This study proposes a novel approach for real-time strength monitoring and risk assessment of building structures by leveraging machine learning for concrete compressive strength prediction. The assessment of the prevailing Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings for a seismic damage is a hard structural engineering trouble and a key problem for disaster mitigation and resilience. The seismic damage evaluation of those structures aids in figuring out whether or not the buildings can be used effectively after the earthquake by knowing the chance of damage degrees. We developed a machine learning model capable of analyzing various concrete mix parameters, including the amount of cement, slag, fly ash, water, superplasticizer, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and the age of the concrete. The model predicts the compressive strength, a crucial indicator of a RCC column's structural integrity. In structural engineering, assessing the seismic susceptibility of the existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is a critical task that is essential to resilience and catastrophe preparedness. Seismic Risk Assessments (SRA) of these structures help determine whether a building is safe for post-earthquake use by tracking the likelihood of damage. approach allows for continuous assessment of a building's structural health, enabling proactive identification of potential risks. The inclusion of this technology into current monitoring systems offers building managers and engineers actionable insights which help them make informed decisions about maintenance and repair requirements. This research establishes new methods for proactive and effective building structure risk assessment which improves safety and extends the life span of constructed environments.
| Published in | American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 13, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14 |
| Page(s) | 362-372 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Concrete Compressive Strength, Strength Monitoring, Risk Assessment, Machine Learning, Structural Health, Reinforced Concrete
| [1] | Ferreira, T. M., R. Maio, and R. Vicente (2017). Analysis of the impact of large-scale seismic retrofitting strategies through the application of a vulnerability-based approach on traditional masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(2), 329–48. |
| [2] | Kindahunsi, A. A., Uzoegbo (2015). H. C. Strength and Durability Properties of concrete with starch Admixture. J. Concr. Mater., 9, 323–335. |
| [3] | Kim, H. S.; Lee, S. H., Moon (2007), H. Y. Strength properties and durability aspects of high strength concrete using Korean metakaolin. Constr. Build. Mater., 21, 1229-1237. |
| [4] | Behnood, A. & Golafshani (2022), E. M. Artificial intelligence to model the performance of concrete mixtures and elements: A review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. |
| [5] | Ben Chaabene, W., Flah, M. & Nehdi (2020), M. L. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. |
| [6] | Nguyen, H., Vu, T., Vo, T. P. & Thai (2021), H. T. Efficient machine learning models for prediction of concrete strengths. Constr. Build. Mater. |
| [7] | Kausay T, Simon T (2005), Acceptance of Concrete Compressive Strength. 1-19. |
| [8] | Megid, W. A., Chainey, M. A., Lebrun, P., Hay (2019), D. R. Monitoring fatigue cracks on eye bars of steel bridges using acoustic emission: A case study. Eng. Fract. Mech., 211, 198-208. |
| [9] | Zhang, T.; Mahdi, M.; Issa, M.; Xu, C.; Ozevin, D. (2023), Experimental study on monitoring damage progression of basalt-FRP reinforced concrete slabs using acoustic emission and machine learning. Sensors, 23, 8356. |
| [10] | Bado, M. F.; Casas, J. R.; Kaklauskas, G.(2021), Distributed Sensing (DOFS) in reinforced concrete members for reinforcement strain monitoring, crack detection and bond-slip calculation. Eng. Struct., 226, 111385. |
| [11] | Fernandez, I.; Berrocal, C. G.; Almfeldt, S.; Rempling, R. Monitoring of new and existing stainless-steel reinforced concrete structures by clad distributed optical fibre sensing. |
| [12] | Eslamlou, A. D.; Ghaderiaram, A.; Schlangen, E.; Fotouhi, M.(2023), A review on non-destructive evaluation of construction materials and structures using magnetic sensors. Constr. Build. Mater., 397, 132460. |
| [13] | Chen, H.; Zhou, M.; Gan, S.; Nie, X.; Xu, B.; Mo, Y. L.(2021), Review of wave method-based non-destructive testing for steel-concrete composite structures: Multiscale simulation and multi-physics coupling analysis. Constr. Build. Mater., 302, 123832. |
| [14] | Gavarini, C.(2021), Seismic risk in historical centers. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 21, 459-466. |
| [15] | FEMA 249. (1994). Assessment of the State-of-the-Art Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodologies. |
| [16] | Meirovitch, L. (1967). Analytical Methods in Vibrations, Macmillan, New York. |
| [17] | Yao, J. T. P. (1985). Safety and Reliability of Existing Structures, Pitman, Boston, 130 pp. |
| [18] | Joslyn, C. and Booker, J. (2005). Generalized Information Theory for Engineering Modeling and Simulation, Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, ed. E Nikolaidis et al., pp. 9: 1-40, CRC press. |
| [19] | Hwang SH, Mangalathu S, Shin J, Jeon JS.(2021), Machine learning-based approaches for seismic demand and collapse of ductile reinforced concrete building frames. J Build Eng., 34. |
| [20] | Lu X, Plevris V, Tsiatas G, De Domenico D.(2022), Artificial intelligence-powered methodologies and applications in earthquake and structural engineering. Front Built Environ., 43. |
| [21] | Xie Y, Ebad Sichani M, Padgett JE, DesRoches R.(2020), The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: a state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra., 36(4), 1769-1801. |
| [22] | Harirchian E, Hosseini SE, Jadhav K,(2021), A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings. J Build Eng., 43. |
| [23] | Harirchian, E.(2015). Constructability Comparison Between IBS and Conventional Construction. Ph.D. Thesis, University Technology Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia, 20. |
| [24] | Worden K, Green PL.(2017), A machine learning approach to nonlinear modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process, 84, 34-53. |
| [25] | Oh BK, Glisic B, Park SW, Park HS.(2020), Neural network-based seismic response prediction model for building structures using artificial earthquakes. J Sound Vib., 468. |
| [26] | Luo H, Paal SG.(2022), Artificial intelligence-enhanced seismic response prediction of reinforced concrete frames. Adv Eng Inform., 52. |
| [27] | Chelidze T, Kiria T, Melikadze G, Jimsheladze T, Kobzev G.(2022), Earthquake forecast as a machine learning problem for imbalanced datasets: example of Georgia, Caucasus. Front Earth Sci., 10. |
| [28] | Morfidis K, Kostinakis K.(2017), Seismic parameters’ combinations for the optimum prediction of the damage 14 state of R/C buildings using neural networks. Adv Eng Software., 10. |
| [29] | Tang Q, Dang J, Cui Y, Wang X, Jia J.(2021), Machine learning-based fast seismic risk assessment of building structures. J Earthquake Eng., 1-22. |
| [30] | Zhang Y, Burton HV, Sun H, Shokrabadi M.(2018), A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety. Struct Saf., 72, 1-16. |
| [31] | Burton HV, Sreekumar S, Sharma M, Sun H.(2017), Estimating aftershock collapse vulnerability using mainshock intensity, structural response, and physical damage indicators. Struct Saf., 68. |
| [32] | Kazemi F, Mohebi B, Jankowski R.(2021), Predicting the seismic collapse capacity of adjacent SMRFs retrofitted with fluid viscous dampers in pounding condition. Mech Syst Signal Process., 161. |
| [33] | Kourehpaz, P., & Hutt, C. M. (2022), Machine Learning for Enhanced Seismic Damage Assessment of Buildings, |
APA Style
Padelkar, S., Narwade, R., Nagarajan, K., Narwade, R. (2025). Real Time Strength Monitoring of Concrete and Risk Assessment of Building Structures Using Machine Learning. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(6), 362-372. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14
ACS Style
Padelkar, S.; Narwade, R.; Nagarajan, K.; Narwade, R. Real Time Strength Monitoring of Concrete and Risk Assessment of Building Structures Using Machine Learning. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2025, 13(6), 362-372. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14,
author = {Shreyanshu Padelkar and Raju Narwade and Karthik Nagarajan and Rajashri Narwade},
title = {Real Time Strength Monitoring of Concrete and Risk Assessment of Building Structures Using Machine Learning},
journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
pages = {362-372},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20251306.14},
abstract = {This study proposes a novel approach for real-time strength monitoring and risk assessment of building structures by leveraging machine learning for concrete compressive strength prediction. The assessment of the prevailing Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings for a seismic damage is a hard structural engineering trouble and a key problem for disaster mitigation and resilience. The seismic damage evaluation of those structures aids in figuring out whether or not the buildings can be used effectively after the earthquake by knowing the chance of damage degrees. We developed a machine learning model capable of analyzing various concrete mix parameters, including the amount of cement, slag, fly ash, water, superplasticizer, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and the age of the concrete. The model predicts the compressive strength, a crucial indicator of a RCC column's structural integrity. In structural engineering, assessing the seismic susceptibility of the existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is a critical task that is essential to resilience and catastrophe preparedness. Seismic Risk Assessments (SRA) of these structures help determine whether a building is safe for post-earthquake use by tracking the likelihood of damage. approach allows for continuous assessment of a building's structural health, enabling proactive identification of potential risks. The inclusion of this technology into current monitoring systems offers building managers and engineers actionable insights which help them make informed decisions about maintenance and repair requirements. This research establishes new methods for proactive and effective building structure risk assessment which improves safety and extends the life span of constructed environments.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Real Time Strength Monitoring of Concrete and Risk Assessment of Building Structures Using Machine Learning AU - Shreyanshu Padelkar AU - Raju Narwade AU - Karthik Nagarajan AU - Rajashri Narwade Y1 - 2025/12/20 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14 T2 - American Journal of Civil Engineering JF - American Journal of Civil Engineering JO - American Journal of Civil Engineering SP - 362 EP - 372 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20251306.14 AB - This study proposes a novel approach for real-time strength monitoring and risk assessment of building structures by leveraging machine learning for concrete compressive strength prediction. The assessment of the prevailing Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings for a seismic damage is a hard structural engineering trouble and a key problem for disaster mitigation and resilience. The seismic damage evaluation of those structures aids in figuring out whether or not the buildings can be used effectively after the earthquake by knowing the chance of damage degrees. We developed a machine learning model capable of analyzing various concrete mix parameters, including the amount of cement, slag, fly ash, water, superplasticizer, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and the age of the concrete. The model predicts the compressive strength, a crucial indicator of a RCC column's structural integrity. In structural engineering, assessing the seismic susceptibility of the existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is a critical task that is essential to resilience and catastrophe preparedness. Seismic Risk Assessments (SRA) of these structures help determine whether a building is safe for post-earthquake use by tracking the likelihood of damage. approach allows for continuous assessment of a building's structural health, enabling proactive identification of potential risks. The inclusion of this technology into current monitoring systems offers building managers and engineers actionable insights which help them make informed decisions about maintenance and repair requirements. This research establishes new methods for proactive and effective building structure risk assessment which improves safety and extends the life span of constructed environments. VL - 13 IS - 6 ER -