Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

A Multi-Temporal Land Cover Analysis of Kathmandu Using Google Earth Engine and ENVI: A Comparative Study of SVM and RF Algorithms

Received: 22 September 2025     Accepted: 5 October 2025     Published: 28 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Rapid urbanization and land cover change have emerged as major environmental concerns in developing regions, particularly within the Kathmandu District of Nepal. This study aims to analyze multi-temporal land cover changes and compare the performance of two machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF)—across two platforms: Google Earth Engine (GEE) and ENVI. Sentinel-2 satellite imagery from 2017, 2020, and 2023 was utilized to classify four major land cover classes (water, bareland, built-up, and vegetation) using supervised classification techniques. Preprocessing included cloud masking, filtering, and subsetting, while training samples were generated from high-resolution Google Earth Pro and Copernicus Sentinel imagery. Accuracy was assessed using user’s accuracy, producer’s accuracy, overall accuracy, and the Kappa coefficient derived from confusion matrices. Results indicate a steady increase in built-up areas (from 24.75% in 2017 to 37.06% in 2023) and bareland, alongside a marked decline in vegetation. The RF algorithm in GEE achieved the highest performance with an overall accuracy of 98.43% and Kappa coefficient of 0.9773 in 2023, demonstrating strong stability across all years. SVM, while slightly less consistent, achieved 97.6% user accuracy and 98.8% producer accuracy for the water class in 2023, outperforming RF in that category. ENVI-based SVM models attained an overall accuracy of 91.96% and Kappa coefficient of 0.8862, performing well for vegetation but showing slightly lower robustness than RF in GEE. In conclusion, the integration of cloud-based (GEE) and desktop (ENVI) remote sensing platforms with machine learning algorithms proved highly effective for large-scale urban monitoring. The findings highlight rapid urban expansion and vegetation loss in Kathmandu and offer valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and environmental management.

Published in American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12
Page(s) 167-182
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Land Cover Change, Google Earth Engine (GEE), ENVI, SVM, RF, Urban Expansion

References
[1] Mir, Y. H. et al. (2025). Overview of Land Use and Land Cover Change and Its Impacts on Natural Resources. In: Jatav, H. S., Raiput, V. D., Minkina, T. (eds) Ecologically Mediated Development. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, vol 41. Springer, Singapore.
[2] Assede, E. S. P., Orou, H., Biaou, S. S. H. et al. Understanding Drivers of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Africa: A Review. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 8, 62-72 (2023).
[3] Kouassi J-L, Gyau A, Diby L, Bene Y, Kouamé C. Assessing Land Use and Land Cover Change and Farmers’ Perceptions of Deforestation and Land Degradation in South-West Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa. Land. 2021; 10(4): 429.
[4] Liu, H., Fang, C., Miao, Y. et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of population and urbanization in the countries along the Belt and Road 1950-2050. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 919-936 (2018).
[5] Luqman, M., Rayner, P. J. & Gurney, K. R. On the impact of urbanisation on CO2 emissions. npj Urban Sustain 3, 6 (2023).
[6] Joshi, D. R. (2023). Urbanization Trend in Nepal. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 6(1), 51-62.
[7] Timsina, Netra Prasad, Shrestha, Anushiya, Poudel, Dilli Prasad, & Upadhyaya, Rachana. (2020). Trend of urban growth in Nepal with a focus in Kathmandu Valley: A review of processes and drivers of change.
[8] Naboureh, A.; Ebrahimy, H.; Azadbakht, M.; Bian, J.; Amani, M. RUESVMs: An Ensemble Method to Handle the Class Imbalance Problem in Land Cover Mapping Using Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3484,
[9] Li, X.; Gong, P.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Bai, Y.; Chen, B.; Hu, T.; Xiao, Y.; Xu, B.; Yang, J.; et al. Mapping Global Urban Boundaries from the Global Artificial Impervious Area (GAIA) Data. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 094044,
[10] Oluibukun Gbenga Ajayi, Amos Ojima, Performance evaluation of selected cloud occlusion removal algorithms on remote sensing imagery, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, Volume 25, 2022, 100700, ISSN 2352-9385,
[11] Yousefi S, Mirzaee S, Almohamad H, Al Dughairi AA, Gomez C, Siamian N, Alrasheedi M, Abdo HG. Image Classification and Land Cover Mapping Using Sentinel-2 Imagery: Optimization of SVM Parameters. Land. 2022; 11(7): 993.
[12] A. Ramezan, C., A. Warner, T., & E. Maxwell, A. (2019). Evaluation of Sampling and Cross-Validation Tuning Strategies for Regional-Scale Machine Learning Classification. Remote Sensing, 11(2), 185.
[13] F A Islami et al 2022 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 950 01209,
[14] Baccari, N., Hamza, M. H., Slama, T. et al. Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques in Mapping Land Use/Land Cover Changes in a Semi-Arid Environment. Earth Syst Environ 9, 519-539 (2025).
[15] Huang, X., Li, J., Yang, J. et al. 30 m global impervious surface area dynamics and urban expansion pattern observed by Landsat satellites: From 1972 to 2019. Sci. China Earth Sci. 64, 1922-1933 (2021).
[16] Y. Tu et al., "Improved Mapping Results of 10 m Resolution Land Cover Classification in Guangdong, China Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data With Google Earth Engine," in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 13, pp. 5384-5397, 2020,
[17] Nath, A., Koley, B., Choudhury, T., Saraswati, S., Ray, B. C., Um, J.-S., & Sharma, A. (2023). Assessing Coastal Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Dynamics Using Geospatial Techniques. Sustainability, 15(9), 7398.
[18] Shrestha, H. L. (2021). Trends in Urban Expansion in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal (Doctoral dissertation, University of Salzburg, Austria).
[19] Atefe Arfa, Masoud Minaei, Utilizing multitemporal indices and spectral bands of Sentinel-2 to enhance land use and land cover classification with random forest and support vector machine, Advances in Space Research, Volume 74, Issue 11, 2024, Pages 5580-5590, ISSN 0273-1177,
[20] Giles M. Foody, Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, Volume 239, 2020, 111630, ISSN 0034-4257,
[21] Verma, P., Raghubanshi, A., Srivastava, P. K. et al. Appraisal of kappa-based metrics and disagreement indices of accuracy assessment for parametric and nonparametric techniques used in LULC classification and change detection. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 6, 1045-1059 (2020).
[22] Dettori JR, Norvell DC. Kappa and Beyond: Is There Agreement? Global Spine Journal. 2020; 10(4): 499-501.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Bisht, B. S., Subedi, N., Bisht, G., Yadav, A. (2025). A Multi-Temporal Land Cover Analysis of Kathmandu Using Google Earth Engine and ENVI: A Comparative Study of SVM and RF Algorithms. American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 9(4), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Bisht, B. S.; Subedi, N.; Bisht, G.; Yadav, A. A Multi-Temporal Land Cover Analysis of Kathmandu Using Google Earth Engine and ENVI: A Comparative Study of SVM and RF Algorithms. Am. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2025, 9(4), 167-182. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Bisht BS, Subedi N, Bisht G, Yadav A. A Multi-Temporal Land Cover Analysis of Kathmandu Using Google Earth Engine and ENVI: A Comparative Study of SVM and RF Algorithms. Am J Environ Sci Eng. 2025;9(4):167-182. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12,
      author = {Bhuwan Singh Bisht and Nabaraj Subedi and Gaurav Bisht and Amit Yadav},
      title = {A Multi-Temporal Land Cover Analysis of Kathmandu Using Google Earth Engine and ENVI: A Comparative Study of SVM and RF Algorithms
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {167-182},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajese.20250904.12},
      abstract = {Rapid urbanization and land cover change have emerged as major environmental concerns in developing regions, particularly within the Kathmandu District of Nepal. This study aims to analyze multi-temporal land cover changes and compare the performance of two machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF)—across two platforms: Google Earth Engine (GEE) and ENVI. Sentinel-2 satellite imagery from 2017, 2020, and 2023 was utilized to classify four major land cover classes (water, bareland, built-up, and vegetation) using supervised classification techniques. Preprocessing included cloud masking, filtering, and subsetting, while training samples were generated from high-resolution Google Earth Pro and Copernicus Sentinel imagery. Accuracy was assessed using user’s accuracy, producer’s accuracy, overall accuracy, and the Kappa coefficient derived from confusion matrices. Results indicate a steady increase in built-up areas (from 24.75% in 2017 to 37.06% in 2023) and bareland, alongside a marked decline in vegetation. The RF algorithm in GEE achieved the highest performance with an overall accuracy of 98.43% and Kappa coefficient of 0.9773 in 2023, demonstrating strong stability across all years. SVM, while slightly less consistent, achieved 97.6% user accuracy and 98.8% producer accuracy for the water class in 2023, outperforming RF in that category. ENVI-based SVM models attained an overall accuracy of 91.96% and Kappa coefficient of 0.8862, performing well for vegetation but showing slightly lower robustness than RF in GEE. In conclusion, the integration of cloud-based (GEE) and desktop (ENVI) remote sensing platforms with machine learning algorithms proved highly effective for large-scale urban monitoring. The findings highlight rapid urban expansion and vegetation loss in Kathmandu and offer valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and environmental management.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Multi-Temporal Land Cover Analysis of Kathmandu Using Google Earth Engine and ENVI: A Comparative Study of SVM and RF Algorithms
    
    AU  - Bhuwan Singh Bisht
    AU  - Nabaraj Subedi
    AU  - Gaurav Bisht
    AU  - Amit Yadav
    Y1  - 2025/10/28
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12
    T2  - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
    SP  - 167
    EP  - 182
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-7993
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20250904.12
    AB  - Rapid urbanization and land cover change have emerged as major environmental concerns in developing regions, particularly within the Kathmandu District of Nepal. This study aims to analyze multi-temporal land cover changes and compare the performance of two machine learning algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF)—across two platforms: Google Earth Engine (GEE) and ENVI. Sentinel-2 satellite imagery from 2017, 2020, and 2023 was utilized to classify four major land cover classes (water, bareland, built-up, and vegetation) using supervised classification techniques. Preprocessing included cloud masking, filtering, and subsetting, while training samples were generated from high-resolution Google Earth Pro and Copernicus Sentinel imagery. Accuracy was assessed using user’s accuracy, producer’s accuracy, overall accuracy, and the Kappa coefficient derived from confusion matrices. Results indicate a steady increase in built-up areas (from 24.75% in 2017 to 37.06% in 2023) and bareland, alongside a marked decline in vegetation. The RF algorithm in GEE achieved the highest performance with an overall accuracy of 98.43% and Kappa coefficient of 0.9773 in 2023, demonstrating strong stability across all years. SVM, while slightly less consistent, achieved 97.6% user accuracy and 98.8% producer accuracy for the water class in 2023, outperforming RF in that category. ENVI-based SVM models attained an overall accuracy of 91.96% and Kappa coefficient of 0.8862, performing well for vegetation but showing slightly lower robustness than RF in GEE. In conclusion, the integration of cloud-based (GEE) and desktop (ENVI) remote sensing platforms with machine learning algorithms proved highly effective for large-scale urban monitoring. The findings highlight rapid urban expansion and vegetation loss in Kathmandu and offer valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and environmental management.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections