The experiment was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center (on station) for two consecutive years (2021-2022) with the objective to evaluate the effect of harvesting stage and cutting intervals on herbage dry matter yield, other agronomic performances, nutritive value and economic advantages of Desho grass variety (KK1-DZF # 591) produced under irrigation. The treatment contained three levels of harvesting stages (60, 75, and 90) and three cutting times (30, 45 and 60 days). The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design in factorial arrangement with three replications. The data collected from the current study were herbage dry matter yield, yield related agronomic parameters, and chemical composition of the grass. The analysis of variance indicated that plant height, leave length, leaf to stem ratio and herbage dry matter yield were showed significance (P<0.001) variations among the treatments. The highest plant height was recorded from advanced age at cutting interval 60 days and the lowest was from the early harvesting at 30 days. The highest herbage dry matter yield was recorded from treatment harvested every 45 days of cutting interval, after a maximum age of 75, this was due to high number of tillers recorded. The lowest values were recorded long stages of harvesting (90 and 75 days) with long cutting interval (60 days). The highest cutting frequencies were recorded from early harvesting stage (60 days) of cutting interval after every month (30 days) and the lowest was from late harvesting stage (90 days) of cutting interval after two months (60 days). CP, ash NDF and, ADF contents of Desho grass was affected by harvesting stage and cutting interval. The highest mean values of CP and ash contents were recorded from early harvested forage at 30 and 45 days than 60 days of cutting intervals and the lowest was recorded from late of cutting interval. The highest returns were obtained from forage harvested at every 45 days after reach maximum age of 75 days at both seasons. 75x45 treatment combination was good in total dry biomass yield, chemical compositions and high return. Therefore, Desho grass established under irrigation condition harvested after the harvesting stage of 75 days with cutting interval 45 days was recommended for the end user of the study area and similar agro ecology.
Published in | Science Development (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13 |
Page(s) | 60-67 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cutting Interval, Desho, Harvesting Stage, Herbage, Quality
Source of variation | DF | PH | NTPP | LL | LSR | DMY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rep | 2 | 1.40ns | 0.25ns | 0.77ns | 0.28ns | 0.37ns |
Age | 2 | 0.25* | 3.39* | 1.73** | 1.10ns | 1.91ns |
Intervals | 2 | 45.09** | 5.64* | 20.00** | 2.57* | 5.43*** |
Age * intervals | 4 | 2.48*** | 0.61* | 2.12*** | 0.71*** | 0.117** |
Error | 37 |
Treatments (age*interval) | Parameters | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | NTPP | LL | LSR | TDMY (t/ha) | |
60x30 | 52.56c | 90.49ab | 31.98c | 4.39a | 19.40ab |
60x45 | 63.78bc | 80.33ab | 39.65 ab | 4.09a | 18.67ab |
60x60 | 85.27a | 81.36ab | 42.78 a | 2.11c | 17.89ab |
75x30 | 74.15ab | 91.81ab | 41.30a | 3.94a | 17.61ab |
75x45 | 76.15ab | 109.66a | 37.98abc | 3.79ab | 23.61a |
75x60 | 86.51a | 72.13b | 40.64ab | 2.71bc | 17.13b |
90x30 | 53.73c | 93.96ab | 33.31bc | 3.54ab | 19.04ab |
90x45 | 62.12bc | 82.70ab | 37.60abc | 3.76ab | 18.02ab |
90x60 | 90.80a | 68.93b | 44.16a | 0.64d | 17.13b |
Overall Mean | 68.07 | 88.17 | 37.83 | 3.40 | 19.15 |
CV (%) | 27.1 | 21.5 | 20 | 26 | 27.9 |
LSD (0.05%) | 11.32 | 21.64 | 4.65 | 0.76 | 6.81 |
P-value | *** | * | *** | *** | ** |
Treatments combination (age*intervals) | Parameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM | Ash | CP | NDF | ADF | LDF | |
60x30 | 85.07 | 15.39a | 14.88a | 35.63b | 16.54ab | 2.82 |
60x45 | 97.43 | 13.69ab | 12.00ab | 37.36b | 16.91ab | 4.89 |
60x60 | 84.23 | 12.51ab | 10.71ab | 39.18b | 17.31ab | 6.66 |
75x30 | 90.00 | 12.96ab | 13.17ab | 35.69b | 16.48ab | 4.24 |
75x45 | 84.56 | 13.24ab | 12.83ab | 36.68b | 16.78ab | 5.12 |
75x60 | 88.70 | 12.15b | 10.07ab | 48.19a | 17.85a | 7.05 |
90x30 | 89.20 | 12.27ab | 11.85ab | 34.84b | 15.86ab | 4.35 |
90x45 | 97.43 | 11.85b | 10.73ab | 37.72b | 16.99ab | 5.17 |
90x60 | 84.10 | 11.5b | 9.23b | 51.09a | 17.14ab | 7.09 |
Overall Mean | 88.97 | 12.84 | 11.72 | 39.60 | 16.87 | 5.27 |
CV (%) | 12.37 | 14.02 | 24.1 | 9.92 | 6.2 | 14.2 |
LSD (0.05%) | 19.05 | 3.12 | 4.89 | 6.78 | 1.81 | 4.65 |
P-value | NS | * | * | ** | * | NS |
Treatment (age*inter) | TDM Kg/ha | TVC | Total revenue | Growth revenue at Wet season | MRR | Total revenue | Growth revenue at Dry season | MRR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60x30 | 24100 | 294560 | 361500 | 66940 | 1.23 | 482000 | 187440 | 1.64 |
60x45 | 23005 | 264560 | 345075 | 80515 | 1.30 | 460100 | 195540 | 1.74 |
60x60 | 21835 | 249560 | 327525 | 77965 | 1.31 | 436700 | 187140 | 1.75 |
75x30 | 21415 | 287060 | 321225 | 34165 | 1.12 | 428300 | 141240 | 1.49 |
75x45 | 30415 | 257060 | 456225 | 199165 | 1.77 | 608300 | 351240 | 2.37 |
75x60 | 20695 | 249560 | 310425 | 60865 | 1.24 | 413900 | 164340 | 1.66 |
90x30 | 23560 | 279560 | 353400 | 73840 | 1.26 | 471200 | 191640 | 1.69 |
90x45 | 22030 | 257060 | 330450 | 73390 | 1.29 | 440600 | 183540 | 1.71 |
90x60 | 20695 | 249560 | 310425 | 60865 | 1.24 | 413900 | 164340 | 1.66 |
ADF | Acid Detergent Fiber |
ADL | Acid Detergent Lignin |
CP | Crude Protein |
DM | Dry Matter |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fiber |
NR | Net Return |
TR | Total Return |
TVC | Total Variable Cost |
[1] |
Alemayehu Mengistu, 2006. Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles: Ethiopia. Available at
http://www.fao.org/AGp/agpc/doc/counprofEthiopia.htm Accessed on 05/01/2015. |
[2] | Ecocrop. 2010. Ecocrop database. FAO. |
[3] | Nabi Husein and Daniel Wana, 2022. Evaluation of Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) Grasses for Adaptability and Yield Performance in Different Agro-Ecologies of East Showa and West Arsi Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia, Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. |
[4] | Asmare B. 2016. Evaluation of the agronomic, utilization, nutritive and feeding value of Desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum). Ph. D. Dissertation. Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. |
[5] | Shiferaw A., Puskur R., Tegegne A., and Hoekstra D., 2011. Innovation in forage development: Empirical evidence from Alaba Special District, Southern Ethiopia. Development in Practice, 21(8), (pp. 1138-1152). |
[6] | Tilahun G., Asmare B., Mekuriaw Y., 2017. Effects of harvesting age and spacing on plant characteristics, chemical composition and yield of Desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.) in the highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Grasslands 5(2): 77-84. |
[7] | Upton, M., 1979. Farm Management in Africa: The principle of production and planning. Oxford University press, Great Britain, 282–98. |
[8] | Tarawali, S. A., G. Tarawali, A. Lirbi and J. Hanson, 1995. Method for the evaluation of Forage legumes, Grasses and Fodder Trees for Feed Use as Livestock Feed. International Livestock research Institute; Nairobi, Kenya. |
[9] | Kjeldahl, J. 1883. "Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern" (New method for the determination of nitrogen in organic substances), Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, 22(1): 366-383. |
[10] | Van Soest, P. V., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10): 3583-3597. |
[11] | Statistical Analysis System (SAS) Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Proprietary software version 9.00. SAS Institute. |
[12] | Kebede Gezahagn, Fekede Feyissa, Mulisa Faji, Kedir Mohammed, Mesfin Dejene, Gezahegn Mengistu, Diriba Geleti, Getnet Assefa, Mengistu Alemayehu, Solomon Mengistu, Alemayehu Mengistu and Aschalew Tsegahun, 2023. Dry matter accumulation dynamics, morphological characteristics and nutritive value of desho (Pennisetum glaucifolium) grass varieties in the central Highlands of Ethiopia. |
[13] | Asmare B, Mekuriaw Y, Tekliye L (2017b). Desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.) evaluation based on plant characteristics, yield, and chemical composition under irrigation in Northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development 112(2): 241-251. |
[14] | Tessema Tesfaye, 2022. Repeated cuttings under farmer management effect on growth and yield performance of Pennisetum glaucifolium varieties in major agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. |
[15] | Hidosa, D., and Getaneh, D., 2021. Evaluation of Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) Grass Varieties for Dry Matter Yield and Chemical Composition under Irrigation in two Districts of South Omo Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences, 15(1), 71-78. |
[16] | Teshale Jabessa, Ketema Bekele, Zinash Amare. 2021. Evaluation of Desho Grass for Their Agronomic Performances and Nutritive Values in Highland and Midland Areas of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Science Research. Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 35-40. |
[17] | Genet Tilahun, Bimrew Asmare and Yeshambel Mekuriaw. 2017. Effects of harvesting age and spacing on plant characteristics, chemical composition, and yield of desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.) in the highlands of Ethiopia. Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales. 5(2): 77–84. |
[18] | Butt NM, 2003. Effect of defoliation on plant growth of Napier grass. Trop Conserv Sci. 2003; 33: 111-120. |
[19] | Bimrew A., Solomon D., Taye T., Firew T., and Wamatu J. 2018a. Appraisal of the mineral content of desho grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.) as affected by stage of maturity and agro-ecologies in Ethiopia. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 3(1): 56- 70. |
[20] | Adane K and Berhan T. 2005. Effects of harvesting frequency and nutrient levels on natural pasture in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Trop. Sci., 45: 77–82. |
[21] | Taye B, Solomon M, and Prasad NK. 2007. Effects of cutting dates on nutritive value of Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass planted sole and in association with Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) or Lablab (Lablab purpureus). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 19, Article #11. |
[22] | Denbela H. and Demerew G. 2021. Evaluation of Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) Grass Varieties for Dry Matter Yield and Chemical Composition under Irrigation in two Districts of South Omo Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences (2021). Volume 15(1) 71-78. |
[23] | Mulisa F, Gezahagn K, Fekede F, Kedir M, Muluneh M, Solomon M, and Aschelew T. 2021. Evaluation of ten perennial forage grasses for biomass and nutritional quality. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales (2021) Vol. 9(3): 292–299. |
[24] | Denbela H, Berako B, and Sintayehu K. 2020. Evaluation of Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) Grass Varieties for Dry Matter Yield and Chemical Composition in South Omo Zone, SouthWestern Ethiopia. Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J. Volume 25 Issue 2 - September 2020. |
[25] | Van Soest P J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, comstock publishing associates. A division of Cornell University, Ithaca and London. |
[26] | Nsahlai I, 1996. Sesbania and lablab supplementation of oat hay basal diet fed to sheep with or without maize grain. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 61: 275-289. |
APA Style
Husein, N., Tilahun, M., Wana, D. (2025). Effect of Harvesting Stage and Cutting Interval on Herbage Yield and Quality of Desho Grass Under Irrigation at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Science Development, 6(3), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13
ACS Style
Husein, N.; Tilahun, M.; Wana, D. Effect of Harvesting Stage and Cutting Interval on Herbage Yield and Quality of Desho Grass Under Irrigation at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Sci. Dev. 2025, 6(3), 60-67. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13
@article{10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13, author = {Nebi Husein and Meseret Tilahun and Daniel Wana}, title = {Effect of Harvesting Stage and Cutting Interval on Herbage Yield and Quality of Desho Grass Under Irrigation at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center }, journal = {Science Development}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {60-67}, doi = {10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scidev.20250603.13}, abstract = {The experiment was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center (on station) for two consecutive years (2021-2022) with the objective to evaluate the effect of harvesting stage and cutting intervals on herbage dry matter yield, other agronomic performances, nutritive value and economic advantages of Desho grass variety (KK1-DZF # 591) produced under irrigation. The treatment contained three levels of harvesting stages (60, 75, and 90) and three cutting times (30, 45 and 60 days). The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design in factorial arrangement with three replications. The data collected from the current study were herbage dry matter yield, yield related agronomic parameters, and chemical composition of the grass. The analysis of variance indicated that plant height, leave length, leaf to stem ratio and herbage dry matter yield were showed significance (P<0.001) variations among the treatments. The highest plant height was recorded from advanced age at cutting interval 60 days and the lowest was from the early harvesting at 30 days. The highest herbage dry matter yield was recorded from treatment harvested every 45 days of cutting interval, after a maximum age of 75, this was due to high number of tillers recorded. The lowest values were recorded long stages of harvesting (90 and 75 days) with long cutting interval (60 days). The highest cutting frequencies were recorded from early harvesting stage (60 days) of cutting interval after every month (30 days) and the lowest was from late harvesting stage (90 days) of cutting interval after two months (60 days). CP, ash NDF and, ADF contents of Desho grass was affected by harvesting stage and cutting interval. The highest mean values of CP and ash contents were recorded from early harvested forage at 30 and 45 days than 60 days of cutting intervals and the lowest was recorded from late of cutting interval. The highest returns were obtained from forage harvested at every 45 days after reach maximum age of 75 days at both seasons. 75x45 treatment combination was good in total dry biomass yield, chemical compositions and high return. Therefore, Desho grass established under irrigation condition harvested after the harvesting stage of 75 days with cutting interval 45 days was recommended for the end user of the study area and similar agro ecology.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Harvesting Stage and Cutting Interval on Herbage Yield and Quality of Desho Grass Under Irrigation at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center AU - Nebi Husein AU - Meseret Tilahun AU - Daniel Wana Y1 - 2025/07/19 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13 DO - 10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13 T2 - Science Development JF - Science Development JO - Science Development SP - 60 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7154 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20250603.13 AB - The experiment was conducted at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center (on station) for two consecutive years (2021-2022) with the objective to evaluate the effect of harvesting stage and cutting intervals on herbage dry matter yield, other agronomic performances, nutritive value and economic advantages of Desho grass variety (KK1-DZF # 591) produced under irrigation. The treatment contained three levels of harvesting stages (60, 75, and 90) and three cutting times (30, 45 and 60 days). The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design in factorial arrangement with three replications. The data collected from the current study were herbage dry matter yield, yield related agronomic parameters, and chemical composition of the grass. The analysis of variance indicated that plant height, leave length, leaf to stem ratio and herbage dry matter yield were showed significance (P<0.001) variations among the treatments. The highest plant height was recorded from advanced age at cutting interval 60 days and the lowest was from the early harvesting at 30 days. The highest herbage dry matter yield was recorded from treatment harvested every 45 days of cutting interval, after a maximum age of 75, this was due to high number of tillers recorded. The lowest values were recorded long stages of harvesting (90 and 75 days) with long cutting interval (60 days). The highest cutting frequencies were recorded from early harvesting stage (60 days) of cutting interval after every month (30 days) and the lowest was from late harvesting stage (90 days) of cutting interval after two months (60 days). CP, ash NDF and, ADF contents of Desho grass was affected by harvesting stage and cutting interval. The highest mean values of CP and ash contents were recorded from early harvested forage at 30 and 45 days than 60 days of cutting intervals and the lowest was recorded from late of cutting interval. The highest returns were obtained from forage harvested at every 45 days after reach maximum age of 75 days at both seasons. 75x45 treatment combination was good in total dry biomass yield, chemical compositions and high return. Therefore, Desho grass established under irrigation condition harvested after the harvesting stage of 75 days with cutting interval 45 days was recommended for the end user of the study area and similar agro ecology. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -