Science Innovation

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

Localization Research of "Dual System" Educational Thought

The German “Dual system” vocational education model once played a key role in the vigorous economic growth of Germany after World War II. As time goes on, with the development of the economy and changes of society, the “Dual system” vocational education model is greatly challenged. Similarly, the implementation of the “original” German “Dual system” education model in China has become a thing of the past. However, the deep thought of the “Dual system” can be inherited, improved, developed, innovated, and utilized. Education in the new era has given a new connotation to the localization of the “Dual system” education thought, providing a broader space for the innovation of the “Dual system” education thought. Meanwhile, the localized “Dual system” education thought has broken away from the single level of vocational education and is revitalized in the field of basic education. By exploring and studying the local “Dual system” education thought for 25 years, we proposed the localized “Dual system” education concept of “focusing on practice in the study of theory, focusing on experience in practice”. The foundation of the localized “Dual system” education concept is practice, the key is experience, and the core is allowing students to form new thinking in experience. This paper summarizes the exploration and practice of the localized “Dual system” education thought in the field of basic education.

Dual System Educational Thought, Pattern, Theory, Practice

Bo Zhou. (2023). Localization Research of "Dual System" Educational Thought. Science Innovation, 11(6), 229-234.

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. 李政涛, 叶澜. 新时代教育理论创新从何而来. 中国教育报 [D] 2021年05月20日第7版 (版名: 理论周刊•教育科学).
2. 谢维和. 教育强国需要自己的教育理论 [J]. 中国基础教育, 2023 (01): 12-15.
3. 高书国. 新发展阶段中国基础教育的战略思考 [J]. 人民教育, 2021 (06): 40-43.
4. 陈丽, 郭玉娟, 张文梅. “互联网+教育”的世界观:复杂系统观 [J]. 中国远程教育, 2023, 43 (08).
5. 周波. 谈长作业的特点与实施 [J]. 中小学教师培训, 2012 (10): 49-50.
6. 吴金瑜. 新高考、新课标导向下普通高中课程与教学改革研究 [J]. 创新人才教育, 2021 (03): 39-45.
7. 中户人民共和国教育法.根据2021年4月29日第十三届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十八次会议 «关于修改〈中华人民共和国教育法〉的决定» 第三次修正
8. 教育部. 普通高中课程方案 (2017年版2020年修订). 人民教育出版社.
9. 廖伯琴. «普通高中物理课程标准» (2017年版) 要点解读 [J]. 物理教学, 2020, 42 (02): 2-5.
10. 肖永贵. 深度解析楼间距问题 [J]. 教育界 (基础教育), 2019 (05): 85-86.
11. 钟绍春. 人工智能如何推动教育革命 [J]. 中国电化教育, 2020 (03): 17-24.
12. 上海电子工业学校课题组. 论“双元制”模式下中职课程与信息技术的整合 [J]. 职教论坛, 2006 (04): 52-55.
13. 李雨宸. 基于多元智能理论的学生语文素养培养策略探讨 [J]. 成才之路, 2021 (35): 89-91.
14. 汪林. 课堂议题实施四策 [J]. 思想政治课教学, 2021 (10): 52-53.
15. 赵娜. 浅析人才评价中的模糊思维 [J]. 社科纵横 (新理论版), 2011, 26 (01): 87+97.