Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effect of the Deposition Potential on Morphology, Nucleation, and Crystal Orientation of Nickel Electrodeposited

Received: 15 December 2023    Accepted: 27 December 2023    Published: 8 January 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The works reported in this paper deal with the effects of the electrodeposition potential on the morphology, the nucleation, and the crystallographic features of the nickel electrodeposited from a Watts-type bath. For this purpose, coatings electrodeposited at five different deposition potentials from –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl to –0.80 V/Ag/AgCl were investigated. The morphology of the coatings was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and the current transients were compared to the 2D and 3D theoretical models of nucleation and growth. Then, the diffractograms were plotted as a function of the deposition potential. The results showed that the coatings are uniform when deposited at –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl. The nucleation and growth of coatings all follow the instantaneous models in the potential window of study but switch from 2D to 3D at –0.65 V/Ag/AgCl. These different features of the coatings have been attributed to the hydrogen evolution reaction which represents up to 10 % of the total current at –0.80 V/Ag/AgCl. Besides, the calculation of the texture coefficient extracted from the X-ray diffraction data has indicated the plane (220) as the preferred crystal orientation. Also, the observation of the shifts of the peaks has demonstrated the presence of uniform stress in the electrocoatings deposited from –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl to –0.75V/Ag/AgCl. Above, tensile stress appears.

Published in American Journal of Physical Chemistry (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11
Page(s) 1-8
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Nickel Electrodeposition, Nucleation Model, XRD

References
[1] R. Djouani and X. Qian. Mechanism of electrodeposition of nickel in aqueous solution. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2022, 10(01), 64228–64239.
[2] K. R. Mamaghani and S. M. Naghib. The effect of stirring rate on electrodeposition of nanocrystalline nickel coatings and their corrosion behaviors and mechanical characteristics. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12(6), 023–5035. doi: 10.20964/2017.06.68.
[3] E. Gómez, R. Pollina, and E. Vallés. Nickel electrodeposition on different metallic substrates. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1995, 386, (1–2), 45.
[4] C. E. Dávalos, J. R. López, H. Ruiz, A. Méndez, R. A. López, and G. Trejo. Study of the Role of Boric Acid During the Electrochemical Deposition of Ni in a Sulfamate Bath. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 9785–9800.
[5] A. Bund and D. Thiemig. Influence of bath composition and pH on the electrocodeposition of alumina nanoparticles and nickel. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2007, 201(16–17), 7092–7099. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.010.
[6] W. A. Thompson and H. J. Saxton. Structure, strength, and fracture of electrodeposited nickel and Ni−Co alloys. Metall. Trans.1973, 4(6) 1599–1605.
[7] M. Moharana and A. Mallik. Nickel electrocrystallization in different electrolytes: An in-process and post synthesis analysis. Electrochim. Acta. 2013, 98, 1–10.
[8] O. P. Watts. Rapid Nickel Plating. Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc.1916, 29, 395.
[9] M. Monev, M. E. Baumgaertner, O. Leobich, and C. J. Raub. Innere Spannungen von kathodisch polarisierten Nickelschichten in schwefelsaueren Loesungen. Metalloberflaeche. 1991, 45, 77–85.
[10] E. L. Smith, A. P. Abbott, and K. S. Ryder. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (21), 11060–11082. doi: 10.1021/cr300162p.
[11] E. A. Mernissi Cherigui et al. Comprehensive Study of the Electrodeposition of Nickel Nanostructures from Deep Eutectic Solvents: Self-Limiting Growth by Electrolysis of Residual Water. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017, 121(17), 9337–9347. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01104.
[12] L. P. Bonfrisco and M. Frary. Effects of crystallographic orientation on the early stages of oxidation in nickel and chromium. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45(6), 1663–1671. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4144-x.
[13] Y. Wang, L. Shen, M. Qiu, Z. Tian, X. Liu, and W. Zhuo. Jet Electrodeposition of Ni-SiO2 Nanocomposite Coatings with Online Friction and Its Performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163(10) D579–D584. doi: 10.1149/2.0241610jes.
[14] L. N. Mendome. Surfaces nanostructurées de nickel électrodéposées sur divers substrats de dépôt: Etude de la croissance d’interface et des caractéristiques magnétiques. Université Reims Champagne, 2007.
[15] B. Scharifker and G. Hills. Theoretical and experimental studies of multiple nucleation. Electrochim. Acta. 1983, 28(7), 879–889.
[16] D. Grujicic and B. Pesic. Electrochemical and AFM study of nickel nucleation mechanisms on vitreous carbon from ammonium sulfate solutions. Electrochim. Acta. 2006, 51(13), 2678–2690. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.08.017.
[17] A. Ispas, H. Matsushima, A. Bund, and B. Bozzini. Nucleation and growth of thin nickel layers under the influence of a magnetic field. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 626(1–2), 174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.12.015.
[18] A. N. Correia, S. A. Machado, and L. A. Avaca. Direct observation of overlapping of growth centres in Ni and Co electrocrystallisation using atomic force microscopy. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 488(2), 110–116.
[19] M.-J. Deng, I.-W. Sun, P.-Y. Chen, J.-K. Chang, and W.-T. Tsai. Electrodeposition behavior of nickel in the water- and air-stable 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium-dicyanamide room-temperature ionic liquid. Electrochim. Acta. 2008, 53(19) 5812–5818. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.040.
[20] A. Milchev, Electrocrystallization, Fondamentals of Nucleation and Growth. Kluwer Acadamic Publishers, 2002.
[21] P. Scherrer, “Bestimmung der Grösse und der inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels Röntgenstrahlen. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen. 1918, 26. 98–100.
[22] R. T. C. Choo, J. M. Toguri, A. M. El-Sherik, and U. Erb. Mass transfer and electrocrystallization analyses of nanocrystalline nickel production by pulse plating. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1995, 25, 384–403.
[23] E. Rudnik, L. Burzyńska, and M. Gut. The effect of Cs+ ions on codeposition of SiC particles with nickel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 26(3), 575. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.025.
[24] A. Azizi, A. Sahari, G. Schmerber, and A. Dinia. Nucleation and structural properties of nickel films electrodeposited from chloride and sulfate baths. Int. J. Nanosci.2008, 7(6) 345–352.
[25] E. Gòmez, R. Pollina, and E. Vallès. Nickel electrodeposition on different metallic substrates. J. Electroanal. Chem.1995, 386, 45–56.
[26] E. Gómez, R. Pollina, and E. Vallés. Morphology and structure of nickel nuclei as a function of the conditions of electrodeposition. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1995, 397(1–2) 111.
[27] C. Zanella, M. Lekka, and P. L. Bonora. Influence of the particle size on the mechanical and electrochemical behaviour of micro- and nano-nickel matrix composite coatings. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2008, 39(1), 31–38. doi: 10.1007/s10800-008-9635-y.
[28] K. Ngamchuea, S. Eloul, K. Tschulik, and R. G. Compton. Planar diffusion to macro disc electrodes — what electrode size is required for the Cottrell and Randles-Sevcik equations to apply quantitatively? 2014, 18, 3251–3257. doi: 10.1007/s10008-014-2664-z.
[29] A. Bewick, M. Fleischmann, and H. R. Thirsk. Kinetics of the electrocrystallization of thin films of calomel. Trans. Faraday Soc.1962, 58, 2200. doi: 10.1039/tf9625802200.
[30] Y. Wang, C. Weng, H. Sun, and B. Jiang. Tribological properties and corrosion resistance of nickel-based composite mold inserts containing lubricant nanoparticles for micro-injection molding. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 5280–5293. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.241.
[31] J. Amblard, M. Froment, and G. Maurin. Etude radiocristallographique de l’orientation préférentielle des dépôts électrolytiques de nickel. Electrodepos. Surf. Treat.1974, 2, 205–222.
[32] N. S. Qu, D. Zhu, K. C. Chan, and W. N. Lei. Pulse electrodeposition of nanocrystalline nickel using ultra narrow pulse width and high peak current density. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2003, 168(2–3), 123–128.
[33] C. B. Nielsen, A. Horsewell, and M. J. L. Østergàrd. On texture formation of nickel electrodeposits. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1997, 27(7), 839–845.
[34] A. Pandey, S. Dalal, S. Dutta, and A. Dixit. Structural characterization of polycrystalline thin films by X-ray diffraction techniques. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2021, 32, 1341–1368, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-04998-w.
[35] A. A. Chernov. Theoretical and Technological Aspects of Crystal Growth,” in In: Materials Science Forum, Rimini, Italy, 1998, 71–78.
[36] L. Vitos, A. V Ruban, H. L. Skriver, and J. Kolla. The surface energy of metals. Surf. Sci. 1998, 411, 186–202.
[37] L. Nzoghe-Mendome, A. Aloufy, J. Ebothé, D. Hui, and M. El Messiry. Surface roughening and transport properties in the growth of nano-structured nickel electrodeposits on ITO substrate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 115(2–3), 551–556. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.12.014.
[38] J. Amblard, M. Froment, and N. Spyrellis. Origine des textures dans les depots electrolytiques de nickel. Surf. Technol. 1977, 5 (3), 205–234.
[39] E. A. Pavlatou, M. Stroumbouli, P. Gyftou, and N. Spyrellis. Hardening effect induced by incorporation of SiC particles in nickel electrodeposits. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2006, 36(4), 385–394.
[40] T. Namazu and S. Inoue. Characterization of single crystal silicon and electroplated nickel films by uniaxial tensile test with in situ X-ray diffraction measurement. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2007, 30(1), 13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01043.x.
[41] A. Khorsand Zak, W. H. Abd. Majid, M. E. Abrishami, and R. Yousefi. X-ray analysis of ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson-Hall and size-strain plot methods. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13, 251–256. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.11.024.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abro, K. D. M., Sanou, A., Kwa-Koff, E. K. I. (2024). Effect of the Deposition Potential on Morphology, Nucleation, and Crystal Orientation of Nickel Electrodeposited. American Journal of Physical Chemistry, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abro, K. D. M.; Sanou, A.; Kwa-Koff, E. K. I. Effect of the Deposition Potential on Morphology, Nucleation, and Crystal Orientation of Nickel Electrodeposited. Am. J. Phys. Chem. 2024, 13(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abro KDM, Sanou A, Kwa-Koff EKI. Effect of the Deposition Potential on Morphology, Nucleation, and Crystal Orientation of Nickel Electrodeposited. Am J Phys Chem. 2024;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11,
      author = {Koutouan Desire Martial Abro and Ali Sanou and Edith Kouassi i Kwa-Koff},
      title = {Effect of the Deposition Potential on Morphology, Nucleation, and Crystal Orientation of Nickel Electrodeposited},
      journal = {American Journal of Physical Chemistry},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-8},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpc.20241301.11},
      abstract = {The works reported in this paper deal with the effects of the electrodeposition potential on the morphology, the nucleation, and the crystallographic features of the nickel electrodeposited from a Watts-type bath. For this purpose, coatings electrodeposited at five different deposition potentials from –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl to –0.80 V/Ag/AgCl were investigated. The morphology of the coatings was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and the current transients were compared to the 2D and 3D theoretical models of nucleation and growth. Then, the diffractograms were plotted as a function of the deposition potential. The results showed that the coatings are uniform when deposited at –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl. The nucleation and growth of coatings all follow the instantaneous models in the potential window of study but switch from 2D to 3D at –0.65 V/Ag/AgCl. These different features of the coatings have been attributed to the hydrogen evolution reaction which represents up to 10 % of the total current at –0.80 V/Ag/AgCl. Besides, the calculation of the texture coefficient extracted from the X-ray diffraction data has indicated the plane (220) as the preferred crystal orientation. Also, the observation of the shifts of the peaks has demonstrated the presence of uniform stress in the electrocoatings deposited from –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl to –0.75V/Ag/AgCl. Above, tensile stress appears.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of the Deposition Potential on Morphology, Nucleation, and Crystal Orientation of Nickel Electrodeposited
    AU  - Koutouan Desire Martial Abro
    AU  - Ali Sanou
    AU  - Edith Kouassi i Kwa-Koff
    Y1  - 2024/01/08
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11
    T2  - American Journal of Physical Chemistry
    JF  - American Journal of Physical Chemistry
    JO  - American Journal of Physical Chemistry
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 8
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-2449
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20241301.11
    AB  - The works reported in this paper deal with the effects of the electrodeposition potential on the morphology, the nucleation, and the crystallographic features of the nickel electrodeposited from a Watts-type bath. For this purpose, coatings electrodeposited at five different deposition potentials from –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl to –0.80 V/Ag/AgCl were investigated. The morphology of the coatings was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and the current transients were compared to the 2D and 3D theoretical models of nucleation and growth. Then, the diffractograms were plotted as a function of the deposition potential. The results showed that the coatings are uniform when deposited at –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl. The nucleation and growth of coatings all follow the instantaneous models in the potential window of study but switch from 2D to 3D at –0.65 V/Ag/AgCl. These different features of the coatings have been attributed to the hydrogen evolution reaction which represents up to 10 % of the total current at –0.80 V/Ag/AgCl. Besides, the calculation of the texture coefficient extracted from the X-ray diffraction data has indicated the plane (220) as the preferred crystal orientation. Also, the observation of the shifts of the peaks has demonstrated the presence of uniform stress in the electrocoatings deposited from –0.60 V/Ag/AgCl to –0.75V/Ag/AgCl. Above, tensile stress appears.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Industrial Processes, Synthesis, Environment and New Energies Laboratory (LAPISEEN), Felix Houphouët-Boigny National Polytechnic Institute (INP-HB), Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire

  • Industrial Processes, Synthesis, Environment and New Energies Laboratory (LAPISEEN), Felix Houphouët-Boigny National Polytechnic Institute (INP-HB), Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire

  • Physical Chemistry Laboratory (LCP), Félix Houphouët-Boigny University, (UFHB), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

  • Sections