With the increasing of international business activities, studies of business discourse have attracted more and more scholars’ attention, many papers about business discourse have been published in the past two decades, and the research topic of business discourse shows an interdisciplinary development trend. In order to figure out the research status and frontier evolution of domestic research about business discourse, 312 research papers collected in CNKI are selected as the research object in this paper. Since the research object is relatively large, a visualized analysis software CiteSpace is used in this paper to analyze these published papers by drawing knowledge maps in several aspects including authors, institutions, keyword clusters, hot words, etc. Through these maps, the research status including quantity of published papers in each year, authors and organizations of published papers, research hotspot, as well as the frontier evolution in three periods can be summarized. Finally, some suggestions are given for the future business discourse research at home according to both the research status and frontier evolution. (1) The research of business discourse should be more interdisciplinary in the future. (2) The research on Business English should be further strengthened. (3) The text types of business discourse are more abundant.
| Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18 |
| Page(s) | 95-102 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Business Discourse, Research Status, Frontier Evolution
| [1] | F. Bargiela-Chiappini, C. Nickerson, and B. Planken, “Business Discourse,” Palgrave Macmillan Publisher, 2007. |
| [2] | Chaomei Chen, Yue Chen, Jianhua Hou and Yongxia Liang, “CiteSpace II: Identification and visualization of new trends and trends in scientific literature,” Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2009, pp. 401-421. |
| [3] | Lifei Wang and Can Cui, “On the paradigm and methods of interdisciplinary Research in Business English,” Foreign Language World, 2019, pp. 59-64. |
| [4] | Lifei Wang, Hailing Ge and Qingran Wang, “Structuring the Theoretical Framework of Linguistics for Business Discourse,” Foreign Language and Literature, 2016, pp. 46-53. |
| [5] | Lingli Duan and Yaling Xu, “The Direction of Studies of Pragmatics for Business English,” Foreign Language and Literature, 2016, pp. 60-66. |
| [6] | Xiaoguang Li, “A Study on Lexical Construction of Business Discourse Community,” Foreign Language Research, 2016, pp. 67-70. |
| [7] | Xingsong Shi, “Intercultural Business Communication: Theory, Method and Application,” Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 2015, pp. 21-27. |
| [8] | Wenchao Su, Defeng Li, Yuanjian He, “Intension and Extension of Business Translation,” Chinese Science & Technology Translators Journal, 2005, pp. 83-87. |
| [9] | Qun Xie and Yue Zhan, “A Review of Business Negotiation Discourse Study Abroad,” Foreign Language Research, 2018, pp. 68-73. |
| [10] | Hongwan Shao, “A Positive Discourse Analysis of the Pragmatic Strategies Used in the Move Structures of Business Negotiations,” Journal of Yangzhou University, 2011, pp. 121-128. |
| [11] | Libo Wu, “Multimodal discourse analysis of business negotiation,” Business Collection, 2015, pp. 101-103. |
| [12] | Huijuan Ma, “On the diversification of business text translation standards,” Chinese Translators Journal, 2005, pp. 81-84. |
| [13] | Wen Bao, “A study on macro strategies of business E-C / C-E Translation,” Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2015, pp. 20-25. |
| [14] | Lin Li, “Critical cognitive analysis of enterprise development report in China,” Foreign Languages Research, 2020, pp. 20-28. |
| [15] | Hui Li, “A Corpus-based Study of Discourse Markers in Business English Speeches,” Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 2016, pp. 25-32. |
| [16] | Lifei Wang and Daorong Wen, “A Corpus Study on Semantic Categories and POS Distribution Patterns in Business English Contracts,” Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 2017, pp. 12-20. |
| [17] | Yinyan Yao and Xiaoyan Chen, “An Analysis of Multimodal Video Discourses: Taking a Corporate Television Advertisement as an Example,” Foreign Language and Literature, 2013, pp. 86-91. |
| [18] | Lifei Wang and Fang Han, “A Contrastive Move Analysis between Chinese and English Corporate Annual Reports,” Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2015, pp. 1-9+107+159. |
| [19] | Juyuan Li, “Intertextual critical discourse analysis -- Taking advertising discourse as an example,” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2008, pp. 16-20. |
| [20] | Wei Feng and Dongying Wu, “Co-Constructing Corporate Identities by Followers on Corporate Social Media,” Linguistic Research, 2019, pp. 164-176. |
| [21] | Xingsong Shi and Xiaohui Shan, “A Corpus-based Study on Linguistic and Cross-cultural Adaptation of Chinese Corporate Websites,” Foreign Languages in China, 2019, pp. 71-80. |
| [22] | Zuocheng Zhang and Yan Wang, “Definition of Business English,” International Business, 2002, pp. 51-56. |
| [23] | F. Bargiela-Chiappini, “The Handbook of Business Discourse,” Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. |
| [24] | V. Bhatia, “Analyzing Genre, Language Use in Professional Settings,” London: Longman, 1993. K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished. |
| [25] | N. Fairclough, “Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language,” Harlow, England: Longman, 1995. |
APA Style
Xiangmin Li, Yinuo Zhou. (2022). Research Status and Frontier Evolution of Domestic Business Discourse Between 2000 and 2020. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18
ACS Style
Xiangmin Li; Yinuo Zhou. Research Status and Frontier Evolution of Domestic Business Discourse Between 2000 and 2020. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 10(2), 95-102. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18,
author = {Xiangmin Li and Yinuo Zhou},
title = {Research Status and Frontier Evolution of Domestic Business Discourse Between 2000 and 2020},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {95-102},
doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20221002.18},
abstract = {With the increasing of international business activities, studies of business discourse have attracted more and more scholars’ attention, many papers about business discourse have been published in the past two decades, and the research topic of business discourse shows an interdisciplinary development trend. In order to figure out the research status and frontier evolution of domestic research about business discourse, 312 research papers collected in CNKI are selected as the research object in this paper. Since the research object is relatively large, a visualized analysis software CiteSpace is used in this paper to analyze these published papers by drawing knowledge maps in several aspects including authors, institutions, keyword clusters, hot words, etc. Through these maps, the research status including quantity of published papers in each year, authors and organizations of published papers, research hotspot, as well as the frontier evolution in three periods can be summarized. Finally, some suggestions are given for the future business discourse research at home according to both the research status and frontier evolution. (1) The research of business discourse should be more interdisciplinary in the future. (2) The research on Business English should be further strengthened. (3) The text types of business discourse are more abundant.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Research Status and Frontier Evolution of Domestic Business Discourse Between 2000 and 2020 AU - Xiangmin Li AU - Yinuo Zhou Y1 - 2022/03/29 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 95 EP - 102 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.18 AB - With the increasing of international business activities, studies of business discourse have attracted more and more scholars’ attention, many papers about business discourse have been published in the past two decades, and the research topic of business discourse shows an interdisciplinary development trend. In order to figure out the research status and frontier evolution of domestic research about business discourse, 312 research papers collected in CNKI are selected as the research object in this paper. Since the research object is relatively large, a visualized analysis software CiteSpace is used in this paper to analyze these published papers by drawing knowledge maps in several aspects including authors, institutions, keyword clusters, hot words, etc. Through these maps, the research status including quantity of published papers in each year, authors and organizations of published papers, research hotspot, as well as the frontier evolution in three periods can be summarized. Finally, some suggestions are given for the future business discourse research at home according to both the research status and frontier evolution. (1) The research of business discourse should be more interdisciplinary in the future. (2) The research on Business English should be further strengthened. (3) The text types of business discourse are more abundant. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: