The present investigation was carried out to determine the relationship and genetic variability among 49 tef inbred line using principal component analysis for drought prone areas. To improve tef productivity, farmers need high-yielding and drought tolerant tef cultivars. The objective of this research is to evaluate genetic diversity among drought tolerant tef inbred lines for yield, yield-contributing traits. In this study, Component I had the contribution from the traits viz., days to heading, days to physiological maturity, plant height, panicle length, culm length, number of spikelets per panicle, number of primary panicle branches per main shoot, lodging index, above-ground biomass and harvest index which accounted 40% to the total variability. Grain filling period, number of total tillers per plant, number of fertile tillers per plant, days to mature, peduncle length, number of florets per spikelet and thousand-seed weight has contributed 14% to the total variability in component II. The remaining variability of 13%, 7% and 6% was consolidated in component III, component IV and component V by various traits like days to seedling emergence, culm length, peduncle length, lodging index, above-ground biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, number of total and fertile tillers per plant. The cumulative variance of 79% of total variation among 18 characters was explained by the first five axes. Thus, the results of principal component analysis revealed, wide genetic variability exists in this drought tolerant tef inbred lines. Drought tolerant traits with high genetic variability are expected to provide high level of gene transfer during breeding programs.
Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11 |
Page(s) | 113-118 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tef, PCA, Drought Tolerant, Inbred Lines and Association
[1] | Abdi H., and Williams L. J. 2010. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 433-459. |
[2] | Abraham R. 2015. Achieving food security in Ethiopia by promoting productivity of future world food tef: A review. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research, 2(2): 00045. |
[3] | Alemayehu Muluneh. 2015. Strategies to adapt to climate change in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia: landscape impact. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Netherland. |
[4] | Blum, A. 2011. Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments. Springer, New York, USA. pp. 153-216. |
[5] | Cannarozzi, G., Solomon Chanyalew, Kebebew Assefa, Abate Bekele, Annett Weichert R. B., Klauser D., Plaza-Wu thrich S., Esfeld K., Jost M., Rindisbacher A., Habte Jifar, Johnson-Chadwick V., Ermias Abate, Wang W., Kamies R., Negussu Husein, Worku Kebede, Kidist Tolosa, Yazachew Genet, Kidu Gebremeskel, Brikti Ferede, Firew Mekbib, Federico Martinelli F., Hans Christian Pedersen H. C., Rafudeen S., Shimelis Hussein, Muluneh Tamiru, Nakayama N., Mike Robinson M., Ian Barker I., Samuel Zeeman S. and Zerihun Tadele. 2018. Technology generation to dissemination: lessons learned from the tef improvement project. Euphytica, 214: 31. |
[6] | CSA. 2020. Central Statistical Agency, Agricultural Sample Survey 2019/2020 (2012E. C). Volume I. Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season). Bulletin No. 587 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[7] | Geremew Bultosa, Hall A. N. and Taylor J. R. N. 2002. Physico-chemical characterization of grain tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] starch, Starch-Starke, 54: 461-468. |
[8] | Habtamu Ayalew, Tsige Genet, Tadesse Dessalegn, and Landuber Wondale. 2011. Multivariate diversity, heritability and genetic advance in tef landraces in Ethiopia. African Crop Science Journal, 19: 201-212. |
[9] | Habte Jifar, Kebebew Assefa and Zerihun Tadele. 2015. Grain yield variation and association of major traits in brown-seeded genotypes of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter]. Agriculture and Food Security, 4:7. |
[10] | Holland S. M. 2008. Principal components analysis (PCA). Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-250. |
[11] | Jeffrey, J. 2015. Will Ethiopia's teff be the next 'super grain? BBC, London. |
[12] | Jolliffe, I. T. 2002, Principal Component Analysis, Second Edition springer verlag New York, Inc. ISBN 0-387-95442-2. |
[13] | Kebebew Assefa, J. K. Yu, M. Zeid, Getachew Belay, HailuTefera and Sorrells M. E. 2011. Breeding tef [Eragrostistef (Zucc.) trotter]: conventional and molecular approaches. Plant Breeding, 130: 1-9. |
[14] | Kebebew Assefa, Seyfu Ketema, Hailu Tefera, Nguyen H. T., Blum A. and Mulu Ayele. 1999. Diversity among germplasm lines of the Ethiopian cereal tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Euphytica, 106: 87-97.73. |
[15] | Kebebew Assefa, Seyfu Ketema, Hailu Tefera, Tiruneh Kefyalew and Fufa Hundera. 2000. Trait diversity, heritability and genetic advance in selected germplasm lines of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter]. Hereditas, 133: 29-37. |
[16] | Mary, S. S., and A. Gopalan. 2006. Dissection of Genetic Attributes Yield Traits of Fodder Cowpea in F3 and F4. Journal Applications Sciences Researcher 2 (6): 805–08. |
[17] | Mulu Ayele, Blum A. and Nguyen H. T. 2001. Diversity for osmotic adjustment and root depth in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter]. Euphytica, 121: 237-249. |
[18] | Mulu Ayele. 1993. Use of excised-leaf water content in breeding tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter] for moisture stress areas. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 42: 261-265. |
[19] | Origin Lab. Corporation. 2016. Interpreting Results of Principal Component Analysis. |
[20] | Piccinin, D. 2002. More about Ethiopian food: Tef. University of Washington, USA. http://ethnomed.org/clinical/nutrition/more-about- ethiopian-food-teff. |
[21] | Plaza, S. W., Cannarozzi G. and Zerihun Tadele. 2013. Genetic and phenotypic diversity in selected genotypes of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 1041-1049. |
[22] | Provost, C. and Jobson E. 2014. Move over quinoa, Ethiopian's teff poised to be next big super grain. http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jan/23/quinoa-ethiopia-teff-super-grain. |
[23] | SeyfuKetema. 1997. Tef: [Eragrostistef (Zucc.) Trotter]: Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops12 Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. |
[24] | Spaenij-Dekking, L., Kooy-Winkelaar Y. and Koning F. 2005. The Ethiopian cereal tef in celiac disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353: 1748-1749. |
[25] | Tsion Fikire. 2016. Variability Genetic Diversity of Ethiopian Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) Varieties as Revealed by Morphological and Microsatellite Markers. MSc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[26] | Vavilov, N. I. 1951. The origin, variation, Immunity and Breeding of cultivated plants. Ronald Press, New York. [Translated from Russian by Sarrchester, K]. |
[27] | Yan, W., and M. S. Kang. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. |
[28] | Zerihun Tadele and Kebebew Assefa. 2012. Increasing food production in Africa by boosting the productivity of understudied crops. Agronomy, 2: 240–28. |
APA Style
Worku Kebede, Bulti Tesso. (2021). Principal Component Analysis of Early Generation Drought Tolerant Tef Genotypes for Yield-contributing Traits. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 9(3), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11
ACS Style
Worku Kebede; Bulti Tesso. Principal Component Analysis of Early Generation Drought Tolerant Tef Genotypes for Yield-contributing Traits. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2021, 9(3), 113-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11
AMA Style
Worku Kebede, Bulti Tesso. Principal Component Analysis of Early Generation Drought Tolerant Tef Genotypes for Yield-contributing Traits. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2021;9(3):113-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11, author = {Worku Kebede and Bulti Tesso}, title = {Principal Component Analysis of Early Generation Drought Tolerant Tef Genotypes for Yield-contributing Traits}, journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {113-118}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20211003.11}, abstract = {The present investigation was carried out to determine the relationship and genetic variability among 49 tef inbred line using principal component analysis for drought prone areas. To improve tef productivity, farmers need high-yielding and drought tolerant tef cultivars. The objective of this research is to evaluate genetic diversity among drought tolerant tef inbred lines for yield, yield-contributing traits. In this study, Component I had the contribution from the traits viz., days to heading, days to physiological maturity, plant height, panicle length, culm length, number of spikelets per panicle, number of primary panicle branches per main shoot, lodging index, above-ground biomass and harvest index which accounted 40% to the total variability. Grain filling period, number of total tillers per plant, number of fertile tillers per plant, days to mature, peduncle length, number of florets per spikelet and thousand-seed weight has contributed 14% to the total variability in component II. The remaining variability of 13%, 7% and 6% was consolidated in component III, component IV and component V by various traits like days to seedling emergence, culm length, peduncle length, lodging index, above-ground biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, number of total and fertile tillers per plant. The cumulative variance of 79% of total variation among 18 characters was explained by the first five axes. Thus, the results of principal component analysis revealed, wide genetic variability exists in this drought tolerant tef inbred lines. Drought tolerant traits with high genetic variability are expected to provide high level of gene transfer during breeding programs.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Principal Component Analysis of Early Generation Drought Tolerant Tef Genotypes for Yield-contributing Traits AU - Worku Kebede AU - Bulti Tesso Y1 - 2021/06/03 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 113 EP - 118 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.11 AB - The present investigation was carried out to determine the relationship and genetic variability among 49 tef inbred line using principal component analysis for drought prone areas. To improve tef productivity, farmers need high-yielding and drought tolerant tef cultivars. The objective of this research is to evaluate genetic diversity among drought tolerant tef inbred lines for yield, yield-contributing traits. In this study, Component I had the contribution from the traits viz., days to heading, days to physiological maturity, plant height, panicle length, culm length, number of spikelets per panicle, number of primary panicle branches per main shoot, lodging index, above-ground biomass and harvest index which accounted 40% to the total variability. Grain filling period, number of total tillers per plant, number of fertile tillers per plant, days to mature, peduncle length, number of florets per spikelet and thousand-seed weight has contributed 14% to the total variability in component II. The remaining variability of 13%, 7% and 6% was consolidated in component III, component IV and component V by various traits like days to seedling emergence, culm length, peduncle length, lodging index, above-ground biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, number of total and fertile tillers per plant. The cumulative variance of 79% of total variation among 18 characters was explained by the first five axes. Thus, the results of principal component analysis revealed, wide genetic variability exists in this drought tolerant tef inbred lines. Drought tolerant traits with high genetic variability are expected to provide high level of gene transfer during breeding programs. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -