As a general-purpose intelligent tutoring system framework for the development of intelligent tutoring system for their subjects, any subject teachers at universities and schools at all levels developed a platform for the operation of editors and intelligent tutoring systems. The knowledge graph is used to extend the subject graph, hyper-concept graph, basic concept graph, subconcept and help-concept graph. The intelligent tutoring system is designed to emulate the teaching style of human teachers, but to provide individual teaching to each individual student. Therefore, the skills included lecture slide display, video playback, comment display, comment reading by speech synthesizer, student recognition by face recognizer, question presentation and response processing, response results processing by natural language processing, and student’s learning performance prediction et al. Hidden Markov models are known as models that can probabilistically and statistically model the learning path and history of students through time intervals, estimate learning states, and predict learning outcomes. The developed intelligent tutoring system platform estimated and predicted the learning status of the student by the Hidden Markov model and then generated the learning path using a specific algorithm. We also directly generated the learning path using the Markov decision process model. The results of the analysis of the results, using the general-purpose intelligent tutoring system development framework, were very positive, while developing the intelligent tutoring system for AI subjects and allowing students to use it.
| Published in | Science Frontiers (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16 |
| Page(s) | 170-200 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tutor Softbots, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Individual Instruction, Knowledge Graph, Intelligent Tutoring System Platform
| [1] | Goldberg, B., Rowe, J., Spain, R., Mott, B., Lester, J., Pokorny, B., Sottilare, R. (2018). Hands-on with GIFT: A Tutorial on the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018, C. Penstein Rosé et al. (Eds.): AIED 2018, LNAI 10948, pp. 547–550, |
| [2] | Sottilare, R., Brawner, K., Sinatra, A., Johnston, J. (2017). An Updated Concept for a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring. US Army Research Lab, Orlando, FL. |
| [3] | Goldberg, B., Hoffman, M., Tarr, R. (2015). Authoring instructional management logic in GIFT using the EMAP. In: Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Brawner, K. (eds.) Design Recommendations for ITS: Authoring Tools, vol. 3. US Army Research Laboratory. |
| [4] | Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1(1), 73–105. |
| [5] | Rowe, J., Mott, B., Lester, J., Pokorny, B., Peng, W., Goldberg, B. (2015). Toward a modular reinforcement learning framework for tutorial planning in GIFT. In: Sottilare, R., Sinatra, A.,(eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual GIFT Users Symposium. |
| [6] | Sottilare, R., Robson, R., Barr, A., Graesser, A., Hu, X. (2018). Exploring Opportunities to Standardize Adaptive Instructional Systems(AISs). Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018, C. Penstein Rosé et al. (Eds.): AIED 2018, LNAI 10948, pp. 547-550, |
| [7] | Aleven, V. A., Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn. Sci. 26(2), 147-179. |
| [8] | Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. J. Educ. Media 29(3), 241-250. |
| [9] | Sottilare, R. A., Brawner, K. W., Goldberg, B. S., Holden, H. K. (2012). The Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). Concept Paper Released as Part of GIFT Software Documentation. US Army Research Laboratory-Human Research and Engineering Directorate (ARL-HRED). US Army Research Laboratory-Human Research and Engineering Directorate (ARL-HRED), Orlando. |
| [10] | Wetzel, J., VanLehn, K., Butler, D., Chaudhari, P., Desai, A., Feng, J., Samala, R. (2017). The design and development of the dragoon intelligent tutoring system for model construction: lessons learned. Interact. Learn. Environ. 25(3), 361-381. |
| [11] | Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., Suraweera, P., Zakharov, K., Milik, N., Holland, J., McGuigan, N. (2009). ASPIRE: an authoring system and deployment environment for constraint-based tutors. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 19(2), 155-188. |
| [12] | Folsom-Kovarik, J. T., Raybourn, E. M. (2016). Total learning architecture (TLA) enables next generation learning via meta-adaptation. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference, Nov. |
| [13] | Ramirez, C., Valdes, B. (2012). A General Knowledge Representation Model of Concepts, Advances in Knowledge Representation, InTech. |
| [14] |
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2022). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall. Retrieved from
http://www.amazon.com/Artificial-Intelligence-ApproachStuart-Russell/dp/0131038052 |
| [15] | Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic Information Processing. In M. Minsky (Ed.), (p. 227-270.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. |
| [16] | Gruber, T. R. (1993). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 43, 907-928. |
| [17] | Li, J., Hou, L. (2017). Review of knowledge graph research. J. Shanxi Univ., Natural Sci. Ed., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 454-459, Mar. |
| [18] | Chen, Z. et al. (2020). Knowledge Graph Completion: A Review. IEEE Access, 2020.3030076, VOLUME 8. |
| [19] | Ehrlinger, L., Wöß, W. (2016). Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs. SEMANTICS 2016: Posters and Demos Track September 13-14, Leipzig, Germany. |
| [20] | Vande Pol, J., Volman, M., Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 271-296. |
| [21] | Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: an intelligent tutoring system on world wide web. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., Lesgold, A. (eds.) ITS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1086, pp. 261-269. Springer, Heidelberg. |
| [22] | Chi, M., Jordan, P., VanLehn, K. (2014). When is tutorial dialogue more effective than step-based tutoring? In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K. E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 210-219. Springer, Cham. |
| [23] | Rosen, Y., Rushkin, I., Rubin, R., Munson, L., Ang, A., Weber, G., Lopez, G., Tingley, D. (2018). Adaptive Learning Open Source Initiative for MOOC Experimentation, © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018, C. Penstein Rosé et al. (Eds.): AIED 2018, LNAI 10948, pp. 307-311, |
| [24] | Shen, S. (2020). Empirically Evaluating the Effectiveness of POMDP vs. MDP Towards the Pedagogical Strategies Induction. AIED 2020, LNAI 10948, pp. 109-113, |
APA Style
Kwon, S., Ko, Y., Ko, C., Rim, J., Jang, S., et al. (2025). Intelligent Tutoring System Framework and Learning Platform Development. Science Frontiers, 6(4), 170-200. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16
ACS Style
Kwon, S.; Ko, Y.; Ko, C.; Rim, J.; Jang, S., et al. Intelligent Tutoring System Framework and Learning Platform Development. Sci. Front. 2025, 6(4), 170-200. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16
@article{10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16,
author = {Song-Hwan Kwon and Yun-Ho Ko and Chung-Song Ko and Jong-Nam Rim and Sin-Hye Jang and Yun-Sok Ham and Ha-Gyong Kim and Hyon-Il Son},
title = {Intelligent Tutoring System Framework and Learning Platform Development},
journal = {Science Frontiers},
volume = {6},
number = {4},
pages = {170-200},
doi = {10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sf.20250604.16},
abstract = {As a general-purpose intelligent tutoring system framework for the development of intelligent tutoring system for their subjects, any subject teachers at universities and schools at all levels developed a platform for the operation of editors and intelligent tutoring systems. The knowledge graph is used to extend the subject graph, hyper-concept graph, basic concept graph, subconcept and help-concept graph. The intelligent tutoring system is designed to emulate the teaching style of human teachers, but to provide individual teaching to each individual student. Therefore, the skills included lecture slide display, video playback, comment display, comment reading by speech synthesizer, student recognition by face recognizer, question presentation and response processing, response results processing by natural language processing, and student’s learning performance prediction et al. Hidden Markov models are known as models that can probabilistically and statistically model the learning path and history of students through time intervals, estimate learning states, and predict learning outcomes. The developed intelligent tutoring system platform estimated and predicted the learning status of the student by the Hidden Markov model and then generated the learning path using a specific algorithm. We also directly generated the learning path using the Markov decision process model. The results of the analysis of the results, using the general-purpose intelligent tutoring system development framework, were very positive, while developing the intelligent tutoring system for AI subjects and allowing students to use it.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Intelligent Tutoring System Framework and Learning Platform Development AU - Song-Hwan Kwon AU - Yun-Ho Ko AU - Chung-Song Ko AU - Jong-Nam Rim AU - Sin-Hye Jang AU - Yun-Sok Ham AU - Ha-Gyong Kim AU - Hyon-Il Son Y1 - 2025/12/30 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16 DO - 10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16 T2 - Science Frontiers JF - Science Frontiers JO - Science Frontiers SP - 170 EP - 200 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7030 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250604.16 AB - As a general-purpose intelligent tutoring system framework for the development of intelligent tutoring system for their subjects, any subject teachers at universities and schools at all levels developed a platform for the operation of editors and intelligent tutoring systems. The knowledge graph is used to extend the subject graph, hyper-concept graph, basic concept graph, subconcept and help-concept graph. The intelligent tutoring system is designed to emulate the teaching style of human teachers, but to provide individual teaching to each individual student. Therefore, the skills included lecture slide display, video playback, comment display, comment reading by speech synthesizer, student recognition by face recognizer, question presentation and response processing, response results processing by natural language processing, and student’s learning performance prediction et al. Hidden Markov models are known as models that can probabilistically and statistically model the learning path and history of students through time intervals, estimate learning states, and predict learning outcomes. The developed intelligent tutoring system platform estimated and predicted the learning status of the student by the Hidden Markov model and then generated the learning path using a specific algorithm. We also directly generated the learning path using the Markov decision process model. The results of the analysis of the results, using the general-purpose intelligent tutoring system development framework, were very positive, while developing the intelligent tutoring system for AI subjects and allowing students to use it. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -