As a result of volatility dynamics, investors and other stakeholders in businesses and industries have difficulty making financial decisions. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models are the most widely applied in the analysis of financial derivatives volatility. Volatility persistence is a common issue when analyzing stock prices, making it cumbersome for GARCH models. The GARCH model is transformed into the Makov switching GARCH model to check for dynamics in volatility persistence. Markov Regime-Switching GARCH (MSGARCH) models permit the conditional mean and variance to change across regimes over time. The Markov switching GARCH models incorporate the regime variables in the parameter space, making it viable for the parameters to be estimated by the maximum likelihood estimation method, unlike the classical GARCH models. Zenith Bank plc’s daily closing stock prices, a top-tier stock on the Nigerian Stock Exchange market, are fitted using the GARCH and MSGARCH models. The comparison between the MSGARCH model and the classical GARCH model was verified using the AIC and BIC metrics as well as the one with the maximum log likelihood estimates. The outcome suggests that MSGARCH model performs better than the single-regime GARCH model and that it yields significantly better out of-sample volatility forecasts. The results will aid the stakeholders to leverage and mitigate risks in their investment on the selected stocks.
Published in | International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13 |
Page(s) | 24-34 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Volatility, GARCH Process, Regime-Switching, Markov Process, Maximum Likelihood Estimation
[1] | Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. and Nelson, D. (1994). ARCH Models, in Handbook of Econometrics, ed. by R. Engle, and D. McFadden, North Holland Press, Amsterdam, chap. 4, pp. 2959–3038. |
[2] | Diebold, F. X. (1986). Modeling the persistence of conditional variances: A comment, Econometric Reviews 5: 51-56. |
[3] | Lamoureux, C. G., Lastrapes, W. D. (1990). Persistence in variance, structural change and the GARCH model, J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 8: 225–234. |
[4] | Mikosch, T. and Starica, C. (2004). Non-stationarities in financial time series, the long-range dependence and the IGARCH Effects, Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 378-390. |
[5] | Schwert, G. W. (1989). Why does stock market volatility change over time?, Journal of Finance 44: 1115-1153. |
[6] | Franses, P.H.; Van Dijk, D. (1996). Forecasting stock market volatility using (non-linear) Garch models, J. Forecast. 15: 229–235. |
[7] | Haas, M., Mittnik, S., and Paolella, M. S. (2018). A new approach to Markov switching GARCH models. Journal of Financial Econometrics 2 (4): 493–530. |
[8] | Gray, S. F. (1996a). Modeling the conditional distribution of interest rates as a regime- switching process, Journal of Financial Economics 42: 27–62. |
[9] | Chung-Ming Kuan. (2002). Lecture on the markov switching model, Institute of Economics Academia Sinica. Available at www.sinica.edu.tw/as/ssrc/ckuan. |
[10] | Klaassen, F. J. G. M. (2002). Improving GARCH Volatility Forecasts with Regime-Switching GARCH. Advances in Markov-Switching Models 223-254. |
[11] | Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31: 307-327. |
[12] | Jason B. (2018). How to model volatility with ARCH and GARCH for time series forecasting in Python. Available at machinelearningmastery.com |
[13] | Bauwens, L., Preminger, A., Rombouts, J. V. K. (2010). Theory and inference for a Markov switching GARCH model, Econometrics Journal 13: 218-244. |
[14] | Lin, C. C., Hung, M. W. and Kuan, C. M. (2002). The dynamic behavior of short term interest rates in Taiwan: An application of the regime switching model (in Chinese), Academia Economic Papers 30: 29–55. |
[15] | Sachin, Date (2021). A worm’s eye-view of the Markov switching dynamic regression model. Available at towardsdatascience.com |
[16] | Gray, S.F. (1996b). An analysis of conditional Regime-Switching models, Working Paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. |
[17] | Mohd, Azizi Amin Nunian; Siti, Meriam Zahari and Sarifah, Radiah Shariff (2020). Modelling foreign exchange rates: a comparison between Markov-switching and Markov-switching GARCH, Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Vol. 20, No. 2: 917-923. |
[18] | Onyeka-Ubaka, J. N., Ogundeji, R. K., Okafor, R. U. (2021). Time series filters applied to improve Box-Jenkins forecasting approach, Benin Journal of Statistics, ISSN 2682-5767. Vol.4: 31-52. |
[19] | Caporale, G.M.; Zekokh, T. (2019). Modelling volatility of cryptocurrencies using Markov-Switching GARCH models. Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 48: 143–155. |
[20] | Yuehchao Wu and Remya Kannan (2017). Time series analysis of Apple stock prices using GARCH models. Available at https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws.com |
[21] | Ardia, D.; Bluteau, K.; Boudt, K.; Catania, L.; Trottier, D. A. (2019). Markov-switching GARCH models in R: The MSGARCH package. J. Stat. Softw., 91. |
APA Style
Rosemary Ukamaka Okafor, Josephine Nneamaka Onyeka-Ubaka. (2023). Analyzing Dynamic Regimes of GARCH Model on Stock Price Volatility. International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 9(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13
ACS Style
Rosemary Ukamaka Okafor; Josephine Nneamaka Onyeka-Ubaka. Analyzing Dynamic Regimes of GARCH Model on Stock Price Volatility. Int. J. Stat. Distrib. Appl. 2023, 9(1), 24-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13
AMA Style
Rosemary Ukamaka Okafor, Josephine Nneamaka Onyeka-Ubaka. Analyzing Dynamic Regimes of GARCH Model on Stock Price Volatility. Int J Stat Distrib Appl. 2023;9(1):24-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13, author = {Rosemary Ukamaka Okafor and Josephine Nneamaka Onyeka-Ubaka}, title = {Analyzing Dynamic Regimes of GARCH Model on Stock Price Volatility}, journal = {International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {24-34}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsd.20230901.13}, abstract = {As a result of volatility dynamics, investors and other stakeholders in businesses and industries have difficulty making financial decisions. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models are the most widely applied in the analysis of financial derivatives volatility. Volatility persistence is a common issue when analyzing stock prices, making it cumbersome for GARCH models. The GARCH model is transformed into the Makov switching GARCH model to check for dynamics in volatility persistence. Markov Regime-Switching GARCH (MSGARCH) models permit the conditional mean and variance to change across regimes over time. The Markov switching GARCH models incorporate the regime variables in the parameter space, making it viable for the parameters to be estimated by the maximum likelihood estimation method, unlike the classical GARCH models. Zenith Bank plc’s daily closing stock prices, a top-tier stock on the Nigerian Stock Exchange market, are fitted using the GARCH and MSGARCH models. The comparison between the MSGARCH model and the classical GARCH model was verified using the AIC and BIC metrics as well as the one with the maximum log likelihood estimates. The outcome suggests that MSGARCH model performs better than the single-regime GARCH model and that it yields significantly better out of-sample volatility forecasts. The results will aid the stakeholders to leverage and mitigate risks in their investment on the selected stocks.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Analyzing Dynamic Regimes of GARCH Model on Stock Price Volatility AU - Rosemary Ukamaka Okafor AU - Josephine Nneamaka Onyeka-Ubaka Y1 - 2023/02/27 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13 T2 - International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications JF - International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications JO - International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications SP - 24 EP - 34 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-3509 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20230901.13 AB - As a result of volatility dynamics, investors and other stakeholders in businesses and industries have difficulty making financial decisions. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models are the most widely applied in the analysis of financial derivatives volatility. Volatility persistence is a common issue when analyzing stock prices, making it cumbersome for GARCH models. The GARCH model is transformed into the Makov switching GARCH model to check for dynamics in volatility persistence. Markov Regime-Switching GARCH (MSGARCH) models permit the conditional mean and variance to change across regimes over time. The Markov switching GARCH models incorporate the regime variables in the parameter space, making it viable for the parameters to be estimated by the maximum likelihood estimation method, unlike the classical GARCH models. Zenith Bank plc’s daily closing stock prices, a top-tier stock on the Nigerian Stock Exchange market, are fitted using the GARCH and MSGARCH models. The comparison between the MSGARCH model and the classical GARCH model was verified using the AIC and BIC metrics as well as the one with the maximum log likelihood estimates. The outcome suggests that MSGARCH model performs better than the single-regime GARCH model and that it yields significantly better out of-sample volatility forecasts. The results will aid the stakeholders to leverage and mitigate risks in their investment on the selected stocks. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -