International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies in Selected Moisture Deficit Areas of North and East Shewa Zones of the Amhara and Oromia Regional States, Ethiopia

Tef (Eragrostis Tef) is one of the most important cereal crops in Ethiopia and holds significant importance for food security, nutrition, and income generation for smallholder farmers. However, its production faces various challenges, including low yields, which is caused by limited access to improved varieties and lack of knowledge on best agronomic practices. The study was aimed at enhancing the adoption of new tef technologies by raising farmers' awareness towards better management practices in the study area. The newly released Boni variety along with the standard checks (Bora and Boset) was demonstrated during the 2022 main cropping season. Yield data was collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The farmers preference and feedback were evaluated using direct ranking and narration respectively. The finding showed that the highest grain yield (2.22 tha–1) was obtained from Bora variety in the Minjar Shenkora district of North Shewa zone, Amhara regional state. Conversely, the lowest average yield (1.84 tha–1) was recorded from Boni variety in the Bora district of East Shewa zone, Oromia regional state. The yield increment of Boni over Bora ranges from -4.2% to 1.0% across the districts. Furthermore, comparing Boni to the Boset variety, Boni consistently demonstrated higher yields, with yield advantages ranging from -1.1% in the Bora district to 7.2% in the Boset district. In contrast, the yield advantage of Boni over farmers' practices varies across districts, ranging from -14.4% in Bora district to 5.9% in Minjar Shenkora district. Similarly, Boni variety was selected first, followed by Bora and Boset varieties in Boset and Bora districts, while Bora variety was selected first followed by Boni and Boset variety in the Liben Chiquala and Minjar Shenkora districts. Therefore, it is recommended to promote the selected varieties in the specific target areas as well as other similar agro-ecological areas by involving all the concerned stakeholders at different levels.

Eragrostis Tef, Grain Yield, Moisture Deficit, Preference Ranking, Tef, Variety

Mohammed Ahmed, Truayinet Mekuriaw, Yazachew Genet, Abune Gudeta, Wubshet Chiche, et al. (2023). Pre-Extension Demonstration of Newly Released Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies in Selected Moisture Deficit Areas of North and East Shewa Zones of the Amhara and Oromia Regional States, Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 9(5), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.11

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. CSA (Central Statistical Agency), “The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Report on Area and Production of Major Crops,” Stat. Bull., vol. I, p. 132, 2022.
2. K. Assefa et al., “Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter],” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 6, no. MAR, pp. 1–13, 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00177.
3. FAO, Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter, no. January 1997. 2014.
4. K. Baye, “Synopsis : Teff : nutrient composition and health benefits,” no. October, 2014.
5. USDA, “Agriculture Resource MAnagement Survey arms 3,” 2020.
6. L. Spaenij-Dekking, Y. Kooy-Winkelaar, and F. Koning, “The Ethiopian Cereal Tef in Celiac Disease,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 1748–1749, 2005, doi: 10.1056/nejmc051492.
7. R. Andersen and T. Winge, The Access and Benefit-Sharing Agreement on Teff Genetic Resources. 2012.
8. S. Chanyalew et al., Tef Breeding Manual. Debre Zeit, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, National Tef Research Program, 2021.
9. K. A. and L. Z. Setotaw Ferede, “Tef production, marketing and trade in Ethiopia,” in Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement, D. G. and Z. T. Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew, Ed., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and Agricultural Transformation Institute (ATI), 2022, pp. 449–488.
10. K. Assefa, S. Chanyalew, Z. Tadele, and H. Jifar, Tef breeding, no. November. 2022.
11. FAO, “Analysis of price incentives for teff in Ethiopia for the time period Analysis of price incentives for teff in Ethiopia for the time period www.fao.org/in-action/mafap,” no. February, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4523e.pdf
12. T. M. Abate, T. M. Mekie, and A. B. Dessie, “Determinants of market outlet choices by smallholder teff farmers in Dera district, South Gondar Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia: a multivariate probit approach,” J. Econ. Struct., vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40008-019-0167-x.
13. M. Dereje, B. Minten, A. S. Taffesse, Seneshaw, Tamru, and and I. Worku, “Tef Value Chain in Ethiopia,” in Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement, D. G. and Z. T. ebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew, Ed., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian I nstitute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and Agricultural Transformation Institute (ATI), pp. 521–545.
14. S. Chanyalew, Tef Breeding Manual, no. April. 2022. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26026.08642.
15. A. Yami, Achievements and Prospects of Tef Improvement: 2013.
16. A. Yami, Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]: A valuable Food and Feed Resource. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2016.
17. A. Yami, T. Berhanu, K. Gebremeskel, Seyoum, Bediye, and and A. Tolera, “TEF: AN INVALUABLE LIVESTOCK FEED RESOURCE,” in Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement, A. Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew, Dejene Girma and Z. (Eds. Tadele, Eds., Principles and Practices of Tef Improvement: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and Agricultural Transformation Institute (ATI), 2022, pp. 373–415.
18. K. Assefa, J. K. Yu, M. Zeid, G. Belay, H. Tefera, and M. E. Sorrells, “Breeding tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) trotter]: Conventional and molecular approaches,” Plant Breed., vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01782.x.
19. M. Ayele, “Use of excised leaf water content in breeding tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc). Trotter] for moisture stress area,” Acta Agron. Hungarica, vol. 42, pp. 261–265, 1993.
20. A. Takele, “Canopy temperatures and excised leaf water loss of tef (Eragrostis TEF [Zucc.] trotter.) cultivars under water deficit conditions at anthesis,” Acta Agron. Hungarica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 2001, doi: 10.1556/AAgr.49.2001.2.1.
21. B. Minten, T. Seneshaw, E. Ermias, and K. Tadesse, “Ethiopia’s Value Chains on the Move: The Case of Teff. ESSP (Ethiopian Strategic Support Program),” no. April, 2013.
22. MoA (Ministry of Agriculture), “Plant Variety Release, Protection and Seed Quality Control Directorate, Crop Variety Register,” 24.
23. K. Assefa, S. Chanyalew, and Z. Tadele, Tef, Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter, no. January. 2017. doi: 10.1002/9781119130765.ch9.
24. S. Chanyalew et al., “Significance and prospects of an orphan crop tef,” Planta, vol. 250, no. 3, pp. 753–767, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03209-z.
25. A. Teshome, B. Amsalu, and E. Gabrekiristos, “On-farm Improved Common Bean Variety Demonstration and Evaluation in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia : Case of Bora and Adami Tullu Jido Kombolcha Districts,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 221–232, 2022.
26. R. B. Yadav, D. B.; Kamboj, B. R.; Garg, “Increasing the productivity and profitability of sunflower through front line demonstrations in irrigated agro-ecosystem of eastern Haryana,” Haryana J. Agron., vol. 20, no. 1/2, p. Haryana Journal of Agronomy 20 (1/2): 33-35, 2004.