The study with a descriptive and analytical approach, foundations on existing literature on job satisfaction and employee welfare, including previous theories proposed by Armstrong, Herzberg, examines the impact of Employee Welfare facilities on Job satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India. The study find the key welfare facilities such as canteen facilities, accommodation, loan facilities, healthcare, transport, and overall working conditions. The research develops hypotheses framework to test the relationship between concern welfare facilities and job satisfaction. The study was well examined through a structured questionnaire and based on secondary sources. The study findings suggest that employee welfare facilities positively influence employees’ job satisfaction by improving their morale, health, and overall HYPERLINK "http://well-being.on" \h well-being. On the other hand, inadequate healthcare, low pay, poor benefits, high work pressure, and rising living costs negatively affect satisfaction of the employee and also increase turnover intentions. The study highlights that welfare facilities such as canteen services, accommodation, and financial support mechanisms significantly contribute to enhancing employee commitment and productivity. The study aims to examine the impact of welfare facilities on the job satisfaction of supporting staff in the automobile sector in India. Supporting staff form a substantial portion of the workforce and are directly involved in the assembly and production processes, making their satisfaction essential for organizational performance.
| Published in | American Journal of Management Science and Engineering (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11 |
| Page(s) | 73-77 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Job Satisfaction, Employee Welfare, Automobile Sector, Supporting Staff, Human Resource Management
Anova | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Sum of squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
1 | Regression | 36.02 | 3 | 13.42 | 33.26 | 0.00 |
Residual | 36.55 | 98 | .325 | |||
Total | 72.78 | 99 | ||||
Dependent variable: Job satisfaction | ||||||
Predictors: (Constant), Canteen facilities, Accommodation, Loan Facilities. | ||||||
Model Summary | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change Statistics | |||||||||
Model | R | R Square | Std. error | R square Change | F Change | Df1 | Df2 | Sig F Change | Durbin- Watson |
1 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 33.25 | 3 | 97 | 0.00 | 2.55 |
Predictors: (Constant), Canteen Facilities, Accommodation Loan Facilities | |||||||||
Dependent variable: Job Satisfaction | |||||||||
Coefficients | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized Coefficient | T | Sig. | ||
B | Std. error | Beta | ||||
1 | (Constant) | 0.88 | .261 | 3.333 | 0.00 | |
Canteen | 0.56 | .189 | .52 | 2.987 | 0.00 | |
Accommodation | 0.22 | .166 | .54 | 2.94 | 0.00 | |
Loan | .055 | .159 | .17 | 1.255 | 0.00 | |
Dependent Variable: Job Satisfaction. | ||||||
Sr. No. | Hypothesis | B | Sig. | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | H1: There is a significant positive relationship between canteen facilities and job satisfaction among employees of automobile sector. | 0.55 | 0.00 | Accepted |
2 | H2: There is a significant positive relationship between Accommodation and job satisfaction among employees of automobile sector. | 0.56 | 0.00 | Accepted |
3 | H3: There is a significant positive relationship between Loan Facilities and job satisfaction among employees of automobile sector. | 0.25 | 0.00 | Accepted |
| [1] |
Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page Publishing.
https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1927862 |
| [2] | Arnett, D. B. (2005). Using job satisfaction and pride an internal marketing tool. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 171-193. |
| [3] | Dunnette, M., Campbell, J., & Hakel, M. (1967). Factors contributing to job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction in six occupational groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2(2), 143-174. |
| [4] |
George, J., & Jones, G. (2008). Understanding and Managing Organizational behavior (Fifth Edition ed.)
https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1896946 |
| [5] | Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279. |
| [6] | Hilton, B. L. (1968). An empirical investigation of the Herzberg methodology and two-factor theory. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 3(3), 286-309. |
| [7] | Kara, S. (2020). Investigation of Job Satisfaction and Burnout of Visual Arts Teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 160-171. |
| [8] | Kaya, E. (1995). Job Satisfaction of the Librarians in the Developing Countries. 61st Infrageneric Conference - Conference Proceedings. Retrieved February 12, 2024, from |
| [9] | Kim, W. G., Leong, J. K., & Lee, Y.-k. (2005). Effect of service orientation nonsatisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention of leaving in a casual dining chain restaurant. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 171-193. |
| [10] |
Locke, E. A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrialand Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1343).
https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1063346 |
| [11] | Newstorm, J. (2017). Organizational Behaviour: Human Behaviour at Work (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin. Retrieved August 02, 202314. |
| [12] | Qader, A. N. (2021, July). The Effect of Non-Monetary Incentives & Work Environment on Employee’s Job Satisfaction. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(7). |
| [13] | Spector, P. E. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. |
| [14] | Statt, D. (2004). The Routledge Dictionary of Business Management (Third ed.). Detroit: Routeledge Publishing. |
| [15] |
Vroom, V. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1382448 |
| [16] | Weiss, D. J., Dawes, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, Minneapolis. |
APA Style
Sehgal, M. (2026). Impact of Employee Welfare Facilities on the Job Satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 11(3), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11
ACS Style
Sehgal, M. Impact of Employee Welfare Facilities on the Job Satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India. Am. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2026, 11(3), 73-77. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11,
author = {Monika Sehgal},
title = {Impact of Employee Welfare Facilities on the Job Satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India},
journal = {American Journal of Management Science and Engineering},
volume = {11},
number = {3},
pages = {73-77},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmse.20261103.11},
abstract = {The study with a descriptive and analytical approach, foundations on existing literature on job satisfaction and employee welfare, including previous theories proposed by Armstrong, Herzberg, examines the impact of Employee Welfare facilities on Job satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India. The study find the key welfare facilities such as canteen facilities, accommodation, loan facilities, healthcare, transport, and overall working conditions. The research develops hypotheses framework to test the relationship between concern welfare facilities and job satisfaction. The study was well examined through a structured questionnaire and based on secondary sources. The study findings suggest that employee welfare facilities positively influence employees’ job satisfaction by improving their morale, health, and overall HYPERLINK "http://well-being.on" \h well-being. On the other hand, inadequate healthcare, low pay, poor benefits, high work pressure, and rising living costs negatively affect satisfaction of the employee and also increase turnover intentions. The study highlights that welfare facilities such as canteen services, accommodation, and financial support mechanisms significantly contribute to enhancing employee commitment and productivity. The study aims to examine the impact of welfare facilities on the job satisfaction of supporting staff in the automobile sector in India. Supporting staff form a substantial portion of the workforce and are directly involved in the assembly and production processes, making their satisfaction essential for organizational performance.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of Employee Welfare Facilities on the Job Satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India AU - Monika Sehgal Y1 - 2026/06/26 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11 T2 - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering SP - 73 EP - 77 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1379 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20261103.11 AB - The study with a descriptive and analytical approach, foundations on existing literature on job satisfaction and employee welfare, including previous theories proposed by Armstrong, Herzberg, examines the impact of Employee Welfare facilities on Job satisfaction of Automobile Industry in India. The study find the key welfare facilities such as canteen facilities, accommodation, loan facilities, healthcare, transport, and overall working conditions. The research develops hypotheses framework to test the relationship between concern welfare facilities and job satisfaction. The study was well examined through a structured questionnaire and based on secondary sources. The study findings suggest that employee welfare facilities positively influence employees’ job satisfaction by improving their morale, health, and overall HYPERLINK "http://well-being.on" \h well-being. On the other hand, inadequate healthcare, low pay, poor benefits, high work pressure, and rising living costs negatively affect satisfaction of the employee and also increase turnover intentions. The study highlights that welfare facilities such as canteen services, accommodation, and financial support mechanisms significantly contribute to enhancing employee commitment and productivity. The study aims to examine the impact of welfare facilities on the job satisfaction of supporting staff in the automobile sector in India. Supporting staff form a substantial portion of the workforce and are directly involved in the assembly and production processes, making their satisfaction essential for organizational performance. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -
Department of Management, MERI College of Engineering and Technology, Patna, India
Information