LES is determined. In spite of success in field of pharmacology, number of GERD patients has no downward trend which mainstreams search for non-medicine treatment methods. Physical factors affecting pathological processes by influencing regulatory processes are among these methods. Goal of this study is elaboration, scientific justification and clinical implementation of natural and preformed physical factors and acupuncture in treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Materials and Investigation methods: Randomized placebo-controlled study included 137 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 63 (46%) men and 74 (54%) women, at the age of 18 to 65. Investigation included patients with no contraindications for physiotherapy. Patients with Barrett’s esophagus, stricture of esophagus, esophagus ulcer have also been excluded from investigation. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Ist group – 40 GERD patients, including high-frequency electromagnetic field effect and general iodine bromine bathes. II nd group - 67 GERD patients passing acupuncture treatment course. Control group was comprised of 30 GERD patients, receiving placebo MEF therapy. Treatment was carried out without medicines. Therapeutic effectiveness of complex influence of microwave electromagnetic field therapy (MEF-therapy) applied to collar area alternated with general iodine-bromine bathes on clinical manifestations of GERD is determined. Treatment course contributed to reliable decrease of increased count of VIP – a neurotransmitter, regulating LES tonus. In term, it contributed to improve of functional state of LES, reliable decrease of reflux index, and, as a result, improvement of clinical and functional indicators. Estimation of clinical manifestations of a disease among patients of 2nd group displayed positive dynamics of clinical and functional indicators. Round-clock pH-monitoring of stomach and esophageal content shows reliable decreaseof transitory relaxations of LES during single acupuncture procedure and increase of pH of gastric content. Acupuncture course also resulted in decrease of elevated VIP numbers.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Non-medicine Methods of Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    AU  - Matanat Efendiyeva
    Y1  - 2021/05/21
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15
    T2  - International Journal of Gastroenterology
    JF  - International Journal of Gastroenterology
    JO  - International Journal of Gastroenterology
    SP  - 33
    EP  - 39
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-169X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20210501.15
    AB  - Few decades away a problem of throwing of acidic gastric content into an esophagus was reduced to the concept of reflux-esophagitis. In-depth study of pathogenesis of a disease resulted in “gastroesophageal reflux disease” (GERD) term which is acknowledged as leading disease of digestive system in terms of frequency and dangerous complications. GERD formation is determined by influence of numerous factors, however, it is generally accepted, that it is mainly related to insufficiency of lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Also, role of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in regulation of functional state of LES is determined. In spite of success in field of pharmacology, number of GERD patients has no downward trend which mainstreams search for non-medicine treatment methods. Physical factors affecting pathological processes by influencing regulatory processes are among these methods. Goal of this study is elaboration, scientific justification and clinical implementation of natural and preformed physical factors and acupuncture in treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Materials and Investigation methods: Randomized placebo-controlled study included 137 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 63 (46%) men and 74 (54%) women, at the age of 18 to 65. Investigation included patients with no contraindications for physiotherapy. Patients with Barrett’s esophagus, stricture of esophagus, esophagus ulcer have also been excluded from investigation. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Ist group – 40 GERD patients, including high-frequency electromagnetic field effect and general iodine bromine bathes. II nd group - 67 GERD patients passing acupuncture treatment course. Control group was comprised of 30 GERD patients, receiving placebo MEF therapy. Treatment was carried out without medicines. Therapeutic effectiveness of complex influence of microwave electromagnetic field therapy (MEF-therapy) applied to collar area alternated with general iodine-bromine bathes on clinical manifestations of GERD is determined. Treatment course contributed to reliable decrease of increased count of VIP – a neurotransmitter, regulating LES tonus. In term, it contributed to improve of functional state of LES, reliable decrease of reflux index, and, as a result, improvement of clinical and functional indicators. Estimation of clinical manifestations of a disease among patients of 2nd group displayed positive dynamics of clinical and functional indicators. Round-clock pH-monitoring of stomach and esophageal content shows reliable decreaseof transitory relaxations of LES during single acupuncture procedure and increase of pH of gastric content. Acupuncture course also resulted in decrease of elevated VIP numbers.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • National Institute of Sport Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baku, Azerbaijan

  • Sections