1. Introduction
Air pollution is one of the varieties of manmade environmental disasters currently taking place worldwide
[1] | Krzyzanowski, M., Apte, J. S., Bonjour, S. P., Brauer, M., Cohen, A. J., Prüss-Ustun, A. M. (2014). Air Pollution in the Mega-cities. Curr. Envir Health Rpt |
[1]
. Air pollution may be an atmospheric condition in which various substances are present at concentrations high enough above their normal ambient levels to produce a measurable effect on people, animals, vegetation, or materials. ‘Substances’ refers to any natural or manmade chemical elements or compounds capable of being airborne
[2] | Harrison, R. M., Pope, F. D. and Shi, Z. (2014) Air pollution, Earth Systems, and Environmental Sciences, pp. 1-17. |
[2]
. These may exist in the atmosphere as gases, liquid drops, or solid particles. It includes any substance whether noxious or benign; however, the term ‘measurable effect’ generally restricts attention to those substances that cause undesirable effects. Air Quality has deteriorated both due to human activities and natural phenomena such as windblown dust particles etc
[3] | Razib, Nayeem, A. A., Hossain, M. S. and Majumder, A. K. (2020). PM2.5 concentration and meteorological characteristics in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 55(2): 89-98. |
[4] | Hossen, M. A. and Hoque, A. (2018). Variation of Ambient Air Quality Scenario in Chittagong City: A Case Study of Air Pollution Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 3(1): 10-16. |
[3, 4]
. Growing cities
[5] | Begum, B. A., Biswas, S. K., Nasiruddin, M., Hossain, A. M. S. and Hopke, P. K. (2009). Source Identification of Chittagong Aerosol by Receptor Modeling. Environmental Engineering Science, 26(3): 679-689. |
[5]
, increasing traffic
[6] | Hossain, M. M., Majumder, A. K., Islam, M. and Nayeem, A. A. (2019). Study on Ambient Particulate Matter (PM2.5) with Different Mode of Transportation in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. American Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences, 1 (4): 12-19. |
[6]
, rapid economic development
[7] | Salam, A., Hossain, T., Siddique, M. N. A. and Alam, A. M. S. (2008). Characteristics of Atmospheric Trace Gases, Particulate Matter, and Heavy Metal Pollution in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Air Qual Atmos, 1: 101-109. |
[7]
, and higher levels of energy consumption
[8] | Ahammad, S. S., Siraj, S., Ali, M. S., Kaji, M. A. and Kazi, F. K. (2010). Tracking of Possible Sources of Dhaka City Air Pollutants. Proc. of International Conference on Environmental Aspects of Bangladesh (ICEAB10), 136-137, Japan. |
[8]
lead to air pollution very seriously. However, these are mainly concentrated in the cities. Recently, air pollution has received priority among environmental issues in Asia as well as in other parts of the world. Exposure to air pollution is the main environmental threat to human health in many towns and cities. Bangladesh is in the top position in the Air Quality Report of 2019 and 2020 in terms of air pollution, where Dhaka city is in the second position among the capital cities of the world
. Apart from this, the latest report released by IQAir states that in 2020 the average of PM
2.5 in the air of Bangladesh was found 77.1 µg/m
3. It is 5.5 times higher than the standard level which is 15 micrograms per cubic meter set by the Department of Environment (DoE). According to the Report, about 7 million people die every year in the world due to air pollution. In 2018, about 1 lakh 58 thousand people died of air pollution in Bangladesh
. For many decades, like Dhaka air pollutants have increased continuously in the different cities in Bangladesh. Cities surrounding Dhaka are also polluting day by day. Cities like Tangail, Narsingdi, Barisal, Chattogram, Gazipur; Narayanganj and Sylhet any other division are being polluted because of developing work
[3] | Razib, Nayeem, A. A., Hossain, M. S. and Majumder, A. K. (2020). PM2.5 concentration and meteorological characteristics in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 55(2): 89-98. |
[12] | Haque, H. A., Huda, N., Tanu, F. Z., Sultana, N., Hossain, M. S. A. and Rahman, M. H. (2017). Ambient Air Quality Scenario in and around Dhaka City of Bangladesh. Barisal University Journal Part 1, 4(1): 203-218. |
[13] | Rana, M. M., Sulaiman, N., Sivertsen, B., Khan, M. F. and Nasreen, S. (2016). Trends in Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and the Vicinity. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res. |
[3, 12, 13]
. Air pollution seriously affects the respiratory tract and can causes’ high respiratory disease, headache, asthma, high blood pressure, and even cancer
[14] | Ahmed, S., Shamima, Q., Eva, H., and Bhowmik, M. (2016). Effect of Air Pollution on FVC, FEV 1, and FEV 1 /FVC% of the Traffic Policemen in Dhaka city. J. Bangladesh Soc. Physiol., 11(2): 39-42. |
[15] | Alam, M. Z., Armin, E., Haque, M., Halsey, J., Kayesh, E., and Qayum, A. (2018). Air Pollutants and Their Possible Health Effects at Different Locations in Dhaka City. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Res., 9(4): 1-11. |
[16] | Woo, M. K., Young, E. S., Mostofa, M. G., Golam, M., Afroz, S., Hasan, M. O. S. I., Quamruzzaman, Q., Bellinger, D. C., Christiani, D. C. and Mazumdar, M. (2018). Lead in Air in Bangladesh: Exposure in a Rural Community with Elevated Blood Lead Concentrations among Young Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15: 1947. |
[14-16]
. One of the most difficult problems is irritation of the eyes or throat, coughing, sneezing; high fever
[15] | Alam, M. Z., Armin, E., Haque, M., Halsey, J., Kayesh, E., and Qayum, A. (2018). Air Pollutants and Their Possible Health Effects at Different Locations in Dhaka City. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Res., 9(4): 1-11. |
[15]
. The mental faculty of children will be adversely affected by PM pollution, which can also affect the central nervous system and cause renal damage and hypertension
[17] | Tusher, T. R., Ashraf, Z. and Akter, S. (2018). Health Effects of Brick Kiln Operations: A Study on Largest Brick Kiln Cluster in Bangladesh. South East Asia Journal of Public Health, 8(1): 32-36. |
[17]
.
Air pollution is one of the major problems in the Lalmonirhat District town area in the last few years due to a lot of ongoing development work. There are various sources of air pollution in Lalmonirhat city, among them, unfit vehicles and industries are notable, with the under-construction work done by the Lalmonirhat city Corporation. The number of mostly reconditioned vehicles is increasing every year. One-third of these vehicles do not have a fitness certificate. Due to the port facility, this city is attractive for investors to build an industry. Most industries do not follow environmental rules and regulations. Along with the air pollution, it is increasing in Lalmonirhat city due to the construction of various road repairs. Nowadays, the whole of Lalmonirhat has become a city of dust. For local transportation, rickshaws and autos (battery-operated) are the most commonly used vehicles. Since the area of the main city is not very large, buses are not required for public transportation. However, private cars are increasing significantly nowadays within the city area, which is contributing to air pollution. For connecting with other districts, the City has a Railway station (Junction) and several bus stops. To meet the rising population of the city, local people are building high-rise residential and commercial projects. In contrast, the city infrastructure, i., roads, parks, and open spaces, is the same as before. These development activities are directly or indirectly contributing to the air pollution of Lalmonirhat District town. For development work, construction masteries were carried out without any cover at that time; the air became polluted. Thus, over the past decade, the city has become a crowded place. Moreover, construction without following proper guidelines (for example, not covering the project site to prevent dust pollution) leads to harm to the environment, particularly the Air. These five pollutants have primary sources such as brickfields, cement industry, rock crusher, motor vehicles, and open burning and secondary sources such as road dust, airborne soil from agricultural fields, transboundary, etc.
[6] | Hossain, M. M., Majumder, A. K., Islam, M. and Nayeem, A. A. (2019). Study on Ambient Particulate Matter (PM2.5) with Different Mode of Transportation in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. American Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences, 1 (4): 12-19. |
[8] | Ahammad, S. S., Siraj, S., Ali, M. S., Kaji, M. A. and Kazi, F. K. (2010). Tracking of Possible Sources of Dhaka City Air Pollutants. Proc. of International Conference on Environmental Aspects of Bangladesh (ICEAB10), 136-137, Japan. |
[6, 8]
. Emissions from the brick kiln are the major contributors to air pollution in different cities; Dhaka especially in the dry seasons and PM
2.5 concentrations in mixed and motorized areas were on average higher than the non-motorized and vehicle-free areas
[6] | Hossain, M. M., Majumder, A. K., Islam, M. and Nayeem, A. A. (2019). Study on Ambient Particulate Matter (PM2.5) with Different Mode of Transportation in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. American Journal of Pure and Applied Biosciences, 1 (4): 12-19. |
[18] | Nayeem, A. A., Hossain, M. S., Majumder, A. K. and Carter, W. S. (2019). Spatiotemporal Variation of Brick Kilns and It’s Relation to Ground-Level PM2.5 Through MODIS Image at Dhaka District, Bangladesh. Int. J. of Environmental Pollution & Environmental Modelling, 2(5): 277-284. |
[6, 18]
. Particulate Matters originate from a variety of sources, such as power plants, industrial processes, transports, brick kilns, biomass burning, wind-blown dust, sea spray, and also, they are formed in the atmosphere by the transformation of gaseous emissions. Their chemical and physical compositions depend on the characteristics of the emission sources, location area, time of year, and prevailing weather conditions
[12] | Haque, H. A., Huda, N., Tanu, F. Z., Sultana, N., Hossain, M. S. A. and Rahman, M. H. (2017). Ambient Air Quality Scenario in and around Dhaka City of Bangladesh. Barisal University Journal Part 1, 4(1): 203-218. |
[19] | Begum, B. A., Biswas, S. K. and Nasiruddin, M. (2010). Trend and Spatial Distribution of Air Particulate Matter Pollution in Dhaka City. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, 34(1): 33-48. |
[12, 19]
. Particle conversions through chemical processes in the atmosphere by burning of biomass, gas, and fossil fuel is the main sources of the PM
2.5 [12] | Haque, H. A., Huda, N., Tanu, F. Z., Sultana, N., Hossain, M. S. A. and Rahman, M. H. (2017). Ambient Air Quality Scenario in and around Dhaka City of Bangladesh. Barisal University Journal Part 1, 4(1): 203-218. |
[12]
and while coarse particles (PM
2.5 -10) are the result of mechanical activities such as wind-blown dust, grindings, re-suspended road dust, etc
[13] | Rana, M. M., Sulaiman, N., Sivertsen, B., Khan, M. F. and Nasreen, S. (2016). Trends in Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and the Vicinity. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res. |
[13]
. In the urban area, CO is mostly emitted from anthropogenic emissions such as the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels and biomass burning
[20] | Salam, A., Hasan, M., Begum, B., Begum, M. and Biswas, S. (2013). Chemical Characterization of Biomass Burning Deposits from Cooking Stoves in Bangladesh. Biomass & Bioenergy, 52: 122-130. |
[21] | Begum, B. A., Biswas, S. K., Markwitz, A. and Hopke, P. K. (2018). Identification of Sources of Fine and Coarse Particulate Matter in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 10: 345-353. |
[20, 21]
.
Air Pollution has tremendous and various effects on the human body
[14] | Ahmed, S., Shamima, Q., Eva, H., and Bhowmik, M. (2016). Effect of Air Pollution on FVC, FEV 1, and FEV 1 /FVC% of the Traffic Policemen in Dhaka city. J. Bangladesh Soc. Physiol., 11(2): 39-42. |
[17] | Tusher, T. R., Ashraf, Z. and Akter, S. (2018). Health Effects of Brick Kiln Operations: A Study on Largest Brick Kiln Cluster in Bangladesh. South East Asia Journal of Public Health, 8(1): 32-36. |
[14, 17]
. Air pollution alone is responsible for one-third of the deaths from stroke, heart disease, and lung cancer
. Pollutants, especially PM
2.5, are considered more harmful due to their characteristics and it is capable of traveling deeper into the respiratory system and also passing through the alveoli into the bloodstream, which causes premature mortality, lung cancer, and increases the risk of respiratory and heart disease. Developing countries like Bangladesh suffer PM
2.5 exposures that are four to five times more than developed countries, and worldwide, air pollution is the fifth risk factor for mortality
[17] | Tusher, T. R., Ashraf, Z. and Akter, S. (2018). Health Effects of Brick Kiln Operations: A Study on Largest Brick Kiln Cluster in Bangladesh. South East Asia Journal of Public Health, 8(1): 32-36. |
[23] | World Health Organization Annual Report 2018. https://www.who.int/about/accountability/results/2018-2019 |
[17, 23]
. Exposure to CO can be detrimental to human health in that it binds to hemoglobin to form carboxy-hemoglobin, thus reducing the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood, it reduces the ability of organ tissues to extract oxygen from the hemoglobin, negatively affecting organs such as the brain, heart, and lungs
[24] | Salam, A., Assaduzzaman, M., Hossain, M. N. and Siddiki, N. A. (2015). Water Soluble Ionic Species in the Atmospheric Fine Particulate Matters (PM2.5) in a Southeast Asian Mega City (Dhaka, Bangladesh). Open Journal of Air Pollution, 4: 99-108. |
[25] | Tasnuva, A., reza, A., Islam, M. T. and Azad, A. K., (2014). Impact of Air Pollutant on Human Health in Kushtia Sugar Mill, Bangladesh. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences, 2(5): 184-191. |
[24, 25]
. Acute exposure to high concentrations of CO may result in CO poisoning with an onset of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, headaches, shortness of breath, confusion, and can quickly lead to death
[17] | Tusher, T. R., Ashraf, Z. and Akter, S. (2018). Health Effects of Brick Kiln Operations: A Study on Largest Brick Kiln Cluster in Bangladesh. South East Asia Journal of Public Health, 8(1): 32-36. |
[17]
. The effects of long-term exposure to elevated ambient concentrations of CO are often associated with cardiovascular problems amongst exposed individuals. PM
2.5 affect the respiratory, cardiovascular, nervous and renal system that cause persistent cough, asthma, nasal blockage, respiratory infections, hypertension, eye irritation, drowsiness, headaches and renal damage
[8] | Ahammad, S. S., Siraj, S., Ali, M. S., Kaji, M. A. and Kazi, F. K. (2010). Tracking of Possible Sources of Dhaka City Air Pollutants. Proc. of International Conference on Environmental Aspects of Bangladesh (ICEAB10), 136-137, Japan. |
[14] | Ahmed, S., Shamima, Q., Eva, H., and Bhowmik, M. (2016). Effect of Air Pollution on FVC, FEV 1, and FEV 1 /FVC% of the Traffic Policemen in Dhaka city. J. Bangladesh Soc. Physiol., 11(2): 39-42. |
[8, 14]
and eventually in increasing number of premature deaths
[20] | Salam, A., Hasan, M., Begum, B., Begum, M. and Biswas, S. (2013). Chemical Characterization of Biomass Burning Deposits from Cooking Stoves in Bangladesh. Biomass & Bioenergy, 52: 122-130. |
[20]
. Apart from this, air pollution is also responsible for some fatal diseases such as cancer and heart attack
[13] | Rana, M. M., Sulaiman, N., Sivertsen, B., Khan, M. F. and Nasreen, S. (2016). Trends in Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and the Vicinity. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res. |
[13]
.
3. Study Area and Methodology
3.1. Study Area
Lalmonirhat District town is an upazila of Lalmonirhat District in the Division of Rangpur, Bangladesh. Lalmonirhat District town is located at 25.9153°N 89.4500°E. It has 79,147 units of household and its total area is 259.54 km
2. The River Dharla, Tista, Swarnamati crosses the section of Lalmonirhat. According to the 2011 Bangladesh census, Lalmonirhat District town had a population of 333,166. Males constituted 51.4% of the population. Lalmonirhat Municipality is subdivided into nine wards and 64 mahallas. Lalmonirhat District town Upazila is divided into nine union parishads: Barobari, Gokunda, Harati, Khuniagachh, Kulaghat, Mogolhat, Mohendranagar, Panchagram, and Rajpur. The union parishads are subdivided into 117 mauzas and 173 villages
.
Figure 1. Study Area (Lalmonirhat District Town and Data Collection Locations Point).
3.2. Area Selection
32 locations were selected on the basis of the use of land. After that, all locations were divided according to the use of land into seven types, which are sensitive, residential, mixed, commercial, road intersection, industrial, and village Area
[27] | Majumder, A. K., Mahmud, K. K., Rahman, M., Patoary, M. N. A., Gautam, S., and Tanima, K. R. (2025). Spatial distribution and health implications of particulate matter concentrations across diverse land use types in Dinajpur District, Bangladesh. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 4(3), 100397, ISSN 2772-8838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100397 |
[27]
. There are a total of 5 sensitive areas that were selected, including hospitals and clinics, schools, colleges, mosques, madrasas, temples, churches, and administrative dhaban. On the other side, mixed areas contain bazars, buildings, main roads, etc. The remaining 27 locations were categorized as residential areas; 3 locations, mixed areas; 3 locations, commercial areas; 9 locations, road intersection or busiest road junctions and bends; 5 locations, industrial area; 4 locations, village area; 3 locations. The list of these 38 locations is shown in
Table 1.
Table 1. List of 32 Selected Areas of Lalmonirhat District Town Area.
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Sensitive Area | Felloship Church | 25.9112016 | 89.4338037 |
2. | BGB Lalmonirhat | 25.9114173 | 89.4280183 |
3. | Church of God Convention Center | 25.9119982 | 89.4350751 |
4. | Govt. Library | 25.9118463 | 89.4373011 |
5. | Land Office | 25.9134736 | 89.4357898 |
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Residential Area | Staf Quarter | 25.9122735 | 89.4423694 |
2. | Rahaman Monjil Complex | 25.9146541 | 89.438591 |
3. | East Harivanga | 25.9030958 | 89.4337804 |
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Mixed Area | Bashundhara Dhara Mosque | 25.9146826 | 89.4407373 |
2. | Gias Uddin High School | 25.9146377 | 89.4384048 |
3. | Taluk Kutamara | 25.9118099 | 89.4308433 |
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Commercial Area | Shena Moitry Hawakers Market | 25.9090931 | 89.434136 |
2. | Circuit House | 25.90709044 | 89.43392897 |
3. | Fakol Bus Stand | 25.9056394 | 89.43392639 |
4. | Railway Station | 25.9122997 | 89.4444797 |
5. | Mosque Market | 25.9159516 | 89.44350907 |
6. | BDR Bazar | 25.9160335 | 89.4441874 |
7. | Rajshahi Agriculture Development Bank | 25.9145358 | 89.4367994 |
8. | Occupation Bank | 25.9140506 | 89.4359922 |
9. | Appolo Dayagonestic Center | 25.9131115 | 89.4352696 |
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Road Intersection Area | TNT More | 25.9124799 | 89.4340799 |
2. | CP More | 25.9118932 | 89.4397034 |
3. | Alorupa More | 25.9147773 | 89.4421312 |
4. | Mission More Lalmonirhat | 25.9119544 | 89.4338259 |
5. | Main Road Lalmonirhat | 25.9117807 | 89.4292516 |
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Industrial Area | Store Bicic | 25.9031959 | 89.4091777 |
2. | Jaman Poltry Fids Product and Industry | 25.9019638 | 89.4089987 |
3. | West Bicic | 25.9026462 | 89.4079169 |
4. | Fatema Cuton Cutting Mill | 25.9037343 | 89.407952 |
S.N. | Location Type | Location Name | Latitude | Longitude |
1. | Village Area | Station Para | 25.9110576 | 89.4408799 |
2. | Harivanga | 25.9040594 | 89.4330466 |
3. | Balatari | 25.9086148 | 89.4292618 |
3.3. Data Collection
As part of the survey, Air Quality was measured in different locations of the Lalmonirhat District town area for two days with the help of various automated portable instruments, namely the Air Quality Monitor and the Handheld Carbon Monoxide Meter. GPS data was also collected by Garmin ETrex 10. Four individual data of PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and CO was collected from each location. Data was collected from 32 different locations by the CAPS team. Data was collected in different times in a day from morning to late evening. Sharing the instrument details below.
Table 2. Instrument Description for Air Quality Monitor (Particulate Matter).
S. N. | Instrument Name | Air Quality Monitor, Indoor Outdoor Formaldehyde (HCHO) Detector |
1. | Instrument Name | Air Quality Monitor, Indoor Outdoor Formaldehyde (HCHO) Detector |
2. | Brand | Saiko |
3. | Model | Model: DM106 B07SCM4YN3 |
4. | Measuring Parameter | PM1, PM2.5, PM10, HCHO, TVOC, AQI, Temperature, Humidity |
5. | PM2.5 /PM1/ PM10Technology | Laser Scattering |
6. | HCHO Technology | Electrochemistry sensor |
7. | TVOC Technology | Semiconductor sensor |
8. | Processor | ARM, High-speed complex calculations |
9. | Detection Range | AQI 0-500 |
10. | HCHO | 0.001-1.999 mg/m3 |
11. | TVOC | 0.001-9.999 mg/m3 |
12. | Temperature | 0-50C |
13. | Relative Humidity | 0-90% |
Figure 2. Air Quality Monitor, Indoor Outdoor Formaldehyde (HCHO) Detector.
3.4. Data Processing
Collected data was input into an IBM SPSS V20 and MS Excel 2020. The study used a formula for the conversion of the concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 to AQI. Formula for Conversion- To convert from concentration to AQI, this equation was used:
If multiple pollutants are measured, the calculated AQI is the highest value calculated from the above equation for each pollutant.
Where:
I = the (Air Quality) index
C = the pollutant concentration
C low = the concentration breakpoint that is ≤ C
C high = the concentration breakpoint that is ≥ C
I low = the index breakpoint corresponding to C low
I high = the index breakpoint corresponding to C high {\displaystyle C_{high}}
3.5. Map Preparation and Result Interpretation
MS Excel, IBM SPSS V20, and MS Excel 2020 were used for data analysis in this study. Various visual tools—including graphs, tables, diagrams, and box-whisker plots were generated to interpret the nature and distribution of the data. Descriptive statistics were applied to assess the dispersion of each parameter across different land use types, and ANOVA was conducted to test statistical significance. The results are presented through a combination of charts, graphs, and maps. For spatial analysis, ArcGIS 10.4.1 was used to develop both concentration and AQI maps for the Lalmonirhat District town area. Multiple projected locations were used in GIS to create detailed maps, with varying color schemes applied to indicate different concentration levels for enhanced interpretability.
4. Result and Discussion
4.1. Comparison among Concentration of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 at Different Landuse in Lalmonirhat District Area
Figure 3 (a) shows the concentration (µg/m
3) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of some locations in sensitive areas in Lalmonirhat district town. These particular locations included administrative offices, educational institutes, and mosques. As we could see, the government was among the three polluted places among these five sensitive places. Library, Church of God Convention Center, and Fellowship Church with PM
2.5 concentration of 110.25, 109.00, and 82.75 µg/m
3 respectively, and one contaminated place was the Land Office. A comparatively less polluted place was BGB Lalmonirhat. It has been observed that the concentration of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of the Govt. Library and Land Office were 66.00, 110.25, and 141.25 µg/m
3 and 25.00, 43.00, and 54.67 µg/m
3, respectively. It was also noted that the concentrations of PM
2.5 found in the most polluted location were 1.70 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), which is 65 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). The concentrations of PM
2.5 and PM
10 found in that location were 4.41 and 2.83 times higher than World Health Organization (WHO) standard level respectively. The Air Quality Standard (24-hour) set by the WHO for PM
2.5 and PM
10 are 25 and 50 µg/m
3 respectively. The study estimated that in all sensitive areas, 77.29% of PM
2.5 was present in PM
10 and 59.92% of the PM
1 was present in PM
2.5.
Figure 3 (b) shows the concentration (µg/m
3) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of some locations in mixed areas in Lalmonirhat district town. It has been found that out of 3 mixed places, one most polluted place was Taluk Kutamara with PM
2.5 concentration 139.75 µg/m
3 and comparatively less contaminated places were Gias Uddin High School and Bashundhara Dhara Mosque respectively. It has been observed that concentrations of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of Taluk Kutamara and Gias Uddin High School were 85.00, 139.75 and 177.67 µg/m
3 and 29.50, 48.75 and 63.25 µg/m
3 respectively. It was also noted that the concentrations of PM
2.5 and PM
10 found in the most polluted location were 2.15 and 1.18 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) which is 65 and 150 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). The study estimated that the ratio of PM
2.5 /PM
10 was 77.67%. It was also found that 60.82% of PM
1 mass was present in PM
2.5.
Figure 3 (c) shows the concentration (µg/m
3) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of some locations in residential areas in Lalmonirhat district town. It has been found that out of 3 residential places, two highly polluted places were Staf Quarter and East Harivanga and comparatively less contaminated place was Rahaman Monjil Complex. It has been observed that concentrations of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of Staf Quarter and Rahaman Monjil Complex were 68.00, 114.25 and 147.50 µg/m
3 and 23.75, 41.75 and 52.25 µg/m
3 respectively. It was also noted that the concentrations of PM
2.5 found in the most polluted location was 2.29 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) which is 65 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). However, the concentrations of PM
2.5 and PM
10 found in the most polluted location were 4.57 and 2.95 times higher than World Health Organization (WHO) standard level respectively. The Air Quality Standard (24-hour) set by the WHO for PM
2.5 and PM
10 are 25 and 50 µg/m
3 respectively. The concentrations of PM
2.5 of Staf Quarter and East Harivanga were found 114.25 and 85.25 µg/m
3. The study estimated that in all residential areas, 78.52% of PM
2.5 was present in PM
10 and 58.55% of the PM
1 was present in PM
2.5.
Figure 3 (d) shows the concentration (µg/m
3) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of some locations in road intersection areas in Lalmonirhat district town. It has been found that out of 5 road intersection places, three highly polluted places were TNT More, CP More and Mission More Lalmonirhat and comparatively least contaminated places were Alorupa More and Main Road, Lalmonirhat respectively. It has been observed that concentrations of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of TNT More and Alorupa More were found 77.50, 130.25 and 167.00 µg/m
3 and 31.75, 51.50 and 67.00 µg/m
3 respectively. It was also noted that the concentration of PM
2.5 and PM
10 found in the most polluted area were 2.61 and 1.11 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) which are 65 and 150 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). The study estimated that in all road intersection areas, 81.52% of PM
2.5 was present in PM
10 and 60.82% of the PM
1 was present in PM
2.5.
Figure 3. Comparison among Concentration of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 at Different Landuse in Lalmonirhat District Area.
Figure 3 (e) shows the concentration (µg/m
3) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of some locations in commercial areas in Lalmonirhat district town. It has been found that out of 9 commercial places, three polluted places were Shena Moitry Hawakers Market, Circuit House and Fakol Bus Stand and comperatively least contaminated places were BDR Bazar, Railway Station and Rajshahi Agriculture Development Bank. It has been observed that concentrations of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of Shena Moitry Hawakers Market and BDR Bazar were 63, 108 and 136 µg/m
3 and 26, 44 and 56 µg/m
3 respectively. It was also noted that the concentration of PM
2.5 found in the most polluted area was 2.16 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) which is 65 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). However, the concentrations of PM
2.5 and PM
10 found in the most polluted location were 4.32 and 2.72 times higher than World Health Organization (WHO) standard level respectively. The Air Quality Standard (24-hour) set by the WHO for PM
2.5 and PM
10 are 25 and 50 µg/m
3 respectively. The study estimated that in all commercial areas, 75.73% of PM
2.5 was present in PM
10 and 59.56% of the PM
1 was present in PM
2.5.
Figure 3 (f) shows the concentration (µg/m) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of some locations in industrial locations in Lalmonirhat district town. It has been found that out of 4 industrial places, three highly polluted places were West BSCIC, Fatema Cuton Cutting Mill and Jaman Poltry Fids Product and Industry with PM
2.5 concentration of 121.25, 111.33 and 106.75 µg/m
3 respectively and relatively less polluted place was Store BSCIC with PM
2.5 concentration 99.25 µg/m
3 respectively. It has been observed that concentration of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of West BSCIC and Store BSCIC were 75.75, 121.25 and 139.00 µg/m
3 and 61.75, 99.25 and 129.50 µg/m
3 respectively. It was also noted that the concentrations of PM
2.5 found in the most polluted area was 2.43 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) which is 65 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). However, the concentrations of PM
2.5 and PM
10 found in the most polluted location were 4.85 and 2.78 times higher than World Health Organization (WHO) standard level respectively. The Air Quality Standard (24-hour) set by the WHO for PM
2.5 and PM
10 are 25 and 50 µg/m
3 respectively. The study estimated that in Industrial areas, 80.31% of PM
2.5 was present in PM
10 and 60.98% of the PM
1 was present in PM
2.5.
Figure 3(g) shows the concentration (µg/m
3) of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of polluted locations in village areas in Lalmonirhat district town. It has been found that out of 3 village places, two most polluted places were the Station para and Harivanga and the less polluted place was Balatari respectively. It has been observed that concentrations of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 of the Station para and Balatari were 72.75, 121.50 and 156 µg/m
3 and 40.50, 67.75 and 86.50 µg/m
3 respectively. It was also noted that the concentrations of PM
2.5 and PM
10 were 2.43 and 1.04 times higher than Bangladesh National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) which are 65 and 150 µg/m
3 set by the Department of Environment (DoE). The study estimated that in village areas, 77.61% of PM
2.5 was present in PM
10 and 61.45% of the PM
1 was present in PM
2.5. However, the average concentration of PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 was found highest in industrial area followed by village and road intersection area with the values of 66.90, 109.65 and 136.42 µg/m
3, 57.08, 93.25 and 120.17 µg/m
3 and 55.40, 91.40 and 113.15 µg/m
3 respectively. Moreover, the concentration was found relatively lower in commercial area, residential area and mixed area. Furthermore, the average concentration of PM
1 (38.17 µg/m
3), PM
2.5 (63.92 µg/m
3) and PM
10 (84.31 µg/m
3) were found to be least in commercial area.
4.2. Descriptive Statistics of PM1 PM1, PM2.5, and PM10
The following
Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics for PM
1 of the studied seven land uses. The higher ranges were found in mixed area (55.50 µg/m
3) and road intersection area (45.75 µg/m
3) and lower ranges were found in industrial area (14.00 µg/m
3) and village area (28.25 µg/m
3). Among all those land uses the minimum concentration was seen in residential area (23.75 µg/m
3) and the maximum concentration was seen in mixed area (85.00 µg/m
3).The highest mean value of PM
1.0 was found in industrial area (66.90 µg/m
3) followed by village area (57.08 µg/m
3) and the lowest mean was found in commercial area (38.17 µg/m
3). The highest standard deviation was seen in mixed area (31.28 µg/m
3) and the lowest was seen in industrial area (6.67 µg/m
3). Table also shows that, the highest coefficient of variation was seen in mixed area which was 63.94% and lowest was seen in industrial area which was 9.97%. It was observed that the highest variation in the concentration of the PM
1 prevailed in mixed area followed by residential area. The less variation was found in industrial area prior to village area.
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics for PM1.
S. N. | Land Use | NoL | Range (µg/m3) | Min. (µg/m3) | Max. (µg/m3) | Mean (µg/m3) | Std. Deviation (µg/m3) | Coefficient of Variation (%) |
1. | Sensitive Area | 5 | 41.00 | 25.00 | 66.00 | 49.55 | 17.43 | 35.17 |
2. | Mixed Area | 3 | 55.50 | 29.50 | 85.00 | 48.92 | 31.28 | 63.94 |
3. | Residential Area | 3 | 44.25 | 23.75 | 68.00 | 47.42 | 22.29 | 47.00 |
4. | Road Intersection Area | 5 | 45.75 | 31.75 | 77.50 | 55.40 | 17.60 | 31.78 |
5. | Commercial Area | 9 | 36.75 | 25.75 | 62.50 | 38.17 | 14.90 | 39.05 |
6. | Industrial Area | 4 | 14.00 | 61.75 | 75.75 | 66.90 | 6.67 | 9.97 |
7. | Village Area | 3 | 28.25 | 44.50 | 72.75 | 57.08 | 14.38 | 25.18 |
The whisker box plot shows the average of PM1 concentrations in seven land uses illustrate in 4 (a). A horizontal black line within the box marks the median; the lower boundary of the box indicates the 25th percentile, the upper boundary of the box indicates the 75th percentile. The whisker represents the maximum (upper whisker) and minimum value (lower whisker) for each land use. Whisker box plot revealed that commercial area, mixed area, sensitive area and residential area had more dispersed concentration with highest in commercial area and mixed area and the spreading of area had positively skewed distribution. Moderate dispersion was found in road intersection area and village area where both of them were positively skewed. Another point was to be noted that the values of mixed area were comparatively higher than any other land uses of this district town. The concentration of PM1 had less distribution in industrial area and positively skewed distribution. The episode was found in Taluk Kutamara due to the ongoing development work (road reconstruction).
The following
Table 4 shows the descriptive statistics for PM
2.5 of the studied seven land uses. The higher ranges were found in The higher ranges were found in mixed area (91.00 µg/m
3) and road intersection area (78.75 µg/m
3) and lower ranges were found in industrial area (22.00 µg/m
3) and village area (50.00 µg/m
3). Among all those land uses the minimum concentration was seen in residential area (41.75 µg/m
3) and the maximum concentration was seen in mixed area (139.75 µg/m
3).The highest mean value of PM
2.5 was found in industrial area (109.65 µg/m
3) followed by village area (93.25 µg/m
3) and the lowest mean was found in commercial area (63.92 µg/m
3). The highest standard deviation was seen in mixed area (51.42 µg/m
3) and the lowest was seen in industrial area (9.20 µg/m
3). Table also shows that, the highest coefficient of variation was seen in mixed area which was 63.95% and lowest was seen in industrial area which was 8.39%. It was observed that the highest variation in the concentration of the PM
2.5 prevailed in mixed area followed by residential area. The reasons behind the higher dispersion in concentration in mixed area and residential were different types of vehicular movement and burning of fossil, fuel and biomass for cooking purpose. The less variation was found in industrial area and village area.
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for PM2.5.
S. N. | Land Use | NoL | Range (µg/m3) | Min. (µg/m3) | Max. (µg/m3) | Mean (µg/m3) | Std. Deviation (µg/m3) | Coefficient of Variation (%) |
1. | Sensitive Area | 5 | 67.25 | 43.00 | 110.25 | 82.45 | 28.57 | 34.65 |
2. | Mixed Area | 3 | 91.00 | 48.75 | 139.75 | 80.42 | 51.42 | 63.95 |
3. | Residential Area | 3 | 72.50 | 41.75 | 114.25 | 80.42 | 36.49 | 45.38 |
4. | Road Intersection Area | 5 | 78.75 | 51.50 | 130.25 | 91.40 | 30.18 | 33.02 |
5. | Commercial Area | 9 | 63.75 | 43.75 | 107.50 | 63.92 | 24.51 | 38.34 |
6. | Industrial Area | 4 | 22.00 | 99.25 | 121.25 | 109.65 | 9.20 | 8.39 |
7. | Village Area | 3 | 50.00 | 71.50 | 121.50 | 93.25 | 25.63 | 27.48 |
The whisker box plot demonstrates the average of PM2.5 concentrations in seven land uses illustrate in 4 (b). A horizontal black line within the box marks the median; the lower boundary of the box indicates the 25th percentile, the upper boundary of the box indicates the 75th percentile. The whisker represents the maximum (upper whisker) and minimum value (lower whisker) for each land use. Whisker box plot revealed that commercial area, mixed area, sensitive area and residential area had more dispersed concentration with highest in commercial area and mixed area and the spreading of area had positively skewed distribution. Moderate dispersion was found in road intersection area and village area where both of them were positively skewed. Another point was to be noted that the values of mixed area were comparatively higher than any other land uses of this district town. The concentration of PM1 had less distribution in industrial area and positively skewed distribution. This area was occupied with different types of vehicle in the survey time which might be reasons of relatively higher values of PM2.5 though the surveyed locations were only two.
The following table 5 shows the descriptive statistics for PM10 of the studied seven land uses. The higher ranges were found in mixed area (114.42 µg/m3) and road intersection area (100.00 µg/m3) and lower ranges were found in industrial area (12.17 µg/m3) and village area (64.75 µg/m3). Among all those land uses the minimum concentration was seen in residential area (52.25 µg/m3) and the maximum concentration was seen in mixed area (177.67 µg/m3).The highest mean value of PM10 was found in industrial area (136.42 µg/m3) followed by village area (120.17 µg/m3) and the lowest mean was found in commercial area (84.31 µg/m3). The highest standard deviation was seen in mixed area (64.66 µg/m3) and the lowest was seen in industrial area (5.26 µg/m3). Table also shows that, the highest coefficient of variation was seen in mixed area which was 62.75% and lowest was seen in industrial area which was 3.85%. It was observed that the highest variation in the concentration of the PM10 prevailed in mixed area followed by residential area where the concentration varies a lot. The less variation was found in industrial area followed by village area.
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for PM10.
S. N. | Land Use | NoL | Range (µg/m3) | Min. (µg/m3) | Max. (µg/m3) | Mean (µg/m3) | Std. Deviation (µg/m3) | Coefficient of Variation (%) |
1. | Sensitive Area | 5 | 86.58 | 54.67 | 141.25 | 106.65 | 36.34 | 34.07 |
2. | Mixed Area | 3 | 114.42 | 63.25 | 177.67 | 103.06 | 64.66 | 62.75 |
3. | Residential Area | 3 | 95.25 | 52.25 | 147.50 | 102.92 | 47.92 | 46.56 |
4. | Road Intersection Area | 5 | 100.00 | 67.00 | 167.00 | 113.15 | 40.36 | 35.67 |
5. | Commercial Area | 9 | 80.00 | 56.00 | 136.00 | 84.31 | 30.49 | 36.16 |
6. | Industrial Area | 4 | 12.17 | 129.50 | 141.67 | 136.42 | 5.26 | 3.85 |
7. | Village Area | 3 | 64.75 | 91.25 | 156.00 | 120.17 | 32.92 | 27.40 |
Figure 4. Whisker Box Plot showing the Concentration of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in Different Land use.
The whisker box plot shows the average of PM10 concentrations in seven land uses illustrate in 4 (b). A horizontal black line within the box marks the median; the lower boundary of the box indicates the 25th percentile, the upper boundary of the box indicates the 75th percentile. The whisker represents the maximum (upper whisker) and minimum value (lower whisker) for each land use. Whisker box plot revealed that commercial area, mixed area, sensitive area and residential area had more dispersed concentration with highest in commercial area and mixed area and the spreading of area had positively skewed distribution. Moderate dispersion was found in road intersection area and village area where both of them were positively skewed. Another point was to be noted that the values of mixed area were comparatively higher than any other land uses of this district town. The concentration of PM10 was tightly clustered in industrial area and negatively skewed distribution. The episode was found in Taluk Kutamara due to the ongoing development work (road reconstruction).
4.3. Significance Test
Table 6 shows ANOVA for the significant test. ANOVA has been performed to find whether the changes in the concentration of all the parameters between and within land uses are significant. Here the F value of found to be 1.468 for PM
1, 1.339 for PM
2.5 and 1.070 for PM
10 respectively. P values found for PM
1, PM
2.5, and PM
10 are 0.230, 0.277 and 0.406 respectively. The following tables revealed that the concentrations of none of the parameters change significantly as the p values are greater than 0.05. Therefore, the concentration of PM might not be changed significantly between and within in the land uses.
Table 6. Significance Test.
ANOVA |
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
PM1 | Between Groups | 2722.522 | 6 | 453.754 | 1.468 | 0.230 |
Within Groups | 7728.297 | 25 | 309.132 | | |
Total | 10450.819 | 31 | | | |
PM2.5 | Between Groups | 6823.550 | 6 | 1137.258 | 1.339 | 0.277 |
Within Groups | 21231.672 | 25 | 849.267 | | |
Total | 28055.222 | 31 | | | |
PM10 | Between Groups | 8847.643 | 6 | 1474.607 | 1.070 | 0.406 |
Within Groups | 34439.169 | 25 | 1377.567 | | |
Total | 43286.812 | 31 | | | |
4.4. Land Use Based Cluster Analysis
Figure 5 shows the dendrogram plot obtained from cluster analysis in terms of PM
1.0 with Z-score normalization. For this analysis, group linkage and Euclidean distance have been considered. Four clusters have been found from the below graph. The first cluster consists of sensitive area, mixed area and residential area; the second cluster includes road intersection area and village area; the third cluster is consisted of commercial area; and the fourth cluster includes industrial area alone. First and second clusters join at the approximate distance of 5 which joins with third cluster at the approximate distance of 15. This broad cluster joins with fourth cluster at the approximate distance of 25.
Figure 5 shows the dendrogram plot obtained from cluster analysis in terms of PM
2.5 with Z-score normalization. For this analysis, between-group linkage and Euclidean distance have been considered. Three clusters have been found from the below graph. The first cluster consists of residential area, mixed area, sensitive area, road intersection area and village area; the second cluster includes commercial area and the third cluster is consisted of industrial area alone. First and second clusters join at the approximate distance of 15 which joins with third cluster at the approximate distance of 25.
Figure 5 shows the dendrogram plot obtained from cluster analysis in terms of PM
10with Z-score normalization. For this analysis, between-group linkage and Euclidean distance have been considered. Three clusters have been found from the below graph. The first cluster consists of residential area, mixed area, sensitive area, road intersection area and village area; the second cluster includes commercial area and the third cluster is consisted of industrial area alone. First and second clusters join at the approximate distance of 15 which joins with third cluster at the approximate distance of 25.
Figure 5. Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine for PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in Different Land use.
4.5. Concentration Map of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 Lalmonirhat District Town in 2021
Figure 6 show the concentration of Particulate Matter (PM
1) at various location of Lalmonirhat District town area in the year of 2021. Concentrations of Particulate Matter (PM
1) are expressed in µg/m
3. The concentration of µg/m
3 means one-millionth of a gram of PM
1 per cubic meter of air. Yellow areas have less, while progressively higher concentrations are shown in orange and red. The concentration of PM
1 was found to higher (75-84 µg/m
3) in the Taluk Kutamara, TNT More and West BSCIC area. It also shows that PM
1 concentration was found (22-30 µg/m
3) in Rahaman Monjil Complex, Land Office, BDR Bazar, Railway Station, Rajshahi Agriculture Development Bank, Appolo Dayagonestic Center, Mosque Market and Gias Uddin High School. The maximum concentration shows with red flag and minimum concentration with green flag. The maximum concentration was found in Taluk Kutamara and the minimum concentration was found in Rahaman Monjil Complex.
Figure 6. PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 Concentration Map of Lalmonirhat District Town in 2021..
Figure 7. PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 Concentration Map of Lalmonirhat District Town in 2021.
Figure 8. PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 Concentration Map of Lalmonirhat District Town in 2021.
Figure 7 show the concentration of Particulate Matter (PM
2.5) at various location of Lalmonirhat District town area in the year of 2021. Concentrations of Particulate Matter (PM
2.5) are expressed in µg/m
3. The concentration of µg/m
3 means one-millionth of a gram of PM
2.5 per cubic meter of air. Yellow areas have little, while progressively higher concentrations are shown in orange and red. The concentration of PM
2.5 was found to higher (110-140 µg/m
3) in the Taluk Kutamara, TNT More, Station Para, West BSCIC, Staf Quarter, Fatema Cuton Cutting Mill and Govt. Library area. It also shows that PM
2.5 concentration was found (41-59 µg/m
3) in Rahaman Monjil Complex, Land Office, BDR Bazar, Railway Station, Rajshahi Agriculture Development Bank, Mosque Market, Gias Uddin High School, Appolo Dayagonestic Center, Alorupa More and Occupation Bank. The maximum concentration shows with red flag and minimum concentration with green flag. The maximum concentration was found in Taluk Kutamara and the minimum concentration was found in Rahaman Monjil Complex.
Figure 8 shows the concentration of Particulate Matter (PM
10) at various locations of Lalmonirhat District town area in the year 2021. Concentrations of Particulate Matter (PM
10) are expressed in µg/m
3. The concentration of µg/m
3 means one-millionth of a gram of PM
1 per cubic meter of air. Yellow areas have little, while progressively higher concentrations are shown in orange and red. The concentration of PM
10 was found to higher (141-180 µg/m
3) Taluk Kutamara, TNT More, Station Para, Staf Quarter, Fatema Cuton Cutting Mill, CP More and Govt. Library area. It also shows that PM
10 concentration was found (52-67 µg/m
3) in Rahaman Monjil Complex, Land Office, BDR Bazar, Railway Station, Rajshahi Agriculture Development Bank, Mosque Market, Gias Uddin High School and Alorupa More. The maximum concentration shows with red flag and minimum concentration with green flag. The maximum concentration was found in Taluk Kutamara and the minimum concentration was found in Rahaman Monjil Complex.
4.6. AQI on PM2.5 Concentration of Lalmonirhat District Town in 2021
Figure 9 Shows the Lalmonirhat District town area based on PM
2.5. In this map, different colors represent the category of AQI according to Bangladesh National Ambient Air Pollution Standard. The map shows that AQI (151-200) was unhealthy condition in the Taluk Kutamara, West BSCIC, Staf Quarter, TNT More, Station Para, Fatema Cuton Cutting Mill and the central part of the city which is indicating in red color. Also shows that, Rahaman Monjil Complex, Land Office, BDR Bazar, Railway Station, Rajshahi Agriculture Development Bank and the north side of the city were found in a cuation condition where the AQI was (101-150) which indicate by orange color. The maximum concentration was found in Taluk Kutamara which shows with red flag and the minimum concentration was found in Rahaman Monjil Complex that indicates with green flag.
Figure 9. AQI on PM2.5 Concentration Map of Lalmonirhat District Town in 2021.