In the last decades, the concepts of προαίρεσις (proairesis), προαιρετικὸν (proairetic) and ἀπροαίρετον (aproairetic) in the Stoic philosophy of Epictetus have aroused the interest, among others, of researchers like C. Cassanmagnago [1]; R. Dobbin [2-3], J. B. Gourinat [4], R. Kamtekar [5], R. Sorabji [6-7], R. S. Braicovich [8], K. Seddon [9] and A. A. Long [10]. The scope of this paper is to present a complete and as far as possible unequivocal picture of the subject. To this end I have produced a new translation and made a careful analysis of all the occurrences of the three terms in the works of Epictetus. The results I have reached show that the three concepts are perfectly clear in their meaning, without the need of translating them and with a simple transliteration from ancient Greek, as modern languages do not have an exact equivalent of such words.
Published in | International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11 |
Page(s) | 24-33 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Epictetus, Proairesis, Proairetic, Aproairetic, Nature of Things, Diairesis, Counterdiairesis
[1] | C. Cassanmagnago. “Il problema della prohairesis in Epitteto”. Rivista di filosofia Neoscolastica, 1977, LXIX, pp. 232-246. |
[2] | R. Dobbin. “Προαίρεσις in Epictetus”. Ancient Philosophy.1991, 11, pp. 1-36. |
[3] | R. Dobbin. (Ed.) Epictetus. Discourses Book I. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2008. |
[4] | J. B. Gourinat. “La proairesis chez Epictète: decision, volonté, ou personne morale?” Philosophie Antique. 2005, 5, pp. 93-133. |
[5] | R. Kamtekar.“ΑΙΔΩΣ in Epictetus”. Classical Philology. 1998, 43 (2), pp. 136-160. |
[6] | R. Sorabji, “Epictetus on proairesis and Self”. In Mason A. & Scaltsas (Eds.), The philosophy of Epictetus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2007, pp. 87-98. |
[7] | R. Sorabji. “Graeco-Roman varieties of Self”. In P. Remes and J. Sihvola (Eds.) Ancient philosophy of the Self. Springer, New York.2008,pp. 13-34. |
[8] | R. S. Braicovich. “On some rhetorical-pedagogical strategies in Epictetus Discourses concerning proairesis”. Eidos. 2013, 19, pp. 39-56 |
[9] | K. Seddon. Epictetus’ Handbook and the table of Cebes. Guides to Stoic living. New York Routledge. 2005. |
[10] | A. A. Long. Epictetus. A Stoic and Socratic guide to life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002 |
[11] | W. A. Oldfather. (Ed.) Epictetus. The Discourses as reported by Arrian. The Manual and the Fragments. London Heinemann.1961. |
APA Style
Franco Scalenghe. (2015). ‘Proairesis’, ‘Proairetic’ and ‘Aproairetic’: Synopsis of All the Passages Containing these Terms in the ‘Discourses’ and the ‘Manual’ of Epictetus. International Journal of Philosophy, 3(3), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11
ACS Style
Franco Scalenghe. ‘Proairesis’, ‘Proairetic’ and ‘Aproairetic’: Synopsis of All the Passages Containing these Terms in the ‘Discourses’ and the ‘Manual’ of Epictetus. Int. J. Philos. 2015, 3(3), 24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11
AMA Style
Franco Scalenghe. ‘Proairesis’, ‘Proairetic’ and ‘Aproairetic’: Synopsis of All the Passages Containing these Terms in the ‘Discourses’ and the ‘Manual’ of Epictetus. Int J Philos. 2015;3(3):24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11, author = {Franco Scalenghe}, title = {‘Proairesis’, ‘Proairetic’ and ‘Aproairetic’: Synopsis of All the Passages Containing these Terms in the ‘Discourses’ and the ‘Manual’ of Epictetus}, journal = {International Journal of Philosophy}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {24-33}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20150303.11}, abstract = {In the last decades, the concepts of προαίρεσις (proairesis), προαιρετικὸν (proairetic) and ἀπροαίρετον (aproairetic) in the Stoic philosophy of Epictetus have aroused the interest, among others, of researchers like C. Cassanmagnago [1]; R. Dobbin [2-3], J. B. Gourinat [4], R. Kamtekar [5], R. Sorabji [6-7], R. S. Braicovich [8], K. Seddon [9] and A. A. Long [10]. The scope of this paper is to present a complete and as far as possible unequivocal picture of the subject. To this end I have produced a new translation and made a careful analysis of all the occurrences of the three terms in the works of Epictetus. The results I have reached show that the three concepts are perfectly clear in their meaning, without the need of translating them and with a simple transliteration from ancient Greek, as modern languages do not have an exact equivalent of such words.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - ‘Proairesis’, ‘Proairetic’ and ‘Aproairetic’: Synopsis of All the Passages Containing these Terms in the ‘Discourses’ and the ‘Manual’ of Epictetus AU - Franco Scalenghe Y1 - 2015/07/04 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11 T2 - International Journal of Philosophy JF - International Journal of Philosophy JO - International Journal of Philosophy SP - 24 EP - 33 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7455 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20150303.11 AB - In the last decades, the concepts of προαίρεσις (proairesis), προαιρετικὸν (proairetic) and ἀπροαίρετον (aproairetic) in the Stoic philosophy of Epictetus have aroused the interest, among others, of researchers like C. Cassanmagnago [1]; R. Dobbin [2-3], J. B. Gourinat [4], R. Kamtekar [5], R. Sorabji [6-7], R. S. Braicovich [8], K. Seddon [9] and A. A. Long [10]. The scope of this paper is to present a complete and as far as possible unequivocal picture of the subject. To this end I have produced a new translation and made a careful analysis of all the occurrences of the three terms in the works of Epictetus. The results I have reached show that the three concepts are perfectly clear in their meaning, without the need of translating them and with a simple transliteration from ancient Greek, as modern languages do not have an exact equivalent of such words. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -