This study uses the concept of diversity from Science applying it to Social Studies to understand the diversity of relationships and inputs present in human everyday living. Diversity requires a multi-ethnical, cultural, age, gender, religious background to be developed. This means diversity in relationships need diversity as a concept in all human relations. Diverse living and lifestyle can potentially support the individual through harsh periods meanwhile diminishing prejudice and intolerance. The present study applied the Diversity Survey Questionnaire (DSQ) containing 47 questions (40 questions using a 5-multiple choice scale ranging from always to never, and 7 questions with written answers). A total of 333 individuals participated in the research. The DSQ was created by Dr. Monica Mastrantonio to measure how diverse and inclusive a person’s life be can possibly be. The results were collected and measured using the Google platform, and automatically using metrics to reach quantitative results. The collected data shows that diversity has crucial importance in everyday living. Nevertheless, data also showed that people lack significant opportunities to engage in multiple life experiences. Participants also agreed on various aspects that can be done to improve diversity as a method of living. It is concluded that this survey brought important aspects in how people engage in a plural and diverse society, and what needs to be done in that direction.
| Published in | Science Frontiers (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11 |
| Page(s) | 60-65 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Diversity, Everyday Living, Globalization, UN Goals, Digital Humanities
| [1] | Alan, L. I. U. (2020) Toward a Diversity Stack: Digital Humanities and Diversity as Technical Problem. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 135.1 (2020): 130-51. Web. |
| [2] | Baron, Robert A. Byrne, Donn Erwin. (2000) Social Psychology 9th ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon. |
| [3] | Donald, James. (2007) Internationalization, Diversity, and the Humanities Curriculum: Cosmopolitanism and Multiculturalism Revisited. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007. |
| [4] | Handley, Mark. (2011) Dying on Foreign Shores: Travel and Mobility in the Late-Antique West. Journal of Roman Archaeology Suppl. 86, 2011. |
| [5] | Haworth, John T.; Hart, Graham. (2007). Well-being: individual, community, and social perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| [6] | Holmes, G. (2015) What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Biodiversity Conservation in the Anthropocene? Environment and Society, 6 (1). pp. 87-108. ISSN 2150-6779. |
| [7] | Mastrantonio, Monica. (2021) Diversity Survey Questionnaire. Fully available at https://forms.gle/QibeyV3oe4kFYYZa7 Open Source. Ongoing. |
| [8] | McLuhan, Marshall. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. |
| [9] | Morris S. C. (1998). The evolution of diversity in ancient ecosystems: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353 (1366), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0213 |
| [10] | Ramirez, Francisco; Bromley, Patricia; Garnett Russell, Susan. (2009) The Valorization of Humanity and Diversity. Multicultural Education Review 1. 1 (2009): 29-54. Web. DOI: 10.1080/23770031.2009.11102862. |
| [11] | Rescher, Nicholas. (1985) The Strife of Systems: An Essay on the Grounds and Implications of Philosophical Diversity. Pittsburgh, Pa.: U of Pittsburgh, 1985. Print. |
| [12] | Spence, Paul Joseph, and Renata Brandao. 2021. “Towards Language Sensitivity and Diversity in the Digital Humanities.” Digital Studies/Le champ numérique 11 (1): 9, pp. 1–29. DOI: https://doi. org/10.16995/dscn.8098. |
| [13] | Swartz, T; Palermo, A.; Masur, S; Aberg, J. The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 220, Issue Supplement_2, 15 September 2019, Pages S33–S41, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz174 |
| [14] | Turner, Caroline S. (2015). Mentoring as transformative practice: supporting student and faculty diversity. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass. |
| [15] | Widmer, Eric D. (1966) Family configurations: a structural approach to family diversity. Farnham: Ashgate. |
| [16] | Wilson, Doirean; Baruch, Yehuda; Boulaye, Patti; Hartog, Mary. (2015) Is this your cultural place or mine? A global and personal career life-course journey perspective of diversity. Human resource management international digest, 2015-07-13, Vol. 23 (5), p. 2-4. |
APA Style
Monica Mastrantonio, Raveenthiran Vivekanantharasa, Lidia Martinez. (2022). Diversity in Daily Living – An International Survey for Individual Practices. Science Frontiers, 3(2), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11
ACS Style
Monica Mastrantonio; Raveenthiran Vivekanantharasa; Lidia Martinez. Diversity in Daily Living – An International Survey for Individual Practices. Sci. Front. 2022, 3(2), 60-65. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11,
author = {Monica Mastrantonio and Raveenthiran Vivekanantharasa and Lidia Martinez},
title = {Diversity in Daily Living – An International Survey for Individual Practices},
journal = {Science Frontiers},
volume = {3},
number = {2},
pages = {60-65},
doi = {10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sf.20220302.11},
abstract = {This study uses the concept of diversity from Science applying it to Social Studies to understand the diversity of relationships and inputs present in human everyday living. Diversity requires a multi-ethnical, cultural, age, gender, religious background to be developed. This means diversity in relationships need diversity as a concept in all human relations. Diverse living and lifestyle can potentially support the individual through harsh periods meanwhile diminishing prejudice and intolerance. The present study applied the Diversity Survey Questionnaire (DSQ) containing 47 questions (40 questions using a 5-multiple choice scale ranging from always to never, and 7 questions with written answers). A total of 333 individuals participated in the research. The DSQ was created by Dr. Monica Mastrantonio to measure how diverse and inclusive a person’s life be can possibly be. The results were collected and measured using the Google platform, and automatically using metrics to reach quantitative results. The collected data shows that diversity has crucial importance in everyday living. Nevertheless, data also showed that people lack significant opportunities to engage in multiple life experiences. Participants also agreed on various aspects that can be done to improve diversity as a method of living. It is concluded that this survey brought important aspects in how people engage in a plural and diverse society, and what needs to be done in that direction.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Diversity in Daily Living – An International Survey for Individual Practices AU - Monica Mastrantonio AU - Raveenthiran Vivekanantharasa AU - Lidia Martinez Y1 - 2022/04/29 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11 T2 - Science Frontiers JF - Science Frontiers JO - Science Frontiers SP - 60 EP - 65 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7030 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20220302.11 AB - This study uses the concept of diversity from Science applying it to Social Studies to understand the diversity of relationships and inputs present in human everyday living. Diversity requires a multi-ethnical, cultural, age, gender, religious background to be developed. This means diversity in relationships need diversity as a concept in all human relations. Diverse living and lifestyle can potentially support the individual through harsh periods meanwhile diminishing prejudice and intolerance. The present study applied the Diversity Survey Questionnaire (DSQ) containing 47 questions (40 questions using a 5-multiple choice scale ranging from always to never, and 7 questions with written answers). A total of 333 individuals participated in the research. The DSQ was created by Dr. Monica Mastrantonio to measure how diverse and inclusive a person’s life be can possibly be. The results were collected and measured using the Google platform, and automatically using metrics to reach quantitative results. The collected data shows that diversity has crucial importance in everyday living. Nevertheless, data also showed that people lack significant opportunities to engage in multiple life experiences. Participants also agreed on various aspects that can be done to improve diversity as a method of living. It is concluded that this survey brought important aspects in how people engage in a plural and diverse society, and what needs to be done in that direction. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: