National electricity-planning frameworks are increasingly constrained by their inability to internalise cross-border complementarities in renewable resources, demand profiles and flexibility needs. This paper evaluates whether a regionally coordinated dynamic-pricing mechanism, combined with cross-border interconnection and shared energy storage, can improve the economic and environmental performance of an interconnected power system in West Africa. A multi-period, multi-country optimisation framework is formulated for five ECOWAS member states (Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, The Gambia and Guinea) and applied to three configurations: an isolated national system, a statically priced regional interconnection, and a fully coordinated regional system combining dynamic pricing with shared storage. Because each configuration relaxes the decision space of the previous one, a monotonic cost improvement is expected by construction, so results are read as evidence on the magnitude of that improvement rather than as an independent test of each mechanism. Within this scope, the coordinated configuration reaches, by 2050, an average cost of 45.86 FCFA/kWh and a renewable share of 68.46% without modelled subsidies. A central finding, less directly implied by the scenario structure, is that these gains are not accompanied by larger cross-border flows: exchange volumes fall from roughly 5,000 MWh/day under static interconnection to about 850 MWh/day once shared storage is activated, indicating that temporal flexibility can substitute, in part, for spatial flexibility. Thermal emissions are also lower than under static interconnection, though not comparable to the isolated case owing to differing system boundaries. As the storage and pricing mechanisms have not yet been decomposed and no sensitivity analysis has been run, these results are exploratory rather than confirmatory. With that caveat, they support treating regional electricity pricing as a coordination instrument for interconnection and storage policy, discussed alongside the institutional conditions - harmonised rules, transparent burden-sharing, and consumer protection - required within the WAPP/EEEOA framework.
| Published in | International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy (Volume 15, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14 |
| Page(s) | 125-139 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Regional Electricity Market, Dynamic Pricing, Shared Storage, Cross-Border Interconnection, Renewable Integration, West African Power Pool, Senegal
| [1] | Diassy, D., Sow, F., Faye, J. J., Samb, M. L., Mohamed-Yahya, A. Comparative Modeling of Electricity Tariff Schemes in Senegal and Implications for the Energy Transition by 2050. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2025, 13(10), 904–918. |
| [2] | Diassy, D., Sow, F., Sam, M., Faye, J. J., Samb, M. L. Dynamic Optimization of Electricity Tariffs in Senegal: A Pyomo-Based Model for a Resilient Renewable Energy Mix Toward 2050. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering. 2026, 15(1), 27–36. |
| [3] | Diassy, D., Touré, M., Thiam, N., Touré, A., Sow, F., Fal, S. K., Samb, M. L. Robust Dynamic Electricity Pricing under Uncertainty: A Stochastic-Behavioral Optimization Approach for Senegal. Open Journal of Applied Sciences. 2026, 16(4), 1298–1322. |
| [4] | West African Power Pool. WAPP/EEEOA Official Website. Cotonou, Benin, 2026. |
| [5] | World Bank. Powering Africa: The Transformational Impact of Regional Energy Projects in West Africa. World Bank, Washington DC, 2025. |
| [6] | World Bank. Connecting West Africa through Regional Power Integration and Expanded Electricity Access. World Bank, Washington DC, 2026. |
| [7] | Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility. PPIAF Support to the West African Power Pool. PPIAF, World Bank Group. |
| [8] | West African Power Pool. Regional Electricity Market Code of West Africa. WAPP/EEEOA, Cotonou, Benin. |
| [9] | ECOWAS Regional Electricity Regulatory Authority. Decision No. 020/ERERA/26 Adopting the Regional Transmission Tariff Methodology Applicable to the Regional Electricity Market. ERERA, Accra, Ghana, 2026. |
| [10] | West African Power Pool. BESS Least Cost Investment Plan: Promoting a Climate-Friendly Electricity Market in the ECOWAS Region. WAPP/EEEOA, 2025. |
| [11] | ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency. Regional Electricity Market and Energy Storage Program. ECREEE, Praia, Cabo Verde. |
| [12] | ECOWAS. ECOWAS Energy Policy. Economic Community of West African States, Abuja, Nigeria, 2023. |
| [13] | ECREEE. ECOWAS Renewable Energy Policy. ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, Praia, Cabo Verde, 2013. |
| [14] | International Energy Agency. Senegal 2023: Energy Policy Review. IEA, Paris, 2023. |
| [15] | International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024. IRENA, Abu Dhabi, 2025. |
| [16] | Boiteux, M. Peak-load pricing. The Journal of Business. 1960, 33(2), 157-179. |
| [17] | Schweppe, F. C., Caramanis, M. C., Tabors, R. D., Bohn, R. E. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1988. |
| [18] | Borenstein, S. The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing. The Energy Journal. 2005, 26(3), 93–116. |
| [19] | Faruqui, A., Sergici, S. Household Response to Dynamic Pricing of Electricity: A Survey of 15 Experiments. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 2010, 38(2), 193–225. |
| [20] | Albadi, M. H., El-Saadany, E. F. A Summary of Demand Response in Electricity Markets. Electric Power Systems Research. 2008, 78(11), 1989–1996. |
| [21] | Hart, W. E., Laird, C. D., Watson, J.-P., Woodruff, D. L., Hackebeil, G. A., Nicholson, B. L., Siirola, J. D. Pyomo—Optimization Modeling in Python. 2nd ed. Springer, 2017. |
APA Style
Diassy, D., Mohamed-Yahya, S. M., Faye, J. J., Mohamed-Yahya, A., Samb, M. L. (2026). Regional Coordination of Electricity Pricing, Cross-Border Interconnection and Shared Storage for the West African Power Pool. International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 15(3), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14
ACS Style
Diassy, D.; Mohamed-Yahya, S. M.; Faye, J. J.; Mohamed-Yahya, A.; Samb, M. L. Regional Coordination of Electricity Pricing, Cross-Border Interconnection and Shared Storage for the West African Power Pool. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy 2026, 15(3), 125-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14
AMA Style
Diassy D, Mohamed-Yahya SM, Faye JJ, Mohamed-Yahya A, Samb ML. Regional Coordination of Electricity Pricing, Cross-Border Interconnection and Shared Storage for the West African Power Pool. Int J Sustain Green Energy. 2026;15(3):125-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14,
author = {Dimitry Diassy and Sidi Mohamed Mohamed-Yahya and Jacque Joachim Faye and Ahmed Mohamed-Yahya and Mamadou Lamine Samb},
title = {Regional Coordination of Electricity Pricing, Cross-Border Interconnection and Shared Storage for the West African Power Pool},
journal = {International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy},
volume = {15},
number = {3},
pages = {125-139},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsge.20261503.14},
abstract = {National electricity-planning frameworks are increasingly constrained by their inability to internalise cross-border complementarities in renewable resources, demand profiles and flexibility needs. This paper evaluates whether a regionally coordinated dynamic-pricing mechanism, combined with cross-border interconnection and shared energy storage, can improve the economic and environmental performance of an interconnected power system in West Africa. A multi-period, multi-country optimisation framework is formulated for five ECOWAS member states (Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, The Gambia and Guinea) and applied to three configurations: an isolated national system, a statically priced regional interconnection, and a fully coordinated regional system combining dynamic pricing with shared storage. Because each configuration relaxes the decision space of the previous one, a monotonic cost improvement is expected by construction, so results are read as evidence on the magnitude of that improvement rather than as an independent test of each mechanism. Within this scope, the coordinated configuration reaches, by 2050, an average cost of 45.86 FCFA/kWh and a renewable share of 68.46% without modelled subsidies. A central finding, less directly implied by the scenario structure, is that these gains are not accompanied by larger cross-border flows: exchange volumes fall from roughly 5,000 MWh/day under static interconnection to about 850 MWh/day once shared storage is activated, indicating that temporal flexibility can substitute, in part, for spatial flexibility. Thermal emissions are also lower than under static interconnection, though not comparable to the isolated case owing to differing system boundaries. As the storage and pricing mechanisms have not yet been decomposed and no sensitivity analysis has been run, these results are exploratory rather than confirmatory. With that caveat, they support treating regional electricity pricing as a coordination instrument for interconnection and storage policy, discussed alongside the institutional conditions - harmonised rules, transparent burden-sharing, and consumer protection - required within the WAPP/EEEOA framework.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Regional Coordination of Electricity Pricing, Cross-Border Interconnection and Shared Storage for the West African Power Pool AU - Dimitry Diassy AU - Sidi Mohamed Mohamed-Yahya AU - Jacque Joachim Faye AU - Ahmed Mohamed-Yahya AU - Mamadou Lamine Samb Y1 - 2026/09/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14 T2 - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy JF - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy JO - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy SP - 125 EP - 139 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1549 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsge.20261503.14 AB - National electricity-planning frameworks are increasingly constrained by their inability to internalise cross-border complementarities in renewable resources, demand profiles and flexibility needs. This paper evaluates whether a regionally coordinated dynamic-pricing mechanism, combined with cross-border interconnection and shared energy storage, can improve the economic and environmental performance of an interconnected power system in West Africa. A multi-period, multi-country optimisation framework is formulated for five ECOWAS member states (Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, The Gambia and Guinea) and applied to three configurations: an isolated national system, a statically priced regional interconnection, and a fully coordinated regional system combining dynamic pricing with shared storage. Because each configuration relaxes the decision space of the previous one, a monotonic cost improvement is expected by construction, so results are read as evidence on the magnitude of that improvement rather than as an independent test of each mechanism. Within this scope, the coordinated configuration reaches, by 2050, an average cost of 45.86 FCFA/kWh and a renewable share of 68.46% without modelled subsidies. A central finding, less directly implied by the scenario structure, is that these gains are not accompanied by larger cross-border flows: exchange volumes fall from roughly 5,000 MWh/day under static interconnection to about 850 MWh/day once shared storage is activated, indicating that temporal flexibility can substitute, in part, for spatial flexibility. Thermal emissions are also lower than under static interconnection, though not comparable to the isolated case owing to differing system boundaries. As the storage and pricing mechanisms have not yet been decomposed and no sensitivity analysis has been run, these results are exploratory rather than confirmatory. With that caveat, they support treating regional electricity pricing as a coordination instrument for interconnection and storage policy, discussed alongside the institutional conditions - harmonised rules, transparent burden-sharing, and consumer protection - required within the WAPP/EEEOA framework. VL - 15 IS - 3 ER -