Reliable data on causes of death are essential to guide health policy, yet fewer than one in ten deaths is medically certified in many sub-Saharan African countries. Since 2021, Senegal has progressively deployed a harmonized set of WHO-aligned death management tools, including a medical certificate of cause of death (MCCD); an initial 2023 assessment had revealed partial tool availability, frequent completion errors, and insufficient trained staff. A second national cross-sectional assessment was conducted in 2025, combining a facility-level structural audit with a systematic review of MCCDs completed in 2024, using a standardized digitized tool to record tool availability, utilization, and training coverage, and to score certificate content and form (score out of 30 points: poor ≤10, medium 11-20, good 21-30); data were analyzed descriptively. Of 183 targeted facilities, 147 (80.3%) were supervised (27/39 public hospitals [EPS], 69.2%; 120/144 health centers [CS], 83.3%). MCCD availability exceeded 90% in most EPS clinical departments but fell to 50-60% in surgery and intensive care and was nil in mortuaries; in CS, clinical documents were available in 99% of cases, versus 69-70% for mortuary-related registers, and utilization was consistently lower than availability. Training coverage reached 72.8% of supervised EPS departments and 73% of supervised CS. Among 1,469 MCCDs examined, representing 25% of the 5,852 medically certified deaths recorded nationally in 2024, only 292 (19.9%) were of good quality, 596 (40.6%) of medium quality, and 581 (39.6%) of poor quality, with poor quality predominating throughout the year (35.0-48.9% by month). The interval between disease onset and death was most frequently left blank (77%), and the causal sequence showed the highest error rate (27%), most often recording a sign or mechanism of death instead of a diagnosis. Only 46% of certificates were written in capital letters, 79% were legible, 66% were free of abbreviations, and 77% were free of crossing-out. Training deficit was the most frequently reported obstacle (65.6% of facilities), followed by non-availability of tools (13.1%). After two years of implementing harmonized death management tools, this assessment shows improved tool availability in Senegal's public health facilities but reveals persistent gaps in effective utilization and, above all, in the technical quality of medical certification, which remains well below what is required for reliable mortality statistics. Sustained initial and continuing training, systematic supervision, and uniform tool availability, particularly in surgery, intensive care, and mortuary services, are needed to ensure reliable cause-of-death data for national health policy.
| Published in | World Journal of Public Health (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14 |
| Page(s) | 439-453 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Medical Certificate of Cause of Death, Vital Statistics, Mortality Surveillance, Data Quality, Senegal
| [1] | AbouZahr C, de Savigny D, Mikkelsen L, Setel PW, Lozano R, Nichols E, et al. Civil registration and vital statistics: progress in the data revolution for counting and accountability. Lancet. 2015; 386. |
| [2] | Mikkelsen L, Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, Setel PW, et al. A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet. 2015; 386(10001). |
| [3] | Karlinsky A. International completeness of death registration. Demogr Res. 2024; 50: 1151-1170. |
| [4] |
World Health Organization. Civil registration and vital statistics [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited August 2026]. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/civil-registration-and-vital-statistics |
| [5] | World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO. Available from: |
| [6] | World Health Organization. Recommendations for conducting an external inspection of a body and filling in the medical certificate of cause of death. Geneva: WHO. |
| [7] | World Health Organization. ICD-11 reference guide: mortality coding and reporting [Internet]. Geneva: WHO. Available from: |
| [8] | Joshi R, Yin P, Hart JD, Kwa V, Riley I, Li H, et al. Integrating community-based verbal autopsy into civil registration and vital statistics: lessons learnt from five countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(11): e006760. |
| [9] | de Savigny D, Riley I, Chandramohan D, Odhiambo F, Nichols E, Notzon S, et al. Integrating community-based verbal autopsy into civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS): system-level considerations. Glob Health Action. 2017; 10(1): 1272882. |
| [10] | Yokobori Y, Obara H, Sugiura Y, Kitamura T. Gaps in the civil registration and vital statistics systems of low- and middle-income countries and the health sector’s role in improving the situation. Glob Health Med. 2021; 3(4): 243-245. |
| [11] | Hart JD, Sorchik R, Bo KS, Chowdhury HR, Gamage S, Joshi R, et al. Improving medical certification of cause of death: effective strategies and approaches based on experiences from the Data for Health Initiative. BMC Med. 2020; 18: 74. |
| [12] | Niang K, Fall A, Ndiaye S, Sarr M, Ba K, Masquelier B. Enhancing the value of death registration with verbal autopsy data: a pilot study in the Senegalese urban population in 2019. Arch Public Health. 2023; 81: 45. |
| [13] | Nyondo T, Msigwa G, Cobos D, Kabadi G, Macha T, Karugendo E, et al. Improving quality of medical certification of causes of death in health facilities in Tanzania 2014-2019. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21: 214. |
| [14] | Gamage USH, Mahesh PKB, Schnall J, Mikkelsen L, Hart JD, Chowdhury H, et al. Effectiveness of training interventions to improve quality of medical certification of cause of death: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2020; 18: 384. |
| [15] | El-Gibaly O, Abo Elela MGM, Rizk YFA, Mahmoud SHH. Improving medical certification of cause of death in Assiut University Children Hospital: an intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24: 1506. |
APA Style
Gadiaga, T., Diane, A. M. D., Ndiaye, I., Seck, N., Dia, O., et al. (2026). Availability and Utilization of Tools for the Medical Certification of Causes of Death in Public Health Facilities in Senegal in 2025. World Journal of Public Health, 11(4), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14
ACS Style
Gadiaga, T.; Diane, A. M. D.; Ndiaye, I.; Seck, N.; Dia, O., et al. Availability and Utilization of Tools for the Medical Certification of Causes of Death in Public Health Facilities in Senegal in 2025. World J. Public Health 2026, 11(4), 439-453. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14
@article{10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14,
author = {Tidiane Gadiaga and Adja Mah Djamaro Diane and Ibrahima Ndiaye and Ngone Seck and Ousmane Dia and Amina Abdoulaye and Benjamin Clapham and Mohamed M. Soumah and Ousmane Thiam and Babacar Gueye},
title = {Availability and Utilization of Tools for the Medical Certification of Causes of Death in Public Health Facilities in Senegal in 2025},
journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {439-453},
doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20261104.14},
abstract = {Reliable data on causes of death are essential to guide health policy, yet fewer than one in ten deaths is medically certified in many sub-Saharan African countries. Since 2021, Senegal has progressively deployed a harmonized set of WHO-aligned death management tools, including a medical certificate of cause of death (MCCD); an initial 2023 assessment had revealed partial tool availability, frequent completion errors, and insufficient trained staff. A second national cross-sectional assessment was conducted in 2025, combining a facility-level structural audit with a systematic review of MCCDs completed in 2024, using a standardized digitized tool to record tool availability, utilization, and training coverage, and to score certificate content and form (score out of 30 points: poor ≤10, medium 11-20, good 21-30); data were analyzed descriptively. Of 183 targeted facilities, 147 (80.3%) were supervised (27/39 public hospitals [EPS], 69.2%; 120/144 health centers [CS], 83.3%). MCCD availability exceeded 90% in most EPS clinical departments but fell to 50-60% in surgery and intensive care and was nil in mortuaries; in CS, clinical documents were available in 99% of cases, versus 69-70% for mortuary-related registers, and utilization was consistently lower than availability. Training coverage reached 72.8% of supervised EPS departments and 73% of supervised CS. Among 1,469 MCCDs examined, representing 25% of the 5,852 medically certified deaths recorded nationally in 2024, only 292 (19.9%) were of good quality, 596 (40.6%) of medium quality, and 581 (39.6%) of poor quality, with poor quality predominating throughout the year (35.0-48.9% by month). The interval between disease onset and death was most frequently left blank (77%), and the causal sequence showed the highest error rate (27%), most often recording a sign or mechanism of death instead of a diagnosis. Only 46% of certificates were written in capital letters, 79% were legible, 66% were free of abbreviations, and 77% were free of crossing-out. Training deficit was the most frequently reported obstacle (65.6% of facilities), followed by non-availability of tools (13.1%). After two years of implementing harmonized death management tools, this assessment shows improved tool availability in Senegal's public health facilities but reveals persistent gaps in effective utilization and, above all, in the technical quality of medical certification, which remains well below what is required for reliable mortality statistics. Sustained initial and continuing training, systematic supervision, and uniform tool availability, particularly in surgery, intensive care, and mortuary services, are needed to ensure reliable cause-of-death data for national health policy.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Availability and Utilization of Tools for the Medical Certification of Causes of Death in Public Health Facilities in Senegal in 2025 AU - Tidiane Gadiaga AU - Adja Mah Djamaro Diane AU - Ibrahima Ndiaye AU - Ngone Seck AU - Ousmane Dia AU - Amina Abdoulaye AU - Benjamin Clapham AU - Mohamed M. Soumah AU - Ousmane Thiam AU - Babacar Gueye Y1 - 2026/10/23 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14 DO - 10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14 T2 - World Journal of Public Health JF - World Journal of Public Health JO - World Journal of Public Health SP - 439 EP - 453 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6059 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20261104.14 AB - Reliable data on causes of death are essential to guide health policy, yet fewer than one in ten deaths is medically certified in many sub-Saharan African countries. Since 2021, Senegal has progressively deployed a harmonized set of WHO-aligned death management tools, including a medical certificate of cause of death (MCCD); an initial 2023 assessment had revealed partial tool availability, frequent completion errors, and insufficient trained staff. A second national cross-sectional assessment was conducted in 2025, combining a facility-level structural audit with a systematic review of MCCDs completed in 2024, using a standardized digitized tool to record tool availability, utilization, and training coverage, and to score certificate content and form (score out of 30 points: poor ≤10, medium 11-20, good 21-30); data were analyzed descriptively. Of 183 targeted facilities, 147 (80.3%) were supervised (27/39 public hospitals [EPS], 69.2%; 120/144 health centers [CS], 83.3%). MCCD availability exceeded 90% in most EPS clinical departments but fell to 50-60% in surgery and intensive care and was nil in mortuaries; in CS, clinical documents were available in 99% of cases, versus 69-70% for mortuary-related registers, and utilization was consistently lower than availability. Training coverage reached 72.8% of supervised EPS departments and 73% of supervised CS. Among 1,469 MCCDs examined, representing 25% of the 5,852 medically certified deaths recorded nationally in 2024, only 292 (19.9%) were of good quality, 596 (40.6%) of medium quality, and 581 (39.6%) of poor quality, with poor quality predominating throughout the year (35.0-48.9% by month). The interval between disease onset and death was most frequently left blank (77%), and the causal sequence showed the highest error rate (27%), most often recording a sign or mechanism of death instead of a diagnosis. Only 46% of certificates were written in capital letters, 79% were legible, 66% were free of abbreviations, and 77% were free of crossing-out. Training deficit was the most frequently reported obstacle (65.6% of facilities), followed by non-availability of tools (13.1%). After two years of implementing harmonized death management tools, this assessment shows improved tool availability in Senegal's public health facilities but reveals persistent gaps in effective utilization and, above all, in the technical quality of medical certification, which remains well below what is required for reliable mortality statistics. Sustained initial and continuing training, systematic supervision, and uniform tool availability, particularly in surgery, intensive care, and mortuary services, are needed to ensure reliable cause-of-death data for national health policy. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -