This article analyzes how in some examples of rural indigenous communities in the south of Mexico a way of life based on community Ethics is carried out, a type of Ethics that with the practice of collective values such as mutual support, solidarity, respect, inclusion, community and cooperative work. From this collective vision of life derives practices such as direct council’s democracy, which is developed by distributing power and political responsibility among the different members of the community in this way it and the collective council are the highest authority. The councils are formed by members of the community with rotating positions. At the same time, the direct participation of the inhabitants of the community has a direct impact on decision making. This political participation allows not only the exercise of direct council democracy but also a mechanism of inclusion and the intention of respect for Plurality, since the different members of the community can participate in the council or have a responsibility in the committee, this without gender restrictions since the participation of women is very important in certain examples and in other cases the participation of a third gender is also included; thus exercising through community Ethics the respect for the other, as well as the recognition of the difference, identity and plurality. The construction of an ecological awareness through the care and defense of the environment is also developed from the practice of community ethics, because if we think in community we have to opt for the welfare of all, which implies taking care of natural resources in a responsible manner for collective subsistence, in addition to respect for plurality and beliefs that relate to nature as a cultural and religious issue that is part of the identity of the community. Thinking that allows the development of practices for the care of the environment.
Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15 |
Page(s) | 121-129 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Community Ethics, Direct-Democracy, Plurality, Ecology
[1] | Aboites Aguilar Luis. (2014). “El último tramo”, en Escalante Gonzalbo Pablo. (Compilador). Historia mínima de México. ("The last stretch", in Minimal history of Mexico). México: COLMEX. |
[2] | Araiza Díaz Alejandra. (2003). “Vida cotidiana de las mujeres zapatistas de Roberto Barrios”, en revista Cuicuilco, (“Daily life of the Zapatista women of Roberto Barrios”, in Cuicuilco Journal), vol. 10, núm. 27, enero-abril. |
[3] | Arendt Hannah. (1990). On Revolution. United States of America: Penguin Books. |
[4] | Arriarán Cuellar Samuel. (2001). Multiculturalismo y globalización: la cuestión indígena. (Multiculturalism and globalization: the indigenous issue). México: UPN. |
[5] | Bulmer Eliot. (2021). Democracia directa. Guía introductoria 3 para la elaboración constitucional. (Direct democracy. Introductory guide 3 for constitutional drafting). Estocolmo: Instituto Internacional para la Democracia y la Asistencia Electoral. |
[6] | Cadena Durán O, Lozano Botache J. (2013). “El sentido de lo comunitario: tensiones entre el liberalismo y comunitarismo en territorios locales del Cauca, Colombia”, en Revista Lebret, (The sense of the community: tensions between liberalism and communitarianism in local territories of Cauca, Colombia”, in Journal Lebret), Número 5, pp. 71-86. |
[7] | Cadet Odimba Jean. (2017). “La mujer indígena y su derecho a la participación política en México”, en Revista Prolegómenos-Derechos y Valores, (“Indigenous women and their right to political participation in Mexico”, in Journal Prolegómenos-Derechos y Valores), número 40, julio-diciembre, pp. 145-158. |
[8] | Coca Juan, López Graciela. (2016). “Reflexiones sobre pluralismo político y educación intercultural en las sociedades democráticas contemporáneas”, en Aposta revista de Ciencias Sociales, ("Reflections on political pluralism and intercultural education in contemporary democratic societies", in Aposta Journal of Social Sciences), N° 70 agosto-diciembre. |
[9] | Cortés Rodas Francisco. (1997). “Liberalismo, comunitarismo y ética comunicativa”, en Daímon Revista de Filosofía, ("Liberalism, Communitarianism and Communicative Ethics," in Daímon Journal of Philosophy), n° 15, pp. 93-106. |
[10] | Cortina Adela. (2013) ¿Para qué sirve realmente la Ética? (What is Ethics really for?). Barcelona: Paidós. |
[11] | Debo Armenta Daniel Alfonso. (2021). “Activismo digital Indígena por la defensa del agua. Revisión de casos en Facebook”, en revista Argumentos ("Indigenous digital activism for the defense of water. Review of cases on Facebook", in Argumentos Journal), 34, N° 95, enero-abril. |
[12] | Dussel Enrique. (2016). Ética comunitaria. (Community ethics). Caracas: El perro y la rana. |
[13] | Galindo Lara Claudia. (2005). “Democracia directa o representación” en Revista Caleidoscopio ("Direct democracy or representation" in Kaleidoscope Journal). Núm. 18, julio-diciembre. |
[14] | Gasparello Giovanna. (2016). “Entre la montaña y Wirikuta. Defensa del territorio y patrimonio cultural y natural de los pueblos indígenas”, en Argumentos, (“Between the mountain and Wirikuta. Defense of the territory and cultural and natural heritage of indigenous peoples”, in Arguments Journal), vol. 29, N° 81, mayo-agosto, pp. 221-239. |
[15] | González Ordoñez Andreina. (2008). “Ética y valores en la participación y organización comunitaria como bases de la estrategia gerencial para el desarrollo local sostenible”, en Revista Multiciencias, ("Ethics and values in community participation and organization as the basis of the management strategy for sustainable local development", in Journal Multiciencias), vol. 8, número 2, pp. 205-212. |
[16] | Janacua Benites Jesús. (2017). “Pensar la comunidad desde la modernidad en Luis Villoro”, en n Revista de Filosofía y Letras Sincronía. (“Thinking about the community from modernity in Luis Villoro”, in Journal of Philosophy and Letters Synchrony). Año XXI. Número 71, enero-junio, pp. 92-102. |
[17] | Jiménez Naranjo Yolanda, Sánchez Antonio Juan. (2020). “Pluralismo epistémico, alteridad, comunidad y escuela: una relación a discutir”, en Revista De Prácticas y Discursos, (“Epistemic pluralism, alterity, community and school: a relationship to discuss”, in Journal of Practices and Speeches), año 9, número 13, marzo. |
[18] | Jiménez Ottalengo Regina. (2000). “El comunitarismo en los pueblos indígenas de México”, en revista Arbor (“Communitarianism in the indigenous peoples of Mexico”, in Arbor Journal), CLXV, 652, abril, pp. 747-757. |
[19] | Juárez Rodrigo. (2010). “El concepto de ciudadanía en el comunitarismo”, en Cuestiones Constitucionales Revista mexicana de derecho constitucional, ("The concept of citizenship in communitarianism", in Constitutional Issues Mexican Journal of constitutional law), núm. 23, julio-diciembre, pp. 153-174. |
[20] | Leff Enrique. (2017). “Las relaciones de poder del conocimiento en el campo de la ecología política”, en Revista Ambiente y Sociedad. ("The power relations of knowledge in the field of political ecology," in Environment and Society Journal). V. XX, n° 3, Sao Paulo, jul-sept, pp. 229-262. |
[21] | Meza Salcedo Guillermo. (2017). “Ética de la investigación desde el pensamiento indígena: derechos colectivos y el principio de la comunalidad”, en revista de Bioética y Derecho, ("Research ethics from indigenous thought: collective rights and the principle of communality," in Journal of Bioethics and Law). 41, pp. 141-159. |
[22] | Millán Margara. (2006). Participación política de mujeres indígenas en América Latina: El movimiento zapatista en México. (Political participation of indigenous women in Latin America: The Zapatista movement in Mexico). Santo Domingo: Instituto Internacional de Investigación y Capacitación de las Naciones Unidas para la promoción de la Mujer. |
[23] | Ortega Esquivel Aureliano. (2019). Ensayos sobre marxismo crítico en México. (Revueltas, Sánchez Vázquez, Echeverría). [Essays on critical Marxism in Mexico (Revueltas, Sánchez Vázquez, Echeverría)]. México: UNAM/Itaca. |
[24] | Orrego Bayron. (2019). “Democracia comunitaria y configuración de apuestas políticas de gobiernos indígenas en Latinoamérica”, en Revista Ciencia Política. ("Community democracy and configuration of political bets of indigenous governments in Latin America", in Political Science Journal), 14 (27), pp. 227-249. |
[25] | Pereyra Carlos. (2012). Sobre la democracia. (About democracy). México: Cal y Arena. |
[26] | Rachels James. (2006). Introducción a la filosofía moral. (Introduction to moral philosophy). México: FCE. |
[27] | Rangel González Raúl. (2018). Democracia indígena en contextos multiculturales. (Indigenous Democracy in Multicultural Contexts). México: Instituto Electoral del Estado de México. |
[28] | Rojas Álvarez Lourdes. (2011). Iniciación al griego I: Método teórico-práctico. (Introduction to Greek I: Theoretical-Practical Method). México: UNAM. |
[29] | Rozas O. German. (2003). “Aproximación Psico comunitario ambiental al problema de calentamiento global”, en Revista de Psicología, ("Psycho-community environmental approach to the problem of global warming," in Journal of Psychology), vol. XII, núm. 2, pp. 19-34. |
[30] | Sartori Giovanni. (2001). La sociedad multiétnica. Pluralismo, multiculturalismo, extranjeros e islámicos. (The multi-ethnic society. Pluralism, multiculturalism, foreigners and Islamic). Madrid: Santillana. |
[31] | Urbiola Solís Alejandra Elizabeth. (2017). “Expresión y trabajo de los Muxe’ del Istmo de Tehuantepec, en Juchitán de Zaragoza”, en revista Nova Scientia, ("Expression and work of the Muxe' of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, in Juchitán de Zaragoza", in Nova Scientia Journal), vol. 9, núm. 19, pp. 505-527. |
[32] | Urrego Tovar Ángela María. (2014). “La pluralidad: Rasgo de la subjetividad política y condición para construir el sentido de “entre-nos””, en Revista Pedagogía y Saberes, ("Plurality: Feature of political subjectivity and condition to build the sense of between-us”, in Pedagogy and Knowledge Journal). N° 40. Colombia: UPN. |
[33] | Vargas Hernández José G. (2006). “Nuevos movimientos sociales ambientales en México”, en revista venezolana de Ciencias Sociales, ("New environmental social movements in Mexico", in Venezuelan journal of Social Sciences), vol. 10, N° I, enero-junio. |
[34] | Velázquez Galindo Cruz. (2015). “Derecho al medio ambiente y pueblos indígenas en México. Análisis del artículo 7 en el marco del Convenio 169 de la OIT”, en revista Alegatos, (“Right to the environment and indigenous peoples in Mexico. Analysis of article 7 in the framework of ILO Convention 169”, in Alegatos Journal), núm. 90, México, mayo/agosto. |
[35] | Ventura Patiño María del Carmen, Villagómez Velázquez Yanga. (2013). “Territorio y medio ambiente. Derechos negados a los pueblos indígenas en México”, en Revista Legislativa de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública, (“Territory and environment. Rights denied to indigenous peoples in Mexico”, in Legislative Journal of Social Studies and Public Opinion), vol. 6, núm. 11, ene-jun, pp. 187-209. |
[36] | Woldenberg José. (2016). “Luis Villoro: poder, democracia, multiculturalismo”, en Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales ("Luis Villoro: power, democracy, multiculturalism", in the Mexican Journal of Political and Social Sciences), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Nueva Época, Año LXI, núm. 227 mayo-agosto, pp. 409-416. |
APA Style
David Valerio Miranda. (2022). Community Ethics as a Possibility to Develop Direct-Council Democracy, Plurality and Ecological Awareness in Rural and Indigenous Communities in Mexico. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 10(3), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15
ACS Style
David Valerio Miranda. Community Ethics as a Possibility to Develop Direct-Council Democracy, Plurality and Ecological Awareness in Rural and Indigenous Communities in Mexico. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2022, 10(3), 121-129. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15
AMA Style
David Valerio Miranda. Community Ethics as a Possibility to Develop Direct-Council Democracy, Plurality and Ecological Awareness in Rural and Indigenous Communities in Mexico. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2022;10(3):121-129. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15, author = {David Valerio Miranda}, title = {Community Ethics as a Possibility to Develop Direct-Council Democracy, Plurality and Ecological Awareness in Rural and Indigenous Communities in Mexico}, journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {121-129}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20221003.15}, abstract = {This article analyzes how in some examples of rural indigenous communities in the south of Mexico a way of life based on community Ethics is carried out, a type of Ethics that with the practice of collective values such as mutual support, solidarity, respect, inclusion, community and cooperative work. From this collective vision of life derives practices such as direct council’s democracy, which is developed by distributing power and political responsibility among the different members of the community in this way it and the collective council are the highest authority. The councils are formed by members of the community with rotating positions. At the same time, the direct participation of the inhabitants of the community has a direct impact on decision making. This political participation allows not only the exercise of direct council democracy but also a mechanism of inclusion and the intention of respect for Plurality, since the different members of the community can participate in the council or have a responsibility in the committee, this without gender restrictions since the participation of women is very important in certain examples and in other cases the participation of a third gender is also included; thus exercising through community Ethics the respect for the other, as well as the recognition of the difference, identity and plurality. The construction of an ecological awareness through the care and defense of the environment is also developed from the practice of community ethics, because if we think in community we have to opt for the welfare of all, which implies taking care of natural resources in a responsible manner for collective subsistence, in addition to respect for plurality and beliefs that relate to nature as a cultural and religious issue that is part of the identity of the community. Thinking that allows the development of practices for the care of the environment.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Community Ethics as a Possibility to Develop Direct-Council Democracy, Plurality and Ecological Awareness in Rural and Indigenous Communities in Mexico AU - David Valerio Miranda Y1 - 2022/06/27 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 121 EP - 129 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.15 AB - This article analyzes how in some examples of rural indigenous communities in the south of Mexico a way of life based on community Ethics is carried out, a type of Ethics that with the practice of collective values such as mutual support, solidarity, respect, inclusion, community and cooperative work. From this collective vision of life derives practices such as direct council’s democracy, which is developed by distributing power and political responsibility among the different members of the community in this way it and the collective council are the highest authority. The councils are formed by members of the community with rotating positions. At the same time, the direct participation of the inhabitants of the community has a direct impact on decision making. This political participation allows not only the exercise of direct council democracy but also a mechanism of inclusion and the intention of respect for Plurality, since the different members of the community can participate in the council or have a responsibility in the committee, this without gender restrictions since the participation of women is very important in certain examples and in other cases the participation of a third gender is also included; thus exercising through community Ethics the respect for the other, as well as the recognition of the difference, identity and plurality. The construction of an ecological awareness through the care and defense of the environment is also developed from the practice of community ethics, because if we think in community we have to opt for the welfare of all, which implies taking care of natural resources in a responsible manner for collective subsistence, in addition to respect for plurality and beliefs that relate to nature as a cultural and religious issue that is part of the identity of the community. Thinking that allows the development of practices for the care of the environment. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -