Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of the Quality of Petrol and Natural Gas Fuels

Received: 12 December 2025     Accepted: 31 December 2025     Published: 11 July 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Natural gas and gasoline are essential energy sources for transportation and industries worldwide, and their quality is crucial. This study examines a variety of gasoline and natural gas samples to determine which is better based on important factors such sulfur content, firmness, surface tautness, viscidity, and fattening value. Eight different fuel suppliers provided samples, which were tested in violation of established standards such as ISO 8217: 2017 and GSA 141: 2022. Two suppliers' gasoline samples showed densities that were marginally below the allowed limits, indicating possible adulteration with lower-density materials like kerosene. With the exception of one sample, which also displayed increased sulfur levels, surface tension values for almost all samples remained within permissible norms. Viscosity measurements for fuels from three sources were marginally above suggested standards, perhaps leading to improved pollutant emissions, even though all fuels satisfied the minimum calorific value requirements. Only three providers' goods met the maximum allowable limit of 50 ppm in terms of sulfur concentration, meaning that more than 60% of the examined fuel samples had sulfur levels beyond the allowed threshold. These repercussions highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and more stringent quality control throughout the gasoline supply chain in order to guarantee fuel integrity and environmental compliance.

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics (Volume 15, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12
Page(s) 133-140
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Fuel Quality, Petrol Quality, Natural Gas Quality, Petrol and Natural Gas, Fuel Evaluation

1. Introduction
Petroleum and natural vapor are major sources of energy for modern societies. High fuel quality must be maintained to achieve the best engine performance, fuel economy, and environmental compliance because of their extensive use in the transportation, power generating, and trade sectors . Fuel quality integrity is becoming more and more important as the world's economy and people develop. Petrol and natural gas fuels are generally defined by a number of important factors, including density, viscosity, calorific value, sulfur content, and other chemical and physical characteristics. These structures affect not just ignition adeptness but also the release of toxic substances like sulfur oxides (SOx), particulates, and other dangerous substances. Energy impurities raise concerns about fuel quality and public health since they play a major role in air pollution, acid rain, and respiratory health problems . Additionally, engine wear, ignition stability, and fuel injection can all be impacted by fuel density and viscosity. Inappropriate viscosity may result in poor atomization or damage to gasoline pumps, while a low calorific value decreases energy output, which affects fuel efficiency. Fuel adulteration that takes place during refining, shipping, or storage makes maintaining gasoline standards much more difficult. Guidelines for gasoline quality are specified in national protocols and international standards like ISO, but enforcement and consistent monitoring are essential to guaranteeing that fuels on the market fulfill these requirements. The evaluation of fuel quality helps to detect deviations that could compromise machine reliability, environmental sustainability, and economic efficiency. This study focuses on a comprehensive taxation of petrol and natural gas fuel samples, investigating their corporal and chemical properties against established standards. By doing so, it aims to identify potential quality issues, raise awareness about fuel adulteration hazards, and support policy measures for better fuel management. Ultimately, preserving high-quality fuels is vital for reducing environmental pollution, enhancing engine performance, and safeguarding public health in an era of swelling energy feasting and environmental anxieties. Molea et al. investigated the fuel properties and engine performance of diesel–ethanol blends enhanced with tetrahydrofuran. Chevron Corporation this technical report provides a comprehensive overview of diesel fuel properties, specifications, and performance characteristics . Kwao-Boateng et al. evaluated diesel fuel quality by examining its physicochemical properties and their influence on combustion performance and pollutant emissions.
Petrol and Natural Gas Fuel Adulteration
Fuel adulteration refers to the illegitimate practice of collaborating inferior or unlawful substances with petrol or natural smoke to increase volume and diminish costs, which compromises coal quality. Common adulterants in petrol include kerosene, solvents, or lower-grade fuels, while natural gas may be contaminated with air, nitrogen, or other gases that reduce its calorific value. Chhetri and Watts measured the surface tension of petro-diesel and biodiesel fuels under high temperature and pressure conditions. Demirbas investigated the correlations between the physical properties of vegetable oils and biodiesel fuels.
Blended fuels negatively affect engine performance by causing incomplete combustion, which reduces power output, increases petroleum ingesting, and results in higher maintenance requirements. The presence of impurities and contaminants from adulteration accelerates engine wear and can damage sensitive components such as fuel injectors, valves, and catalytic converters. Petroleum adulteration contributes significantly to increased emissions of detrimental contaminants, counting carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, and particulate matter, which exacerbates air quality and health problems. Economic losses arise not only for consumers, who receive lower-quality fuels, but also for governments due to tax evasion and loss of revenue linked to illegal fuel practices . Detecting fuel adulteration requires regular testing and monitoring using chemical analysis and physical property measurements such as density, viscosity, and calorific value. Strengthening regulatory bases, improving supply chain transparency, and public awareness drives are essential strategies to war fuel adulteration effectively. Advances in fuel authentication machineries, such as tracer additives and isolated sensing, afford promising tools to recognize and avert debasement at several points in the delivery network. Ensuring the integrity of petrol and natural gas fuels safeguards engine longevity, reduces environmental pollution, protects consumer rights, and supports sustainable energy use.
2. Resources and Systems
2.1. Resources
This study utilized laboratory equipment from the Process Growth Laboratory within the Department of Chemical Engineering and the Fluid Belongings Laboratory of the Petroleum Engineering Department at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST). Analytical grade chemicals were procured from apparent suppliers counting Fisher Scientific and Sigma-Aldrich. Sulfur content analysis was conducted in collaboration with Tema Oil Refinery. Petrol and natural gas samples were collected in volumes of 3 liters from eight different fuel stations located throughout the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Boadu et al., investigated the effects of kerosene adulteration in diesel fuel and its implications for fuel quality and environmental safety in Ghana.
2.2. Methods
The investigation focused on evaluating and comparing key quality parameters such as thickness, viscidness, fattening value, superficial tautness, and sulfur gratified of the petrol and natural gas samples. Collection of fuel samples was performed using new, clean PET elastic containers with secure covers. Previous to specimen, the containers were rinsed twice with the respective fuel type to eliminate any residual contaminants. Samples were then stored at ambient laboratory conditions until testing. All experimental procedures adhered to the American Civilization for thought-provoking and Resources (ACCR) strategies, with discoveries benchmarked against canons established by the Ghana Standards Authority (GSA), specifically GS 141: 2022.
2.2.1. Density Measurement
Solidity fortitudes were carried out in accord with ASTM D4052-18a. The density, expressed in kilograms per cubic meter (kg/m3), was self-possessed at a controlled temperature of 15°C and distinctive pressure. Each sample volume of approximately 0.9 mL was introduced into the measurement chamber of a KRUSS DS 7800 thickness meter using a syringe to prevent bubble formation. The instrument automatically calculated and displayed the density values.
2.2.2. Viscosity Measurement
The kinematic viscosity of the firewood models was self-possessed using a Cannon-Fenske viscometer (Eduteq Educational Instruments) following ASTM D445-18 processes. As described by the equation, the kinematic viscidness (ν) was calculated by multiplying the flow time (t), after subtracting the Hagenbach correction factor (ϑ), by the viscometer’s calibration constant (C).
ν = C (t − ϑ)
where:
1) ν = kinematic viscosity (cSt)
2) C = Standardization constant (cSt/s)
3) t = measured flow time (s)
4) ϑ = Hagenbach alteration aspect, functional when t < 400 seconds; set to zero for t > 400 seconds.
2.2.3. Sulfur Content Analysis
Sulfur concentrations in coal samples were examined using an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer model SLFA-60, following ASTM D4294-16e1 guidelines. Samples (4–10 mL) were placed into nonrefundable cups lined with polyethylene film to foil leakage and guard the instrument. The investigation was fully computerized, and the mean sulfur gratified was generated and chronicled for each sample.
2.2.4. Superficial Tautness Dimension
Table 1. Specifications and Testing Procedures for Petrol and Natural Gas Fuel Oils.

Property

Acceptable Range (GS 141: 2022)

Acceptable Range (ISO 8217: 2017)

Testing Standard

Thickness at 15°C (kg/m3)

820 – 850

820 – 900

ASTM D4052

Viscidness at 40°C (mm2/s)

2.0 – 4.5

2.0 – 4.5

ASTM D445

Sulfur Gratified (ppm)

Maximum 50

Maximum 50

ASTM D5453

Fattening Value (MJ/kg)

Not quantified

Minimum 42.7

ASTM D4868

According to ASTM D1331-14 , based on the principles the surface tension was measured using a Du Noüy ring densitometer (Sigma 700/701 Force Densitometer). In this measurement, a platinum ring is submerged slightly below the liquid surface, and the meniscus is gradually pulled upward while the force is progressively reduced. Burns et al. presented recent advances in acid rain research and highlights its continuing environmental impacts The force exerted on the ring was recorded to calculate the surface tension values
2.2.5. Fattening Value
The calorific value of each fuel sample was measured following the ASTM D5865-13 standard using a PARR 6400 bomb calorimeter. In this method, the fuel sample is placed inside the combustion chamber, which is then filled with oxygen and submerged in a water jacket within an insulated container. Upon ignition, the heat released causes a rise in the water temperature, recorded as ΔT by a submerged thermometer. The calorific value (q) was totaled using the equation q = C × ΔT, where C epitomizes the calorimeter’s warmth capacity. All measured fuel parameters were benchmarked against the Ghana Standards Authority (GSA) GS 141: 2022 and ISO 8217: 2017 standards (see Table 1) to evaluate the compliance and overall quality of the petrol and natural gas fuels. Manisalidis et al. examined the environmental and health effects caused by air pollution. Matijošius & Sokolovskij studied and analyzed the impact of bio-components on diesel fuel quality and performance. Mohankumar & Senthilkumar discussed the formation mechanisms of particulate matter in diesel engines and mitigation strategies.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Thickness
Density is a critical parameter influencing fuel performance in internal combustion engines, as it affects the volume of fuel injected and combusted. Figure 1 illustrates the mean density values obtained for the tested fuels. Most samples complied with the acceptable density range specified by GS 141: 2022 and ISO 8217: 2017. However, samples from suppliers MC-A and MC-G exhibited faintly reduced density values. Given the deregulated nature of Ghana’s fuel market, various oil marketing companies procure fuels from multiple sources, provided the fuels meet prescribed standards. Lower-than-standard density is often a sign of adulteration, frequently due to mixing diesel with lighter hydrocarbons like kerosene, which shares similar physical traits but is less expensive. Historical price differences between diesel and kerosene previously created incentives for such adulteration. While regulatory efforts have minimized these discrepancies, contamination through other hydrocarbons or accidental mixing during transport and storage remains possible. Research by demonstrates a direct correlation between diesel density and emissions, revealing that higher density fuels tend to produce elevated nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate substance (PM) discharges. Chevron Corporation presented a comprehensive overview of diesel fuel properties, specifications, and performance characteristics. Ubeidalah evaluated the gasoline quality in the Accra metropolis based on chemical and performance parameters. Kwao-Boateng et al. assessed the diesel fuel quality using physicochemical and regulatory compliance indicators .
3.2. Viscidness
The average viscosity levels of fuel samples are shown in Figure 2 in comparison to GSA GS141: 2022 and ISO 8217: 2017 ethics. A Few models showed viscosities that were marginally above the limits, but the majority were within the permissible range. Elevated viscosity can impair apparatus functionality by affecting fuel atomization during injection. According to higher gumminess causes petroleum globule latitude to increase, which has a deter mental effect on the quality of the air fuel mixture and leads to inefficient combustion, better pollutant discharges, and improved coal consumption. According to additional research published in the Fuel journal, high-viscosity diesel fuels are associated with lower engine power, increased fuel consumption, and increased NOx and PM emissions because of partial combustion from lower certain numbers. On the other hand, fuels with lower viscosity may improve ignition efficiency and reduce NOx and particulate emissions, but they may also increase coal seepage and evaporative rate.
Figure 1. A graph of the Density of Petrol and Natural Gas fuels collected at different locations in Kumasi.
Figure 2. A graph of the viscosity of Petrol and Natural Gas fuels collected at different locations in Kumasi, Ghana.
3.3. Surface Tension
Outward tension discusses to the intermolecular services present at the edge of a fluid, particularly at its outward. In the context of fuels such as gas and natural gas byproducts, outward tension ominously influences ignition behavior by heartrending atomization and posy patterns. Proper atomization smoothed by prime surface stringency enhances the mingling of fuel with air, which in turn can improve combustion efficiency, reduce harmful emanations, and boost overall engine performance. In this study, as illustrated in Figure 3, all fuel samples unproven surface tension values within tolerable ranges, except for sample MC-C, which unveiled a slightly worse value. This reflection aligns with findings from Molea et al. , who noted that higher sulfur content in fuel tends to flag covalent bonds, resulting in contracted outer tension. Consistently, MC-C, with the lowest measured surface tension, corresponded to the highest sulfur concentration. Although outward tension is not overtly regulated by gas standards, it remainders a perilous factor influencing fuel performance and secretions. For reference, diesel fuels typically display surface tension values between 25.84 and 28.89 mN/m at 25°C. Stanislaus et al. reviewed the technological advancements in the production of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel underscoring its relevance even if it is not among the primary diesel fuel provisions. Chhetri & Watts examined the surface tension behavior of diesel and biodiesel fuels under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions.
Figure 3. A graph presenting the surface tension measurements of petrol fuel samples sourced from various marketing companies in Kumasi, Ghana, as part of the evaluation of petrol and natural gas fuel quality.
3.4. Calorific Value
As shown in Figure 4, the average calorific values of fuel samples obtained from various filling stations complied with the ISO 8217: 2017 standard. The calorific value represents the energy content of a fuel and is influenced by its chemical composition. Fuels with a higher proportion of heavier hydrocarbons typically exhibit higher calorific values. For consumers, a higher calorific value implies more energy per unit volume, translating to longer-lasting fuel and reduced consumption rates. The calorific value is therefore a key quality indicator—so long as it remains above the minimum acceptable threshold, the fuel is considered suitable for market use. Gokhale & Khare discussed the computational models used to predict and analyze vehicle exhaust emissions. Kelly & Fussell presented the emerging public health challenges associated with air pollution exposure.
Figure 4. A graph showing the calorific values of petrol fuel samples obtained from different sites across Kumasi, Ghana, as part of the evaluation of fuel energy content and overall quality of petrol and natural gas fuels.
3.5. Sulphur Content
The amount of sulfur in diesel coals is a significant factor since burning sulfur has detrimental impacts on the environment and human health. Over the years, there has been considerable worry about the quantity of sulphur in diesel, which has prompted international efforts to reduce fuel levels through stringent restrictions. Figure 5 displays the typical sulfur concentration of diesel samples from the important locations our study examined. An review of Figure 5 shows that just three of the eight satisfactory locations that underwent testing were able to distribute diesel with sulphur levels that met the GSA GS 141: 2022 and ISO 8217: 2017 requirements, which set a maximum of 50 parts per million (ppm). based on a review of Figure 5. These conforming samples had sulfur contents between 20 and 30 parts per million. However, this restriction was exceeded by the other five stations, with the highest sulfur levels being recorded by MC-E, MC-F, and MC-G. Notably, the Nationwide Fuel Authority (NFA) has issued a temporary exception. The elevated Sulphur levels detected in some samples may be attributed to blending practices during stowage and dispersal or the procurement of fuel from native factories operating under this waiver. Additionally, the possibility exists that some fuels entering the market illegally are unregulated and adulterated, as evidenced by reports of smuggling across borders involving compromised fuel quality. Stanislaus et al. proposed the technological advancements in the production of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel. Tan & Wang examined how sulfur and ash content in lubricating oils influence diesel particulate matter structure. In this study, compliance with sulphur content standards was only 37.5%, demonstrating that most diesel trials surpassed the prescribed limits. This situation is troubling due to the harmful effects sulphur emissions have on both environmental quality and public health. Upon combustion, sulphur compounds convert to sulphur oxides (SOx), such as sulfur dioxide (SO2), which adversely affect air quality and pose health risks to residents in the studied region. The urgency of addressing these health and environmental hazards is shown by the poor compliance rate. Furthermore, vehicles powered by high-sulfur diesel significantly worsen air pollution and the associated health problems. Due to Ghana's regular power outages, many houses and businesses increasingly rely on generators, which, if they run on high-sulfur diesel, can exacerbate air pollution near residential areas. Acid rain, which harms flora, deteriorates soil, and acidifies aquatic environments, is a result of these emissions. Sulfur accelerates corrosion and can interfere with the operation of complex emission control systems in cars. In addition to using high-sulfur fuels from local refineries, adulteration can also significantly increase the sulfur concentration. This kind of adulteration may be carried out by oil marketing corporations (OMCs) or their agents at various stages. Demirbas established the correlations between the physical properties of vegetable oils and biodiesel fuels. Monroe presented the fundamental physical and chemical properties of diesel fuel. Norman provided the foundational knowledge on diesel technology, including fuel systems and engine operation.
Figure 5. A chart illustrating the sulfur concentration levels in petrol fuel samples collected from multiple locations throughout Kumasi, Ghana, as part of the overall assessment of petrol and natural gas fuel quality.
Conclusion and Suggestion
According to the results of this revision, most gasoline trials regularly mollify the quality requirements delineated in the two aforesaid specifications. Six of the eight substantial locations had fuel densities within the legalized limit, while two of the stations had slightly lower concentrations, perchance as a result of contamination with sunlit materials. This corresponds to a 75% density acquiescence rate. High viscosity fuels, which can impair engine performance and increase emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), were supplied at three filling stations. Only 62.5% of the fuels were able to meet the required viscosity as a result. All of the fuel trials' calorific levels matched trade customs. Given its significant detrimental special effects on the atmosphere and social health, sulfur deliberation is undoubtedly an important contemplation. In this inquiry region, adherence to sulfur contented borders was notably low (37.5%), as just three locations supplied diesel with sulfur points at or below 50 ppm. Even though there are no recognized conventions limiting surface tension for diesel, it is an incidental indicator of pollution, particularly sulfur. These discoveries were maintained by the study's confirmation of an inverse link between surface tension and sulfur content Different fuel sources and the leeway of contamination all through distribution and packing can lead to variations in fuel qualities. To improve gasoline quality management, it is recommended that the National Petroleum Authority (NPA) implement a robust and nonstop fuel quality intensive care system at retail outlets and throughout the whole supply chain. Strengthening control at entrance themes like ports and throughout the spreading network will increase agreement with coal protocols. By taking such steps, Ghana will be one step closer to achieving the Bearable Development Goals for renewable vitality (BDG 7) and climate action Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 13).
Acknowledgments
I extend my sincere gratitude to everyone who generously supported this research. Special thanks go to the administration of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Engineering Education Project (KEEP) and the leadership of West Coast Gas Ghana (WCGG). I am especially grateful to all those who contributed to the successful completion of this study, which focused on assessing the quality of petroleum and natural gas fuels. Special thanks go to my mentors and colleagues for their valuable guidance and support throughout the research process. I also appreciate the cooperation of the fuel stations and industry experts who provided access to samples and critical data essential for this work. Finally, I acknowledge the encouragement from my family and friends, whose support motivated me during the entire study.
Author Contributions
Anandhi P: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft
Srividya M: Formal Analysis, Project administration, Resources
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this study has not been deposited in any publicly accessible repository. However, all relevant data necessary to replicate the findings of this research are provided in detail within this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the results or interpretations presented in this study.
References
[1] Boadu, K. O. (2019). Impact of diesel fuel adulteration with kerosene in Ghana. Journal of AppliedSciencesandEnvironmentalManagement, 23(7), 1195.
[2] Burns, D. A., Aherne, J., Gay, D. A., & Lehmann, C. M. B. (2016). Recent progress in acid rain research and its impact on the environment. Atmospheric Environment, 146, 1–4.
[3] Chevron Corporation. (2007). Technical Review of Diesel Fuels. Available at
[4] Chhetri, A. B., & Watts, K. C. (2013). Measurement of surface tension in petro-diesel and various biodiesel fuels under high temperature and pressure conditions. Fuel, 104, 704–710.
[5] Demirbas, A. (2008). Correlations between physical properties of vegetable oils and biodiesel fuels. 87(8–9), 1743–1748.
[6] Gad, S. C. (2014). Overview of Diesel Fuel. In P. Wexler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Toxicology (3rd ed., pp. 115–118). Academic Press.
[7] Gokhale, S., & Khare, M. (2004). A review of computational approaches to model vehicle exhaust emissions. International Journal of Transport Management, 2, 59–74.
[8] Kelly, F. J., & Fussell, J. C. (2015). New and emerging public health challenges from air pollution. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 37, 631–649.
[9] Lois, E., Keating, E. L., & Gupta, A. K. (2003). Fuels section. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (pp. 275–314). Elsevier.
[10] Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). A comprehensive review of the environmental and health effects caused by air pollution. Frontiersin Public Health.
[11] Matijošius, J., & Sokolovskij, E. (2009). Study on how bio components affect fuel quality. Transport, 24(3), 212–217.
[12] Mohankumar, S., & Senthilkumar, P. (2017). Detailed review on formation and mitigation of particulate matter in diesel engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1227–1238.
[13] Molea, A., Visuian, P., Barabas, I., Suciu, R. C., & Burnete, N. V. (2017). Investigating key fuel properties and engine behavior of diesel-ethanol blends enhanced with tetrahydrofuran. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 252, 012077.
[14] Monroe, D. (2016). Properties of diesel fuel. Presented at the MDEC Conference, Toronto, Ontario.
[15] Norman. A. (2016). Diesel Technology. Retrieved from Perera, F. (2017). Pollution from burning fossil fuels poses a major environmental threat to children's health and social equity: Solutions and strategies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), Article 16.
[16] Stanislaus, A., Marafi, A., & Rana, M. S. (2010). Technological advancements in ultra-low sulfurdieselproduction. CatalysisToday, 153(1), 168.
[17] Tan, P. Q., & Wang, D. Y. (2018). Influence of sulfur and ash content in lubricating oils on the morphology and nanostructure of diesel particulate matter. Energy & Fuels, 32(1), 713724.
[18] Ubeidalah, S. K. (2015). Evaluation of gasoline quality in the Accra metropolis (Unpublished master’s thesis). Department of Chemistry, University of Ghana.
[19] Kwao-Boateng, E., Ankudey, E. G., Darkwah, L., & Danquah, K. O. (2024). Assessment of diesel fuel quality. Heliyon.
[20] E. Kwao-Boateng, E. G. Ankudey, L. Darkwah & K. O. Danquah, Assessment of diesel fuel quality, Fuel, Vol. 10(2024), Article e24733, Elsevier Ltd. Effects of fuel properties on combustion and pollutant emissions, Fuel, Volume 267(2020), Article 117123, Elsevier Ltd.
[21] ASTM International. (2014). Standard test methods for surface and interfacial tension of solutions of surface-active agents (ASTM D1331–14). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    P., A., M., S. (2026). Evaluation of the Quality of Petrol and Natural Gas Fuels. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 15(4), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    P., A.; M., S. Evaluation of the Quality of Petrol and Natural Gas Fuels. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2026, 15(4), 133-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    P. A, M. S. Evaluation of the Quality of Petrol and Natural Gas Fuels. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2026;15(4):133-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12,
      author = {Anandhi P. and Srividya M.},
      title = {Evaluation of the Quality of Petrol and Natural Gas Fuels},
      journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics},
      volume = {15},
      number = {4},
      pages = {133-140},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtas.20261504.12},
      abstract = {Natural gas and gasoline are essential energy sources for transportation and industries worldwide, and their quality is crucial. This study examines a variety of gasoline and natural gas samples to determine which is better based on important factors such sulfur content, firmness, surface tautness, viscidity, and fattening value. Eight different fuel suppliers provided samples, which were tested in violation of established standards such as ISO 8217: 2017 and GSA 141: 2022. Two suppliers' gasoline samples showed densities that were marginally below the allowed limits, indicating possible adulteration with lower-density materials like kerosene. With the exception of one sample, which also displayed increased sulfur levels, surface tension values for almost all samples remained within permissible norms. Viscosity measurements for fuels from three sources were marginally above suggested standards, perhaps leading to improved pollutant emissions, even though all fuels satisfied the minimum calorific value requirements. Only three providers' goods met the maximum allowable limit of 50 ppm in terms of sulfur concentration, meaning that more than 60% of the examined fuel samples had sulfur levels beyond the allowed threshold. These repercussions highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and more stringent quality control throughout the gasoline supply chain in order to guarantee fuel integrity and environmental compliance.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of the Quality of Petrol and Natural Gas Fuels
    AU  - Anandhi P.
    AU  - Srividya M.
    Y1  - 2026/07/11
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12
    T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    SP  - 133
    EP  - 140
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9006
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20261504.12
    AB  - Natural gas and gasoline are essential energy sources for transportation and industries worldwide, and their quality is crucial. This study examines a variety of gasoline and natural gas samples to determine which is better based on important factors such sulfur content, firmness, surface tautness, viscidity, and fattening value. Eight different fuel suppliers provided samples, which were tested in violation of established standards such as ISO 8217: 2017 and GSA 141: 2022. Two suppliers' gasoline samples showed densities that were marginally below the allowed limits, indicating possible adulteration with lower-density materials like kerosene. With the exception of one sample, which also displayed increased sulfur levels, surface tension values for almost all samples remained within permissible norms. Viscosity measurements for fuels from three sources were marginally above suggested standards, perhaps leading to improved pollutant emissions, even though all fuels satisfied the minimum calorific value requirements. Only three providers' goods met the maximum allowable limit of 50 ppm in terms of sulfur concentration, meaning that more than 60% of the examined fuel samples had sulfur levels beyond the allowed threshold. These repercussions highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and more stringent quality control throughout the gasoline supply chain in order to guarantee fuel integrity and environmental compliance.
    VL  - 15
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Mathematics, Sona College of Arts and Science, Salem, India

  • Department of Mathematics, Sona College of Arts and Science, Salem, India