Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Engel’s Biopsychosocial Model in Engineering: Humanistic Education for Engineers, a Systemic View and Practice

Received: 13 October 2025     Accepted: 27 October 2025     Published: 9 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A research on the endogenous nature of the biopsychosocial model in engineering shows that, except for a period of time after the Second World War in the twentieth century, pointed out that those human actions identified as engineering actions have always been framed by history (time, chronological components), cultural issues (traditions, customs, beliefs, habits, future expectations, level of education, and marital status in the case of individuals), economic context, social aspects (family ties in the case of individuals, community relationships, religion, for example), affiliations, and political tendencies. An Analytical–synthetic method was used to collect and study institutional and theoretical documents. In addition, abduction as a mode of inference (Peirce’s method), since abductive conclusions provide the starting point for retroductive inferences. This rationale challenges engineering thinking and engineering education to educate engineers as more than artifact builders, but as world citizens, wide-view professional with abilities and capabilities to design situated technological objects according to a complex view of the present and future. In other words, to educate engineers in the biopsychosocial and cultural approach to develop not only to teach technical abilities, but to develop life-long capacities to transform and construct a sustainable world it is not only relevant for the twenty first century but it is inherent to the nature of engineering.

Published in International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 13, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13
Page(s) 164-174
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biopsychosocial Model, Biopsychosocial and Cultural Approach, Engel’s Model, Philosophy of Engineering, Engineering Thinking, Engineering Knowledge, Engineering Education

References
[1] Engel, G. L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine, Science. 1977, 196 (4286), 129-136.
[2] Matiz Camacho, H. “Training and dissemination of the biopsychosocial and cultural approach at El Bosque University” (Formacion y difusion del enfoque biopsicosocial y cultural en la Universidad El Bosque). In: Cardenas Lopez, H. I. c. Bogota D. C.: Universidad El Bosque, 2016, 49-65.
[3] Frankl, V. E. The doctor and the soul. An introduction to logotherapy. Knopf, 1988; Random House Group: 1946.
[4] Lugg, W. The biopsychosocial model–history, controversy and Engel. Australasian Psychiatry. 2022, 30(1), 55-59.
[5] Grinker Sr, R. R. Training of a psychiatrist-psychoanalyst. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis. 1994, 22(2), 343-350.
[6] Grinker Sr, R. R. Open-system psychiatry, American Journal of Psychoanalysis. 1966, 26(2), 115.
[7] Von Bertalanffy, L., Zu einer allgemeninen Systemlebre, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 1945, 18, (3/4). (Towards a General Systems Theory). Also published as: An outline of General System Theory, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, I. 1950. Published also as: von Bertalanffy, L. Some System Concepts in Elementary Mathematical Consideration, Chapter 3. In: von Bertalanffy, L. General System General Systems Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications. New York, N. Y. George Braziller: 1969, 54-88.
[8] Von Bertalanffy, L. General Systems Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications, New York, N. Y.: George Braziller; 1969.
[9] Bush, V. The endless frontier, report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research. Office of Scientific Research and Development. United States Printing Office, Washington D. C.: 1945.
[10] Poser, H. On structural differences between science and engineering. Society for Philosophy and Technology, Quarterly Electronic Journal, 1998, 4 (2), 128-135.
[11] Bucciarelli, L. Engineering philosophy. DUP Satellite; an imprint of Delft University Press; 2003.
[12] Goldman, S. L. Why we need a philosophy of engineering: a work in progress. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2004, 29 (2), 163-176.
[13] McCarthy, N. What use is philosophy of engineering? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2007, 32 (4), 320-325.
[14] Verbeek, P-P. Accompanying Technology: Philosophy of Technology after the Ethical Turn, Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology. 2010, 14 (1), 49-54.
[15] Lopez-Cruz, O. The scientific pretensions of engineers: a study of the epistemology of engineering. (Las pretensiones cientificistas de los ingenieros: un estudio a la epistemologia de la ingeniería). Hojas de El Bosque. 2017, 3(5), 52-59.
[16] Lopez-Cruz, O. (2020). From philosophy of technology to philosophy of engineering. Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia, 20(41), 63-111.
[17] Lopez-Cruz, O. An essential definition of engineering to support engineering research in the twenty-first century, Journal of Philosophy. 2022, 10 (4), 130-137.
[18] Ross, A., Athanassoulis, N. The social nature of engineering and its implications for risk taking, Science and Engineering Ethics. 2010, 16 (1), 147-168.
[19] ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2023). "ABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs." Baltimore, MD. 2023.
[20] Simondon, G. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Translated from the French by Ninian Mellamphy with a Preface by John Hart University of Western Ontario, June 1980: Aubier, Editions Montaigne, Paris: 1958.
[21] Simondon, G. On the mode of existence of technical objects. Deleuze Studies. 2011, 5 (3), 407-424.
[22] Peirce, C. S. Charles S. Peirce, Collected Papers (8 vols.), Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958. (Usually referred as CP).
[23] Ayim, M. Retroduction: The rational instinct, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 1974, 10 (1) 1, 34-43.
[24] Ritz, B. Comparing abduction and retroduction in Peircean pragmatism and critical realism, Journal of Critical Realism. 2020, 19 (5), 456-465.
[25] Otero Cadena, M. Prologo. In: Cadenas Lopez, H. I. The biopsychosocial and cultural approach in the training of health professionals at El Bosque University. Origins, developments and challenges. (El enfoque biopsicosocial y cultural en la formacion de los profesionales de la salud en la Universidad El Bosque. Procedencias, despliegues y desafios. Bogota D. C.; Universidad El Bosque, 2016, 13-15.
[26] Aristizabal Aristizabal, G. Presentacion. In Cardenas Lopez, H. I., Aristizabal Tobler, C, and Mosquera Soto, B. Reflexiones sobre un Programa. Bogota D. C.: Universidad El Bosque, 2023.
[27] Guerra, A. El modelo Biopsicosocial y cultural. In: Donoso Suarez, I. A. El paciente desde la perspectiva biopsicosocial, Bogota D. C.: Universidad El Bosque, 2010, 21-29.
[28] Lopez-Cruz, O. On the systematic and the systemic, Journal of Technology. 2002, 1(1), 47-50.
[29] Ramirez Avila, G. M. Complex and complicated: specialization and interdisciplinarity (Complejo y complicado: especializacion e interdisciplinariedad), Revista Boliviana de Educacion Superior en Ciencia. 2006, 6. 21-29.
[30] Erdi, P. Complexity explained. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2008.
[31] San Miguel, M., Johnson, J. H., Kertesz, J., Kaski, K., Diaz-Guilera, A. Challenges in complex systems science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2012, 214(1), 245-271.
[32] Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S. Research perspectives: the anatomy of a design principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2020, 21 (6), 1622-1652.
[33] Sole, R. Complex networks: from the genome to the Internet (Redes complejas: del genoma a Internet). Tusquets Editores S. A.: 2016.
[34] Morin, E. The seven types of knowledge necessary for the education of the future. Originally published in October, 1999 by United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture, - 7 place de Fontenoy - 75352 Paris 07 SP - France. © Unesco: 1999.
[35] Orchard, R. A. On an approach to general systems theory. In: von Bertalanffy, L., Ashby, W. R, Weinberg, G. M. Trends in General Systems Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 1972.
[36] Escobar Triana, J. Humanistic and social education for physicians: the experience of the Colombian School of Medicine. The Journal of medicine and philosophy. 1996, 21(6), 651-657.
[37] Tomasello, M. The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press. 248 pp. Harvard University Press: 2000.
[38] Braitenberg, V. Selection, the impersonal engineer, Artificial Life. 1998, 4(4), 309-310.
[39] Dennett, D. C. Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life, The Sciences. Simon & Schuster (original hardcover) 1995, 34-40.
[40] Mayr, E. The ideological resistance to Darwin's theory of natural selection. In Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1991 135(2), 123-139.
[41] Aldana Valdes, E. Crisis in Colombian Engineering at the end of the 20th Century? (¿Crisis de la ingenieria colombiana al final del siglo XX?). Revista de Ingenieria. 1999, 9, 7-17.
[42] Valencia Restrepo, D. Crisis and future of engineering (Crisis y futuro de la ingeniería). Ingenieria y competitividad. 2000, 2 (2), 63-68.
[43] Serna, E., Serna, A. Is engineering in crisis worldwide? A review of the literature (¿Esta en crisis la ingenieria en el mundo? Una revision a la literatura), Revista Facultad de Ingenieria Universidad de Antioquia. 2013, 66, 199-208.
[44] Serna, E., Serna, A. Engineering crisis in Colombia – State of the issue (Crisis de la Ingenieria en Colombia-Estado de la cuestión). Ingenieria y competitividad. 2015, 17(1), 63-74.
[45] Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., Pathak, S. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct, Academy of management review. 2006, 31(4), 833-863.
[46] Lopez-Cruz, O., Garnica, N. J. Engineering organizational absorptive capacity for effective knowledge transfer. In International Conference on Software Process Improvement. Cham: Springer International Publishing, J. Mejia et al. (eds.), Trends and Applications in Software Engineering, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 688. 2018.
[47] Pu, K., Liu, W. Is absorptive capacity the" panacea" for organizational development? A META analysis of absorptive capacity and firm performance from the perspective of constructivism, Plos one. 2023, 18.2: e0282321.
[48] Panaia, M. Los graduados en ingenieria en el mundo, Perfiles. 2013, 8(19), 1-2.
[49] Koen, B. V. Debunking contemporary myths concerning engineering. In Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, 115-138.
[50] El-Zein, A. H., Hedemann, C. Beyond problem solving: Engineering and the public good in the 21st century, Journal of cleaner production. 2016, 137, 692-700.
[51] De Vries, M. J. Engineering science as a “discipline of the particular”? Types of generalization in engineering sciences. In Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands: 2009, 83-93.
[52] Goris, T. V., Dyrenfurth, M. J. Concepts and misconceptions in engineering, technology and science. Overview of research literature. In Proc. Amer. Soc. Eng. Educ. IL/IN Sectional Conf. Valparaiso. 2012, March.
[53] Lerch, C., & Dmitruk, A. E. On Training Tngineers for the New Century (Acerca de la Formacion de los Ingenieros para el Nuevo Siglo). In Grinsztajn, F., Imperiale, M. & Autoridades UNLAM (2017), Enseñanza de la Ingenieria Hacia un Modelo Pedagogico Transformador 125. Universidad Nacional de la Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires, Argentina: 2017.
[54] Frankel, R. M., Quill, T. E., McDaniel, S. H. (Eds.). The biopsychosocial approach: Past, present, and future. University Rochester Press: 2003.
[55] Longino, C. F. The old age challenge to the biomedical model: Paradigm strain and health policy. Routledge: 2020.
[56] Fink, P. J. Changing Values in American Society and American Psychiatry, Psychiatric Annals. 2014, 44(5), 248-252.
[57] Cardenas Lopez, H. I. The biopsychosocial and cultural approach in the training of health professionals at El Bosque University. Origins, developments and challenges. (El enfoque biopsicosocial y cultural en la formacion de los profesionales de la salud en la Universidad El Bosque. Procedencias, despliegues y desafíos). Universidad El Bosque, Bogota D. C.: 2016.
[58] Lopez-Cruz, O., Ortiz, C. H. Educating computer engineers as innovation managers: Transformers of lives, builders of possible futures. Mexico. ANFEI Digital 2017, 7.
[59] Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (Eds.). The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Amsterdam: JAI-Elsevier: 2000.
[60] Koen, B. V. Definition of the Engineering Method. ASEE Publications, Suite 200, 11 Dupont Circle, Washington, DC 20036: 1985.
[61] Koen, B. V. Toward a definition of the engineering method, European Journal of Engineering Education. 1988, 13(3), 307-315.
[62] Hidalgo, A The "System" of General Systems Theory: A Critical Re-examination, El Basilisco. 1978, l, 57-63.
[63] Leydesdorff L. The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Universal-Publishers; 2006.
[64] Hevner A, Chatterjee S. Design research in information systems: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media; 2010 Jun 14.
[65] Lopez-Cruz O, Munoz V. Worker, work and society: A relationship that becomes more complex through interaction. Journal of Technology. 2006, 5(2), 59-77.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lopez-Cruz, O. (2025). The Engel’s Biopsychosocial Model in Engineering: Humanistic Education for Engineers, a Systemic View and Practice. International Journal of Philosophy, 13(4), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lopez-Cruz, O. The Engel’s Biopsychosocial Model in Engineering: Humanistic Education for Engineers, a Systemic View and Practice. Int. J. Philos. 2025, 13(4), 164-174. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lopez-Cruz O. The Engel’s Biopsychosocial Model in Engineering: Humanistic Education for Engineers, a Systemic View and Practice. Int J Philos. 2025;13(4):164-174. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13,
      author = {Orlando Lopez-Cruz},
      title = {The Engel’s Biopsychosocial Model in Engineering: Humanistic Education for Engineers, a Systemic View and Practice},
      journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
      volume = {13},
      number = {4},
      pages = {164-174},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20251304.13},
      abstract = {A research on the endogenous nature of the biopsychosocial model in engineering shows that, except for a period of time after the Second World War in the twentieth century, pointed out that those human actions identified as engineering actions have always been framed by history (time, chronological components), cultural issues (traditions, customs, beliefs, habits, future expectations, level of education, and marital status in the case of individuals), economic context, social aspects (family ties in the case of individuals, community relationships, religion, for example), affiliations, and political tendencies. An Analytical–synthetic method was used to collect and study institutional and theoretical documents. In addition, abduction as a mode of inference (Peirce’s method), since abductive conclusions provide the starting point for retroductive inferences. This rationale challenges engineering thinking and engineering education to educate engineers as more than artifact builders, but as world citizens, wide-view professional with abilities and capabilities to design situated technological objects according to a complex view of the present and future. In other words, to educate engineers in the biopsychosocial and cultural approach to develop not only to teach technical abilities, but to develop life-long capacities to transform and construct a sustainable world it is not only relevant for the twenty first century but it is inherent to the nature of engineering.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Engel’s Biopsychosocial Model in Engineering: Humanistic Education for Engineers, a Systemic View and Practice
    AU  - Orlando Lopez-Cruz
    Y1  - 2025/12/09
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13
    T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
    JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
    JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
    SP  - 164
    EP  - 174
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7455
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20251304.13
    AB  - A research on the endogenous nature of the biopsychosocial model in engineering shows that, except for a period of time after the Second World War in the twentieth century, pointed out that those human actions identified as engineering actions have always been framed by history (time, chronological components), cultural issues (traditions, customs, beliefs, habits, future expectations, level of education, and marital status in the case of individuals), economic context, social aspects (family ties in the case of individuals, community relationships, religion, for example), affiliations, and political tendencies. An Analytical–synthetic method was used to collect and study institutional and theoretical documents. In addition, abduction as a mode of inference (Peirce’s method), since abductive conclusions provide the starting point for retroductive inferences. This rationale challenges engineering thinking and engineering education to educate engineers as more than artifact builders, but as world citizens, wide-view professional with abilities and capabilities to design situated technological objects according to a complex view of the present and future. In other words, to educate engineers in the biopsychosocial and cultural approach to develop not only to teach technical abilities, but to develop life-long capacities to transform and construct a sustainable world it is not only relevant for the twenty first century but it is inherent to the nature of engineering.
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections