Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion

Wang Zizhao; Gong Maosheng; Wang Kunyang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

| Peer-Reviewed

Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion

Wang Zizhao, Gong Maosheng, Wang Kunyang

Published in Science Discovery (Volume 10, Issue 3)

Received: 31 May 2022 Accepted: Published: 1 June 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In order to compare the difference of seismic response of RC frame structure under single and bidirectional strong ground motions, a 3-story RC frame structure is designed according to the Chinese seismic design code, and the structural seismic response is analyzed under the excitation of 4 sets of bidirectional strong ground motions by using OpenSEES. Then the seismic response parameters are analyzed and compared between the excitation of single and bidirectional strong ground motions. The result shows that the structural inter-story drift ratio under bidirectional strong ground motion is larger than that of excitation of the single component of strong motion and the column concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain increase, while the beam concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain decrease. The plastic hinge of RC frame is more likely to be formed at the end of column, and the amount of plastic hinge at column ends increases, but decreases at beam ends respectively, compared with excitation of single component of strong motion. Moreover, it is found that different bidirectional seismic input modes have large influence on the inter-story drift ratio and fiber strain, while have small influence on axial compression ratio and failure mode of beam-column joints. The result provides some reference for the seismic design of RC frame considering the effect of the bidirectional seismic action.

Published in	Science Discovery (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
Page(s)	146-152
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Structural Nonlinear Analysis, RC Frame Structure, Bidirectional Seismic Action, Plastic Hinge

References

[1]	李英民,赖明.工程地震动模型化研究综述及展望(Ⅰ)──概述与地震学模型[J].重庆建筑大学学报, 1998 (02): 73-80。
[2]	曲博闻.水平双向加载下钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能研究[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2018。
[3]	叶列平,曲哲,马千里,林旭川,陆新征,潘鹏.从汶川地震框架结构震害谈“强柱弱梁”屈服机制的实现[J].建筑结构, 2008 (11): 52-59+67。
[4]	杨红,王建辉,白绍良.双向地震作用对框架柱端弯矩增大系数的影响分析[J].土木工程学报, 2008 (09): 40-47。
[5]	邱法维,李文峰,潘鹏,钱稼茹.钢筋混凝土柱的双向拟静力实验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2001 (05): 26-31。
[6]	张望喜,王雄,张瑾熠,史佳佳,卫永涛.带现浇楼板RC框架结构抗震性能的多因素影响分析[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2018, 38 (01): 77-88。
[7]	Seki M, Okada T. Nonlinear earthquake response test of torsionally coupled reinforced concrete buildings frames [J]. Proceedings of the 8th World Conference, Earthq. Eng. 1984, 6: 315-322.
[8]	Okada T, Seki M, Park Y J. A simulation of earthquake response of reinforced concrete building frames to bidirectional ground motion by IIS computer-actuator on-line system [C]. Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey. 1980: 8-13.
[9]	张昊宇,曲博闻,毛晨曦.水平双向加载下钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报, 2019, 52 (08): 49-61+71。
[10]	付青青.双向地震作用下SRC框架结构抗震性能分析[D].河北工程大学, 2020。
[11]	李忠献,尉迪,高营.不同加载路径下RC短柱抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构, 2018, 48 (02): 55-59+71。
[12]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.GB50011-2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2010。
[13]	Scott B D, Park R, Priestley M J N. Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates [J]. ACI Journal, 1982, 79 (01): 13-27.
[14]	Spacone E, Filippou F C, Taucer F F. Fiber beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: part 1. Formulation [J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1996, 25 (07): 711-725.
[15]	杨红,朱振华,白绍良.双向地震作用下我国“强柱弱梁”措施的有效性评估[J].土木工程学报, 2011, 44 (01): 58-64。
[16]	董银峰,梁文举,姚鹤彬,何铠岐.双向地震动输入方法对结构时程分析反应的影响[J].建筑结构学报, 2018, 39 (S1): 168-174。
[17]	杨溥,李英民,赖明.结构时程分析法输入地震波的选择控制指标[J].土木工程学报, 2000 (06): 33-37。

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wang Zizhao, Gong Maosheng, Wang Kunyang. (2022). Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion. Science Discovery, 10(3), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wang Zizhao; Gong Maosheng; Wang Kunyang. Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion. Sci. Discov. 2022, 10(3), 146-152. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wang Zizhao, Gong Maosheng, Wang Kunyang. Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion. Sci Discov. 2022;10(3):146-152. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21,
  author = {Wang Zizhao and Gong Maosheng and Wang Kunyang},
  title = {Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion},
  journal = {Science Discovery},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {146-152},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20221003.21},
  abstract = {In order to compare the difference of seismic response of RC frame structure under single and bidirectional strong ground motions, a 3-story RC frame structure is designed according to the Chinese seismic design code, and the structural seismic response is analyzed under the excitation of 4 sets of bidirectional strong ground motions by using OpenSEES. Then the seismic response parameters are analyzed and compared between the excitation of single and bidirectional strong ground motions. The result shows that the structural inter-story drift ratio under bidirectional strong ground motion is larger than that of excitation of the single component of strong motion and the column concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain increase, while the beam concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain decrease. The plastic hinge of RC frame is more likely to be formed at the end of column, and the amount of plastic hinge at column ends increases, but decreases at beam ends respectively, compared with excitation of single component of strong motion. Moreover, it is found that different bidirectional seismic input modes have large influence on the inter-story drift ratio and fiber strain, while have small influence on axial compression ratio and failure mode of beam-column joints. The result provides some reference for the seismic design of RC frame considering the effect of the bidirectional seismic action.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion
AU  - Wang Zizhao
AU  - Gong Maosheng
AU  - Wang Kunyang
Y1  - 2022/06/01
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
T2  - Science Discovery
JF  - Science Discovery
JO  - Science Discovery
SP  - 146
EP  - 152
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0650
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
AB  - In order to compare the difference of seismic response of RC frame structure under single and bidirectional strong ground motions, a 3-story RC frame structure is designed according to the Chinese seismic design code, and the structural seismic response is analyzed under the excitation of 4 sets of bidirectional strong ground motions by using OpenSEES. Then the seismic response parameters are analyzed and compared between the excitation of single and bidirectional strong ground motions. The result shows that the structural inter-story drift ratio under bidirectional strong ground motion is larger than that of excitation of the single component of strong motion and the column concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain increase, while the beam concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain decrease. The plastic hinge of RC frame is more likely to be formed at the end of column, and the amount of plastic hinge at column ends increases, but decreases at beam ends respectively, compared with excitation of single component of strong motion. Moreover, it is found that different bidirectional seismic input modes have large influence on the inter-story drift ratio and fiber strain, while have small influence on axial compression ratio and failure mode of beam-column joints. The result provides some reference for the seismic design of RC frame considering the effect of the bidirectional seismic action.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wang Zizhao

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China
Gong Maosheng

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China
Wang Kunyang

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wang Zizhao, Gong Maosheng, Wang Kunyang. (2022). Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion. Science Discovery, 10(3), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wang Zizhao; Gong Maosheng; Wang Kunyang. Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion. Sci. Discov. 2022, 10(3), 146-152. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wang Zizhao, Gong Maosheng, Wang Kunyang. Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion. Sci Discov. 2022;10(3):146-152. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21,
  author = {Wang Zizhao and Gong Maosheng and Wang Kunyang},
  title = {Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion},
  journal = {Science Discovery},
  volume = {10},
  number = {3},
  pages = {146-152},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20221003.21},
  abstract = {In order to compare the difference of seismic response of RC frame structure under single and bidirectional strong ground motions, a 3-story RC frame structure is designed according to the Chinese seismic design code, and the structural seismic response is analyzed under the excitation of 4 sets of bidirectional strong ground motions by using OpenSEES. Then the seismic response parameters are analyzed and compared between the excitation of single and bidirectional strong ground motions. The result shows that the structural inter-story drift ratio under bidirectional strong ground motion is larger than that of excitation of the single component of strong motion and the column concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain increase, while the beam concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain decrease. The plastic hinge of RC frame is more likely to be formed at the end of column, and the amount of plastic hinge at column ends increases, but decreases at beam ends respectively, compared with excitation of single component of strong motion. Moreover, it is found that different bidirectional seismic input modes have large influence on the inter-story drift ratio and fiber strain, while have small influence on axial compression ratio and failure mode of beam-column joints. The result provides some reference for the seismic design of RC frame considering the effect of the bidirectional seismic action.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Study on Seismic Response Difference of RC Frame Under Excitation of Single and Bidirectional Strong Ground Motion
AU  - Wang Zizhao
AU  - Gong Maosheng
AU  - Wang Kunyang
Y1  - 2022/06/01
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
T2  - Science Discovery
JF  - Science Discovery
JO  - Science Discovery
SP  - 146
EP  - 152
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0650
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20221003.21
AB  - In order to compare the difference of seismic response of RC frame structure under single and bidirectional strong ground motions, a 3-story RC frame structure is designed according to the Chinese seismic design code, and the structural seismic response is analyzed under the excitation of 4 sets of bidirectional strong ground motions by using OpenSEES. Then the seismic response parameters are analyzed and compared between the excitation of single and bidirectional strong ground motions. The result shows that the structural inter-story drift ratio under bidirectional strong ground motion is larger than that of excitation of the single component of strong motion and the column concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain increase, while the beam concrete compressive strain and rebar tensile strain decrease. The plastic hinge of RC frame is more likely to be formed at the end of column, and the amount of plastic hinge at column ends increases, but decreases at beam ends respectively, compared with excitation of single component of strong motion. Moreover, it is found that different bidirectional seismic input modes have large influence on the inter-story drift ratio and fiber strain, while have small influence on axial compression ratio and failure mode of beam-column joints. The result provides some reference for the seismic design of RC frame considering the effect of the bidirectional seismic action.
VL  - 10
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download