Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Impact of Employees’ Oriented Leadership Style on Employee Performance: A Survey of Three Public Universities in South Sudan

Received: 8 October 2026     Accepted: 17 October 2026     Published: 28 October 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study examines the influence of employee-oriented leadership style on employee performance in three selected public universities in South Sudan. The study was motivated by persistent operational and socioeconomic challenges affecting the higher education sector, including staff and student strikes, delayed salary payments, inadequate infrastructure and accommodation, rising tuition costs, food shortages, armed conflict, poverty, and other disruptions associated with a fragile and post-conflict environment. These conditions have raised concerns regarding the capacity of university leadership to sustain institutional effectiveness, employee motivation, and performance. The study adopted a quantitative research approach. Data were collected using structured questionnaires distributed to academic and administrative staff across the three selected public universities. Of the 325 questionnaires distributed, 220 were successfully returned, yielding a response rate of 73%. The measurement instrument demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.973 to 0.986. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were employed to examine the relationship between leadership style and employee performance. The findings demonstrated a strong and statistically significant positive relationship between employee-oriented leadership style and employee performance. Regression analysis indicated that a one-unit increase in the Leadership Styles Index was associated with a 0.605-unit increase in employee performance (β = 0.886, p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.530-0.680). The findings also revealed institutional variations in leadership practices. The University of Juba and Dr. John Garang Memorial University of Science and Technology exhibited comparatively lower levels of employee-oriented leadership practices than the University of Upper Nile. The study further established that university leaders employed combinations of leadership styles, with their effectiveness varying according to institutional contexts and prevailing challenges. Several institutional constraints were identified, including weak promotion systems, inadequate infrastructure, and limited opportunities for staff development, low employee motivation, ineffective resource utilization, declining student outcomes, and high staff turnover. The study also revealed a substantial gender imbalance among academic and administrative staff, with males constituting 84.1% and females 15.9% of the study population. It recommends strengthening transparent governance and merit-based appointment systems, improving infrastructure and employee welfare, expanding professional development opportunities, enhancing academic quality, research and innovation, and accelerating digital transformation. The study further proposes the TEAD Hybrid Leadership Model, which integrates transformational, autocratic, employee-oriented, and democratic leadership approaches, as a context-sensitive framework for strengthening institutional resilience, enhancing employee performance, and supporting the long-term sustainability of public universities in South Sudan.

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 12, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12
Page(s) 83-96
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Employees, Oriented, Leadership, Style, Employee, Performance, Survey, Public, Universities, South Sudan

References
[1] Akec, J. A. (2021). Higher education in South Sudan: Past, present, and future (Differentiation, TVET, STI ecosystems, and gender balance). African Journal of Rural Development.
[2] Alenezi, H., Kumar, S., & Alshammari, R. (2023). Digital education and university infrastructure development: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 1-15.
[3] Chen, Q., & Wang, L. (2021). Perceptions of laissez-faire leadership and innovation climate in Taiwanese technology firms. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(1), 65-82.
[4] Chen, S., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Participative leadership and change management in Chinese enterprises. Asian Business & Management, 22(3), 245-265.
[5] Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1991). Building your company's vision. Harvard Business Review, 69(5), 65-77.
[6] García, P., & Torres, J. (2021). Democratic leadership in Spanish healthcare. Leadership in Health Services, 34(4), 367-383.
[7] García, S., & Santos, R. (2022). Employees-oriented leadership and staff engagement in Spain. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 204-218.
[8] Kau, M. K., & Riak, J. D. C. (2025). The effect of public and community participation on the budget administration process in South Sudan. Journal of Public Administration, 7(1), 58-81.
[9] Koyok, A. (2022). Higher education leadership challenges in South Sudan. South Sudan Journal of Education, 3(1), 1-15.
[10] Kuyok, J. (2017). Funding and remuneration in South Sudanese universities. South Sudan Higher Education Review, 4(2), 34-45. Laufer, R., et al. (2021). Digital transformation in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 45-59.
[11] Lee, M., et al. (2011). Leadership in African universities. African Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 275-289.
[12] Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2023). Employees-oriented leadership in South Korea's banking sector. Korean Journal of Management, 45(3), 222-239.
[13] Luthans, F. (2002). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[14] Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage.
[15] Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
[16] O'Neill, D., & Svensson, E. (2020). Adaptive leadership in Swedish healthcare. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 24(4), 45-64.
[17] O'Neill, S., & Murphy, K. (2020). Leadership and staff wellbeing in Irish healthcare. Irish Journal of Psychology, 41(2), 89-105.
[18] O'Neill, S., & Silva, P. (2020). Employees-oriented leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Management, 12(3), 245-261.
[19] Riak, J. D. C. (2024). Leadership and management in South Sudan: A thought-provoking review. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review, 7(5), 414-431.
[20] Riak, J. D. C. (2025a). The quest for institutional engineering in post-liberation South Sudan: Should it be decentralization or federalism? Journal of Policy & Governance, 5(1), 16-36.
[21] Riak, J. D. C. (2025b). The role of the United Nations in South Sudanese state building and failure. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 8(1), 1-19.
[22] Riak, J. D. C. (2025c). Understanding state dysfunctionality: The role of political elites in South Sudanese state crafting and failure. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 11(1), 23-35.
[23] Van, T., & Adonis, A. (2008). Employee loyalty and trust. Organizational Psychology, 21(4), 123-135.
[24] Yazdani, S., et al. (2011). Working environment and employee motivation. International Journal of Management, 2(4), 184-196.
[25] Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2021). Employees-oriented leadership and turnover intentions in China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(3), 289-300.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Riak, J. D. C., Apet, D. A. A. (2026). Impact of Employees’ Oriented Leadership Style on Employee Performance: A Survey of Three Public Universities in South Sudan. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 12(3), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Riak, J. D. C.; Apet, D. A. A. Impact of Employees’ Oriented Leadership Style on Employee Performance: A Survey of Three Public Universities in South Sudan. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2026, 12(3), 83-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Riak JDC, Apet DAA. Impact of Employees’ Oriented Leadership Style on Employee Performance: A Survey of Three Public Universities in South Sudan. Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2026;12(3):83-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12,
      author = {Jacob Dut Chol Riak and Daniel Atem Awoul Apet},
      title = {Impact of Employees’ Oriented Leadership Style on Employee Performance: A Survey of Three Public Universities in South Sudan},
      journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business},
      volume = {12},
      number = {3},
      pages = {83-96},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20261203.12},
      abstract = {This study examines the influence of employee-oriented leadership style on employee performance in three selected public universities in South Sudan. The study was motivated by persistent operational and socioeconomic challenges affecting the higher education sector, including staff and student strikes, delayed salary payments, inadequate infrastructure and accommodation, rising tuition costs, food shortages, armed conflict, poverty, and other disruptions associated with a fragile and post-conflict environment. These conditions have raised concerns regarding the capacity of university leadership to sustain institutional effectiveness, employee motivation, and performance. The study adopted a quantitative research approach. Data were collected using structured questionnaires distributed to academic and administrative staff across the three selected public universities. Of the 325 questionnaires distributed, 220 were successfully returned, yielding a response rate of 73%. The measurement instrument demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.973 to 0.986. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were employed to examine the relationship between leadership style and employee performance. The findings demonstrated a strong and statistically significant positive relationship between employee-oriented leadership style and employee performance. Regression analysis indicated that a one-unit increase in the Leadership Styles Index was associated with a 0.605-unit increase in employee performance (β = 0.886, p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.530-0.680). The findings also revealed institutional variations in leadership practices. The University of Juba and Dr. John Garang Memorial University of Science and Technology exhibited comparatively lower levels of employee-oriented leadership practices than the University of Upper Nile. The study further established that university leaders employed combinations of leadership styles, with their effectiveness varying according to institutional contexts and prevailing challenges. Several institutional constraints were identified, including weak promotion systems, inadequate infrastructure, and limited opportunities for staff development, low employee motivation, ineffective resource utilization, declining student outcomes, and high staff turnover. The study also revealed a substantial gender imbalance among academic and administrative staff, with males constituting 84.1% and females 15.9% of the study population. It recommends strengthening transparent governance and merit-based appointment systems, improving infrastructure and employee welfare, expanding professional development opportunities, enhancing academic quality, research and innovation, and accelerating digital transformation. The study further proposes the TEAD Hybrid Leadership Model, which integrates transformational, autocratic, employee-oriented, and democratic leadership approaches, as a context-sensitive framework for strengthening institutional resilience, enhancing employee performance, and supporting the long-term sustainability of public universities in South Sudan.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Impact of Employees’ Oriented Leadership Style on Employee Performance: A Survey of Three Public Universities in South Sudan
    AU  - Jacob Dut Chol Riak
    AU  - Daniel Atem Awoul Apet
    Y1  - 2026/10/28
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12
    T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
    JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
    JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
    SP  - 83
    EP  - 96
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-7842
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20261203.12
    AB  - This study examines the influence of employee-oriented leadership style on employee performance in three selected public universities in South Sudan. The study was motivated by persistent operational and socioeconomic challenges affecting the higher education sector, including staff and student strikes, delayed salary payments, inadequate infrastructure and accommodation, rising tuition costs, food shortages, armed conflict, poverty, and other disruptions associated with a fragile and post-conflict environment. These conditions have raised concerns regarding the capacity of university leadership to sustain institutional effectiveness, employee motivation, and performance. The study adopted a quantitative research approach. Data were collected using structured questionnaires distributed to academic and administrative staff across the three selected public universities. Of the 325 questionnaires distributed, 220 were successfully returned, yielding a response rate of 73%. The measurement instrument demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.973 to 0.986. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were employed to examine the relationship between leadership style and employee performance. The findings demonstrated a strong and statistically significant positive relationship between employee-oriented leadership style and employee performance. Regression analysis indicated that a one-unit increase in the Leadership Styles Index was associated with a 0.605-unit increase in employee performance (β = 0.886, p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.530-0.680). The findings also revealed institutional variations in leadership practices. The University of Juba and Dr. John Garang Memorial University of Science and Technology exhibited comparatively lower levels of employee-oriented leadership practices than the University of Upper Nile. The study further established that university leaders employed combinations of leadership styles, with their effectiveness varying according to institutional contexts and prevailing challenges. Several institutional constraints were identified, including weak promotion systems, inadequate infrastructure, and limited opportunities for staff development, low employee motivation, ineffective resource utilization, declining student outcomes, and high staff turnover. The study also revealed a substantial gender imbalance among academic and administrative staff, with males constituting 84.1% and females 15.9% of the study population. It recommends strengthening transparent governance and merit-based appointment systems, improving infrastructure and employee welfare, expanding professional development opportunities, enhancing academic quality, research and innovation, and accelerating digital transformation. The study further proposes the TEAD Hybrid Leadership Model, which integrates transformational, autocratic, employee-oriented, and democratic leadership approaches, as a context-sensitive framework for strengthening institutional resilience, enhancing employee performance, and supporting the long-term sustainability of public universities in South Sudan.
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections