Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.
| Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32 |
| Page(s) | 110-113 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Circumcision, Nursing Intervention, Mental Health
| [1] | Alanis MC, Lucidi RS. Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world’s oldest and most controversial operation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016; 59 (5): 379-395. |
| [2] | Morris BJ, Matthews JG, Krieger JN. Prevalence of phimosis in males of all ages: systematic review. Urology 2020; 135: 124-132. |
| [3] | Freeman JJ, Spencer AU, Drongowski RA, Vandeven CJ, Apgar B, Teitelbaum DH. Newborn circumcision outcomes: are parents satisfied with the results? Pediatr Surg Int 2017; 30 (3): 333e8. |
| [4] | Kim JK, Koyle MA, Chua ME, Ming JM, Lee MJ, Kesavan A, et al. Assessment of risk factors for surgical complications in neonatal circumcision clinic. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 13 (4): 108-12. |
| [5] | Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I. Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol 2016; 10: 2. |
| [6] | American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (3): 585e6. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1989. |
| [7] | Mmeje C, Marmar JL. A nerve sparing circumcision with minimal foreskin mucosa (NSCMFM). Fertil Steril. 2018; 90: 174-5. |
| [8] | Shenoy SP, Marla PK, Sharma P, Bhat N, Rao AR. Frenulum sparing circumcision: step-by-step approach of a novel technique. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9 (12): 1-3. |
| [9] | Danzig MR, Wild TT, Holbrook S, Wilcox DT. Distribution of a photographic atlas did not reduce postoperative care utilization after pediatric circumcision or the indispensability of the pediatric urology clinic nurse. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15 (3): 227e1e6. |
| [10] | Anwer AW, Samad L, Iftikhar S, Baig-Ansari N. Reported male circumcision practices in a Muslim-majority setting. Bio Med ResInt. 2017: 4957348. |
| [11] | Xia JD, Jiang HS, Zhu LL, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials. assess the efficacy of circumcision for premature ejaculation. Int J Impot Res 2016; 28: 127-132. |
| [12] | Somov P, Chan BKY, Wilde C, et al. Bleeding after circumcision is more likely in children with lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). J Pediatr Uro 2017; 13: 208.e1-208.e4. |
| [13] | Cox G, Krieger JN, Morris BJ. Histological correlates of penile sexual sensation: does circumcision Make a difference. Sex Med 2015; 3: 76-85. |
| [14] | Yan WL, Wang CC, Huang YD, Yimiti D, Wang Q, Upur H. Parental factors affecting the circumcision of non-Muslim Chinese boys include education and family history. Acta Paediatr. 2015; 104 (12): e569e76. |
| [15] | White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D. Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175: 452–454. |
| [16] | El-Rufaie O, Absood G. Validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 687–688. |
| [17] | Richter T, Meyer G, Mohler R, Kopke S. Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; (12): CD008634. |
| [18] | Cohen-Mansfield J, Jensen B, Resnick B, Norris M. Knowledge of and attitudes toward nonpharmacological interventions for treatment of behavior symptoms associated with dementia: a comparison of physicians, psychologists, and nurse practitioners. Gerontologist. 2017; 52: 34–45. |
| [19] | Ludwin BM, Meeks S. Nurses’ intentions to initiate an antipsychotic or behavioral intervention with nursing home residents: the role of norms and being evaluated. Clinical Gerontologist. 2018. |
APA Style
Guihong Chen. (2021). Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision. American Journal of Nursing Science, 10(1), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32
ACS Style
Guihong Chen. Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 10(1), 110-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32
AMA Style
Guihong Chen. Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision. Am J Nurs Sci. 2021;10(1):110-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32,
author = {Guihong Chen},
title = {Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision},
journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {110-113},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20211001.32},
abstract = {Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision AU - Guihong Chen Y1 - 2021/02/28 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 110 EP - 113 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.32 AB - Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: