This study was conducted to characterize and evaluate food quality of released food barley varieties through physical, chemical and sensory evaluation. Fifteen released food barley varieties were collected from different research centers. Physicochemical qualities of these varieties were analyzed with three replications. Sensory evaluation was also performed by using hedonic scale method. Hectoliter weight, thousand kernel weight, moisture, protein, sodium, potassium, iron, zinc, calcium and magnesium contents were determined in the range of 55.57 – 66.67 grams, 33.50 – 58.50 grams, 7.46 – 11.43%, 9.44 – 16.80%, 79.23 – 316.54 ppm, 3993 – 6040 ppm, 11.49 – 64.32 ppm, 31.07 – 55.73 ppm, 305.42 – 716.91 ppm and 811.50 – 1731.10 ppm respectively. Overall acceptability of porridge prepared from barley varieties were disliked slightly to liked moderately while liked slightly to liked moderately for Injera. There were significant (P<0.05) variation in physical, chemical and organoleptic properties due to test barley varieties variation. Aruso variety was the highest in mean value of thousand kernel weight and hectoliter weight. Walker variety had the highest protein mean score. The study revealed that Robera, Abdane, Bentu, Harbu, Golden Eye and Walker varieties had the highest value of calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, iron and zinc respectively. Walker variety porridge was disliked slightly and Bentu variety was mostly liked moderately but not significantly different among Aquila, Gobe, HB 1966 and Robera varieties. Abdane variety injera was liked slightly and Biftu variety was mostly liked moderately but not significantly different among nine barley varieties. Therefore Aruso, Biftu, Bentu and Robera varieties were preferred for physical, chemical and sensory quality attributes.
| Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13 |
| Page(s) | 127-134 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Food Barley, Variety, Physical, Chemical, Sensory, Injera, Porridge
| [1] | Fischbeck, G. 2002. “Contribution of barley to agriculture: A brief overview”, in G. A. Slafer, J. L. |
| [2] | Bekele, B., Makkouk, K. M., Yusuf, A., Alemayu, F., Lencho, A. 2001. Occurrence and distribution of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) isolates in central Ethiopia. Inter. J. Pest. Mande. t, 47. pp 115-119. |
| [3] | Jemal M., Semeneh S., 2016. Revisit to Ethiopian traditional barley-based food. Journal of Ethnic Foods. J Ethn Foods 3 (2016) 135e141. |
| [4] | James Warner Tim Stehulak Leulsegged Kasa, 2013. Woreda-Level Crop Production Rankings in Ethiopia: A Pooled Data Approach. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia |
| [5] | The federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. Central statistical agency agricultural sample survey 2017/18 volume I report on area and production of major crops |
| [6] | Ministry of Agriculture. Plant variety release, protection and seed quality control directorate. Crop variety register issue No. 21. June, 2018. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia |
| [7] | Metayer J. P., Grosjean F., Castaing J. Study of variability in French cereals. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 1993. 43(1-2). P. 87–108. |
| [8] | Rodehutscord M., Ruckert C., Maurer H. P., Schenkel H., Schipprack W., Knudsen K. E. B., Schollenberger M., Laux M., Eklund M., Siegert W., Mosenthin R. Variation in chemical composition and physical characteristics of cereal grains from different genotypes. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2016. 70(2). P. 87–107. |
| [9] | Jilal, A 2011, 'Assessment of genetically diverse international barley germplasm for development of food product applications', PhD thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. |
| [10] | Yadesa Abeshu, Esayas Abrha. Evaluation of Proximate and Mineral Composition Profile for Different Food Barley Varieties Grown in Central Highlands of Ethiopia. World Journal of Food Science and Technology. Vol. 1, No. 3, 2017, pp. 97-100. |
| [11] | Izydorczyk MS, Storsley J, Labossiere D, MacGregor A. W, Rossnagel BG (2000) Variation in total and soluble b-glucan content in hulless barley: effects of thermal, physical, and enzymic treatments. J of Agric and Food Chem 48:982–989. |
| [12] | Karababa Ersan (2005). Physical properties of popcorn kernels. Journal of Food Engineering. WWW.elsevier.Com/locate/jfoodeng.1-8. |
| [13] | AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2000. Official methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th edition, Vol. II. Washington, DC, USA |
| [14] | AOAC Official Method 975.03. Metals in Plants and Pet Foods. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometric Method. First Action 1975 and Final Action 1988. |
| [15] | Bultosa, G., & Taylor, J. R. (2004). Paste and gel properties and in vitro digestibility of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] starch. Starch-Stärke, 56 (1), 20–28. doi:10.1002/star.200200191 |
| [16] | Fitsum Woldemariam, Ali Mohammed, Tadesse Fikre and Hailay Gebremedhin, 2019. Optimization of amaranths–teff–barley flour blending ratios for better nutritional and sensory acceptability of Injera. Cogent Food & Agriculture (2019), 5: 1565079. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1565079 |
| [17] | İlker E, Altınbaş M, Tosun M (2009) Selection for test weight and kernel weight in high yielding wheat using a safety-fi rst index. Turk J Agric For 33: 37-45. |
| [18] | Ullrich, S. E., Clancy, J. A., Eslick, R. F., and Lance, R. C. M. (1986). Beta-glucan content and viscosity of waxy barley. J. Cereal Sci, 4: 279 - 285. |
| [19] | Qi, J. C., Zhang, G. P., Zhou, M. X. (2006). Protein and hordein content in barley seeds as affected by nitrogen level and their relationship to beta-amylase activity. J. Cereal Sci., 43, 102–107. |
| [20] | Arendt, E. K., Zannini, E. (2013). Cereal Grains for the Food and Beverage Industries. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge. 485. |
| [21] | Izydorczyk., M. S., Storsley., J; Labossiere., D; Mac-Gregor., A. W; Rossnagel., B. G. (2000). Variation in total and soluble b-glucan content in hulless barley: Effects of thermal, physical and enzymic treatments. J. Agric. Food Chem, 48: 982–989. |
| [22] | Quinde-Axtell, Z., Powers, P., and Baik, B. K., (2006). Retardation of discolouration in barley flour gel and dough. Cereal Chemistry, 83: 385-390. |
| [23] | EHNRI [Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute]. 1997. Food composition table for use in Ethiopia 1968–1997. Part III. EHNRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [24] | Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of Barley (hordeum vulgare l.): key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients (2004). Env/jm/mono (2004)20 |
| [25] | Welch, R. W., (1978). Genotypic variation in oil and protein in barley grain. J. Sci. Fd. Agric, 29: 953-958. |
| [26] | Bhatty, R. S., and Rossnagel, B. G. (1980). Lipids and fatty acid composition of Riso 1508 and normal barley. Cereal Chem, 57 (6): 382-386. |
| [27] | Kent, N. L., and Evers, A. D. (1994). Technology of Cereals, 4th ed. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford. |
| [28] | Duffus, C. M., and Cochrane, M. P. (1993). “Formation of the barley grain - Morphology, physiology and biochemistry”, in A. W. MacGregor and R. S. Bhatty (eds.), Barley: Chemistry and technology, AACC, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, pp. 31 - 72. |
| [29] | Stone, H and Sidel, JL. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices. 2nd ed. Academic Press: San Diego. |
| [30] | Baik, B. K., Quinde, Z., and Ullrich, S. E. (2005). Improvement of barley-based food product colour. Proceedings of the 18th Triennial North American Barley Researchers Workshop and 4th Canadian Barley Symposium. |
| [31] | Yetneberk, S., H. L. deKock, L. W. Rooney, and J. R. N. Taylor. 2004. Effects of sorghum cultivar on Injera quality. Cereal Chem. 8: 314–321. doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2004.81.3.314 |
| [32] | Zegeye, A. 1997. Acceptability of injera with stewed chicken. Food Qual. Prefer. 8:293–295. doi: 10.1016/S0950- 3293(96)00055-9 |
APA Style
Megersa Daba, Abiyot Lelisa. (2021). Evaluation of Food Quality of Released Barley Varieties Grown in Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 9(3), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13
ACS Style
Megersa Daba; Abiyot Lelisa. Evaluation of Food Quality of Released Barley Varieties Grown in Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2021, 9(3), 127-134. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13
AMA Style
Megersa Daba, Abiyot Lelisa. Evaluation of Food Quality of Released Barley Varieties Grown in Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2021;9(3):127-134. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13,
author = {Megersa Daba and Abiyot Lelisa},
title = {Evaluation of Food Quality of Released Barley Varieties Grown in Oromia, Ethiopia},
journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
pages = {127-134},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20211003.13},
abstract = {This study was conducted to characterize and evaluate food quality of released food barley varieties through physical, chemical and sensory evaluation. Fifteen released food barley varieties were collected from different research centers. Physicochemical qualities of these varieties were analyzed with three replications. Sensory evaluation was also performed by using hedonic scale method. Hectoliter weight, thousand kernel weight, moisture, protein, sodium, potassium, iron, zinc, calcium and magnesium contents were determined in the range of 55.57 – 66.67 grams, 33.50 – 58.50 grams, 7.46 – 11.43%, 9.44 – 16.80%, 79.23 – 316.54 ppm, 3993 – 6040 ppm, 11.49 – 64.32 ppm, 31.07 – 55.73 ppm, 305.42 – 716.91 ppm and 811.50 – 1731.10 ppm respectively. Overall acceptability of porridge prepared from barley varieties were disliked slightly to liked moderately while liked slightly to liked moderately for Injera. There were significant (P<0.05) variation in physical, chemical and organoleptic properties due to test barley varieties variation. Aruso variety was the highest in mean value of thousand kernel weight and hectoliter weight. Walker variety had the highest protein mean score. The study revealed that Robera, Abdane, Bentu, Harbu, Golden Eye and Walker varieties had the highest value of calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, iron and zinc respectively. Walker variety porridge was disliked slightly and Bentu variety was mostly liked moderately but not significantly different among Aquila, Gobe, HB 1966 and Robera varieties. Abdane variety injera was liked slightly and Biftu variety was mostly liked moderately but not significantly different among nine barley varieties. Therefore Aruso, Biftu, Bentu and Robera varieties were preferred for physical, chemical and sensory quality attributes.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Food Quality of Released Barley Varieties Grown in Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Megersa Daba AU - Abiyot Lelisa Y1 - 2021/06/08 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 127 EP - 134 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20211003.13 AB - This study was conducted to characterize and evaluate food quality of released food barley varieties through physical, chemical and sensory evaluation. Fifteen released food barley varieties were collected from different research centers. Physicochemical qualities of these varieties were analyzed with three replications. Sensory evaluation was also performed by using hedonic scale method. Hectoliter weight, thousand kernel weight, moisture, protein, sodium, potassium, iron, zinc, calcium and magnesium contents were determined in the range of 55.57 – 66.67 grams, 33.50 – 58.50 grams, 7.46 – 11.43%, 9.44 – 16.80%, 79.23 – 316.54 ppm, 3993 – 6040 ppm, 11.49 – 64.32 ppm, 31.07 – 55.73 ppm, 305.42 – 716.91 ppm and 811.50 – 1731.10 ppm respectively. Overall acceptability of porridge prepared from barley varieties were disliked slightly to liked moderately while liked slightly to liked moderately for Injera. There were significant (P<0.05) variation in physical, chemical and organoleptic properties due to test barley varieties variation. Aruso variety was the highest in mean value of thousand kernel weight and hectoliter weight. Walker variety had the highest protein mean score. The study revealed that Robera, Abdane, Bentu, Harbu, Golden Eye and Walker varieties had the highest value of calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, iron and zinc respectively. Walker variety porridge was disliked slightly and Bentu variety was mostly liked moderately but not significantly different among Aquila, Gobe, HB 1966 and Robera varieties. Abdane variety injera was liked slightly and Biftu variety was mostly liked moderately but not significantly different among nine barley varieties. Therefore Aruso, Biftu, Bentu and Robera varieties were preferred for physical, chemical and sensory quality attributes. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: