2023, Volume 8
2022, Volume 7
2021, Volume 6
2020, Volume 5
2019, Volume 4
2018, Volume 3
2017, Volume 2
2016, Volume 1
Submit a Manuscript
Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.
Center of Faculty Development and Teaching Evaluation, Institute of Higher Education, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
Professional graduate education has taken on an increasingly pivotal role in the realm of higher education, with practice bases serving as indispensable components that wield substantial influence over the training and development of professional graduate students. This comprehensive study, firmly grounded in the intricacies of performance management acquisition, conducts a thorough exploration of the multifaceted dimensions essential for evaluating management performance within practice bases for professional degree graduate students. This research scrutinizes five key facets, encompassing management mechanisms, practice conditions, practical training, practical achievements, and base characteristics. These components collectively constitute the core of our evaluation framework. Through rigorous analysis, we have devised a five-dimensional model comprised of sixteen secondary dimensions for assessing management performance within the realm of professional graduate internship bases. Management mechanism, practice conditions, practical training, practical achievements, and base characteristics are crucial factors contributing to the management performance of practice bases for professional graduate students. Practice conditions encompass research facilities, practice spaces, resource investments, and condition assurance. Practical teaching objectives, practical teacher's teaching ability, and student practical learning gains are pivotal factors that cumulatively influence the efficacy of practical training. Practical achievements comprise the number of practical achievements, their contribution, and the extent of transformation they undergo. The influence, reputation, and characteristic vividness of practice bases for professional graduate students are interrelated elements, impacting one another and constituting the evaluation dimension of these bases' distinct features. This innovative model is expressly designed to guide universities and administrators in a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of practice bases. It not only provides a structured framework for performance assessment but also furnishes a valuable tool for decision-makers to identify areas necessitating improvement, allocate resources judiciously, and enhance the overall quality of professional graduate education.
Professional Graduate Students, Management Performance, Evaluation Model, Practice Base, Performance Assessment
Caiyun Sun. (2023). Research on the Performance Evaluation Model for the Management of Professional Degree Graduate Practice Bases. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 8(6), 226-231. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20230806.11
Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
|1.||State Council Academic Degrees Committee & Ministry of Education. (Year). "Several Opinions on Further Strictly Regulating the Quality Management of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education." [EB/OL]. (2020-09-28). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/202009/t20200928_492182.html|
|2.||State Council Academic Degrees Committee & Ministry of Education. (Year). "Notice on Issuing the 'Development Plan for Professional Graduate Education (2020-2025).'"[EB/OL]. (2020-09-30). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/202009/t20200930_492590.html|
|3.||Chao. Y (2023). Connotation, Logic and Practice Path for High-quality Development of Professional Degree. Journal of Graduate Education (04), 56-63.|
|4.||FengLiang. L & YaQin. M. (2023). On Building a High-quality Professional Degree Postgraduate Education System. Journal of Graduate Education (02), 1-6.|
|5.||Brown, R. (2018). A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Graduate Practicum Programs. Journal of Higher Education Administration, 22(2), 201-218.|
|6.||Williams, P. (2020). Innovations in Graduate Practicum Site Management. Educational Leadership, 35(3), 123-136.|
|7.||Johnson, C. (2020). Performance Evaluation Models in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(4), 387-401.|
|8.||Brown, D. (2021). Improving Graduate Internship Program Performance: A Comparative Study of Models. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 56(2), 187-203.|
|9.||Jones, B. (2019). The Role of Internships in Professional Graduate Education. Journal of Applied Learning, 15(2), 78-94.|
|10.||Brown, C. (2020). Challenges in Managing Graduate Practicum Sites. Higher Education Management Journal, 25(4), 123-136.|
|11.||Johnson, D. (2017). The Role of Practicum Experiences in Graduate Education. Journal of Applied Learning, 12(2), 45-58.|
|12.||White, L. (2019). Bridging the Gap: Connecting Theory and Practice in Graduate Education. Education Quarterly, 38(1), 67-82.|
|13.||Smith, J. (2021). The Long-Term Impact of Graduate Practicum Experiences on Career Development. Journal of Career Development, 55(3), 301-318.|
|14.||DeHong. Z, ManQing. L & Wen. L.(2018). Study on the Practice Base Performance Evaluation System for the Master of Safety Engineering. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection (07), 45-49.|
|15.||Yu. Y. (2019). The Logic and Way Out of the Construction of Educational Practice Base for Professional Postgraduates-A Study of the Educational Practice Base of Master of Engineering. Education Science (05), 92-96.|
|16.||Qian. Y & Yue. S. (2023). Research on Connotative Quality Evaluation of the Practice Base for Professional Degree Postgraduates. Journal of Graduate Education (02), 75-80.|