Citizenship, with its presumptive rights, privileges and obligations, has been a fundamental challenge confronting the state since the classical Greek era and the transformation and reorganization of the centralized medieval Holy Roman Empire after the Thirty Years War. With the changing patterns of state formation from the large and unwieldy empires organized into absolutist states to the more nationalistic/linguistic formations a recurring issue has been the constitutional or legal guarantees of the rights of the citizen as well as his/her obligations to the state. This paper engaged in a nuanced study of Plato’s Crito as it relates the contradictions of citizenship as social membership and as participation in the modern state. The primary objective was to adapt Socrates’ experience to discuss the citizenship challenge in the modern state and driven by the research question on the implications of the emergence of new challenges to the contradictions of citizenship. Social contract theory by Thomas Hobbes served as the theoretical framework. Data collection was mainly from secondary sources such as academic journals, books, newspapers and internet sources, and data analysis based on the content and textual analysis of extant and relevant literature on the subject matter. Conclusively, the study realized that citizenship in the modern state is determined largely by the protection, in various ramifications, given to the citizen by the state, but that given a change in the circumstances many would decline to die for the state. Accordingly, it recommended a mutualism in the relationship and responsibilities between that state and the citizen of the modern state, particularly the underdeveloped states of the Third World.
Published in | International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12 |
Page(s) | 17-27 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Citizenship, Obedience, Law, Obligation, Justice, Honour
[1] | Aguilar, D. D. (2002). Imperialism, Female Diaspora, and Feminism Retrieved from: http://redcritique.org›SeptOct02›imperialismfemaled |
[2] | Ake, C. (1979). Social Science as imperialism: The theory of political development. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press. |
[3] | Almond, G. A. & Verba, S. (1989). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. London: Sage Publications. |
[4] | Anderson, P. (2006). Passages from antiquity to feudalism. London: Verso Classics. |
[5] | Aristophanes (2017). Clouds, edited by Evan Hayes and Stephen Nimis. Oxford: Faenum Publishing. |
[6] | Aristotle (1999). Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Kitchener: Batoche Books. |
[7] | Barry, K. (1979). Female Sexual Slavery. Englewood Cliffs: NJ, Prentice-Hall. |
[8] | Bulmer, M. & Rees, A. M. ed. (1996). Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall. London: UCL Press. |
[9] | ECAS (2018). A Theory of Citizenship Rights. European Citizen Action Service (ECAS) Knowledge Centre (n.a.) - Retrieved from https://ecas.issuelab.org›resources |
[10] | Ekekwe, E. (2009). An introduction to political economy. Chuzzy Services. |
[11] | Fernandez, A. G. Ed. (n.d.). The Dialogues of Plato (428/27 - 348/47 BCE). Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.net/etext98/chmds10.txt |
[12] | Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume I: An introduction. Translated from the French by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books. |
[13] | Hegel, G. W. F. (2001a). The Philosophy of history. Kitchener: Batoche Books. |
[14] | Hegel, G. W. F. (2001b). Philosophy of right. Kitchener: Batoche Books Limited. |
[15] | Hobbes, T. (1982). Leviathan, with introduction by C. B. Macpherson. London: Penguin Books Ltd. |
[16] | Howard, M. M. (2009). The politics of citizenship in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[17] | Kaufmann, C. (Spring 1996). Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars. International Security, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 136-175. |
[18] | Locke, J. (1994). Two Treatises of Government, edited by Peter Laslett. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[19] | MacKinnon, C. A. (1991). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. |
[20] | Macpherson, C. B. (1992). The Real World of Democracy. House of Anansi Press Inc. |
[21] | Malešević, S. (2019). War, State Formation, and Nationalism. Dublin: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. |
[22] | McLellan, D. (2007). Marxism after Marx: An introduction. 4th edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[23] | Mill, J. S. (2016). On liberty and utilitarianism. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics. |
[24] | Mitchell, J. (2014). Woman’s Estate. London: Verso Radical Thinkers Series. |
[25] | Nnoli (1981). Path to Nigerian Development. Dakar: CODESRIA Book Series. |
[26] | Odmalm, P. (2005) Migration policies and political participation. Inclusion or intrusion in Western Europe? Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan, |
[27] | Onigu, O. ed. (1978). African social and political thought. Enugu: Fourth Dimension Publishers. |
[28] | Patton, S. (2019). The Peace of Westphalia and it affects on international relations, diplomacy and foreign policy. The Histories, Volume 10, Issue 1. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol10/iss1/5 |
[29] | Plato (2013). The Apology of Socrates, H. N. Fowler Translation, edited with introduction and notes by E. E. Garvin. |
[30] | Plato (2012). Crito. California: Creative Commons. Retrieved fromhttp://classics.mit.edu/Plato/crito.html |
[31] | Plato, (2007). The Republic. London: Penguin. |
[32] | Poulantzas, N. (1978). Political power and social classes. London: Verso Classics. |
[33] | Pranger, R. J. (1968). The Eclipse of Citizenship: Power and Participation in Contemporary Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc. |
[34] | Przeworski, A. (1998). The State and the citizen. Research Gate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228703581 |
[35] | Riesman, D. & Glazer, N. (1965). Criteria for political apathy, in Alvin Gouldner, ed. Studies in Leadership. New York: Kussel & Russell. |
[36] | Sabine, G. & Thorson, L. T. (2018): A History of Political Theory, 4th edition. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishers. |
[37] | Simić O. & Cernat, V. eds. (2012). Peace Psychology in the Balkans: Dealing with a Violent Past while 17 Building Peace, Peace Psychology Book Series. Târgu-Mureş: Springer Science. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1948-8_2. |
[38] | Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. London: Penguin Books. |
[39] | Sutherland, N. M. (1992). The Origins of the Thirty Years War and the Structure of European Politics. English Historical Review (EHR), July pp. 587-625. Longman Group UK Limited. |
[40] | Szayna, T. S. (1994). Ethnic conflict in central Europe and the Balkans: A framework and US policy options. Santa Monica: RAND. |
[41] | Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[42] | Turner, B. S. (n.d.). Contemporary Problems in the Theory of Citizenship, retrieved from https://pdfcoffee.com› turner-contemporary-problems. |
[43] | Turner, B. S. (1990). Outline of a Theory of Citizenship, Sociology, XXIV, 2, pp. 189-214. |
[44] | Wendling, K. (2008). A Classification of Feminist Theories Volume 3, Number 2, Fall URI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1044593ar. Retrieved from https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1044593ar |
APA Style
Matthew Dayi Ogali. (2023). Plato’s Crito and the Contradictions of Modern Citizenship. International Journal of Philosophy, 11(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12
ACS Style
Matthew Dayi Ogali. Plato’s Crito and the Contradictions of Modern Citizenship. Int. J. Philos. 2023, 11(2), 17-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12
AMA Style
Matthew Dayi Ogali. Plato’s Crito and the Contradictions of Modern Citizenship. Int J Philos. 2023;11(2):17-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12, author = {Matthew Dayi Ogali}, title = {Plato’s Crito and the Contradictions of Modern Citizenship}, journal = {International Journal of Philosophy}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, pages = {17-27}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20231102.12}, abstract = {Citizenship, with its presumptive rights, privileges and obligations, has been a fundamental challenge confronting the state since the classical Greek era and the transformation and reorganization of the centralized medieval Holy Roman Empire after the Thirty Years War. With the changing patterns of state formation from the large and unwieldy empires organized into absolutist states to the more nationalistic/linguistic formations a recurring issue has been the constitutional or legal guarantees of the rights of the citizen as well as his/her obligations to the state. This paper engaged in a nuanced study of Plato’s Crito as it relates the contradictions of citizenship as social membership and as participation in the modern state. The primary objective was to adapt Socrates’ experience to discuss the citizenship challenge in the modern state and driven by the research question on the implications of the emergence of new challenges to the contradictions of citizenship. Social contract theory by Thomas Hobbes served as the theoretical framework. Data collection was mainly from secondary sources such as academic journals, books, newspapers and internet sources, and data analysis based on the content and textual analysis of extant and relevant literature on the subject matter. Conclusively, the study realized that citizenship in the modern state is determined largely by the protection, in various ramifications, given to the citizen by the state, but that given a change in the circumstances many would decline to die for the state. Accordingly, it recommended a mutualism in the relationship and responsibilities between that state and the citizen of the modern state, particularly the underdeveloped states of the Third World.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Plato’s Crito and the Contradictions of Modern Citizenship AU - Matthew Dayi Ogali Y1 - 2023/05/24 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12 T2 - International Journal of Philosophy JF - International Journal of Philosophy JO - International Journal of Philosophy SP - 17 EP - 27 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7455 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.12 AB - Citizenship, with its presumptive rights, privileges and obligations, has been a fundamental challenge confronting the state since the classical Greek era and the transformation and reorganization of the centralized medieval Holy Roman Empire after the Thirty Years War. With the changing patterns of state formation from the large and unwieldy empires organized into absolutist states to the more nationalistic/linguistic formations a recurring issue has been the constitutional or legal guarantees of the rights of the citizen as well as his/her obligations to the state. This paper engaged in a nuanced study of Plato’s Crito as it relates the contradictions of citizenship as social membership and as participation in the modern state. The primary objective was to adapt Socrates’ experience to discuss the citizenship challenge in the modern state and driven by the research question on the implications of the emergence of new challenges to the contradictions of citizenship. Social contract theory by Thomas Hobbes served as the theoretical framework. Data collection was mainly from secondary sources such as academic journals, books, newspapers and internet sources, and data analysis based on the content and textual analysis of extant and relevant literature on the subject matter. Conclusively, the study realized that citizenship in the modern state is determined largely by the protection, in various ramifications, given to the citizen by the state, but that given a change in the circumstances many would decline to die for the state. Accordingly, it recommended a mutualism in the relationship and responsibilities between that state and the citizen of the modern state, particularly the underdeveloped states of the Third World. VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -